Literature DB >> 24410424

Disentangling precopulatory and postcopulatory sexual selection in polyandrous species.

Benjamin Pélissié1, Philippe Jarne, Violette Sarda, Patrice David.   

Abstract

Sexual selection operates on a sequence of events, from mating to offspring production. Which stages in this sequence undergo stronger selection, especially the relative importance of pre- versus postcopulatory processes, are intensely debated issues. Unequal siring success among mates of polyandrous females is classically taken as evidence for a large contribution of postcopulatory processes to the variance in male reproductive success (var(RSm )). However, paternity skews also depend on the timing and number of copulations, a source of variation that should be considered precopulatory rather than postcopulatory. We develop a method for decomposing var(RSm ) accounting for copulatory activity and apply it to experimental mating groups of the snail Physa acuta. In our experiment, 40% of var(RSm ) emerges at the precopulatory stage, only half of which depends on variation in mating success (number of partners). Ignoring copulation characteristics can therefore lead to severe underestimation of precopulatory sexual selection. Moreover, although only 36% of var(RSm ) arises at the postcopulatory stage, this is when sexual selection on body weight mostly occurs. Finally, trade-offs were detected between different components of precopulatory success, whereas pre- and postcopulatory success appear independent. Our study opens the way to a detailed quantitative understanding of sexual selection in polyandrous species.
© 2014 The Author(s). Evolution © 2014 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bateman gradients; Physa acuta; hermaphrodite; phenotypic trade-offs; sperm precedence; variance decomposition

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24410424     DOI: 10.1111/evo.12353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  22 in total

Review 1.  Sexual selection in hermaphrodites, sperm and broadcast spawners, plants and fungi.

Authors:  Madeleine Beekman; Bart Nieuwenhuis; Daniel Ortiz-Barrientos; Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Structure of sexual networks determines the operation of sexual selection.

Authors:  Grant C McDonald; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Sexual selection predicts species richness across the animal kingdom.

Authors:  Tim Janicke; Michael G Ritchie; Edward H Morrow; Lucas Marie-Orleach
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Sexual selection and sexual size dimorphism in animals.

Authors:  Tim Janicke; Salomé Fromonteil
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 3.812

5.  Dynamic resource allocation between pre- and postcopulatory episodes of sexual selection determines competitive fertilization success.

Authors:  Marion Mehlis; Ingolf P Rick; Theo C M Bakker
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Fluorescent sperm in a transparent worm: validation of a GFP marker to study sexual selection.

Authors:  Lucas Marie-Orleach; Tim Janicke; Dita B Vizoso; Micha Eichmann; Lukas Schärer
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Developmental Environment Effects on Sexual Selection in Male and Female Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Juliano Morimoto; Tommaso Pizzari; Stuart Wigby
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Multivariate selection drives concordant patterns of pre- and postcopulatory sexual selection in a livebearing fish.

Authors:  Alessandro Devigili; Jonathan P Evans; Andrea Di Nisio; Andrea Pilastro
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  The measure and significance of Bateman's principles.

Authors:  Julie M Collet; Rebecca F Dean; Kirsty Worley; David S Richardson; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Why patterns of assortative mating are key to study sexual selection and how to measure them.

Authors:  Grant C McDonald; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.