Literature DB >> 24406017

The prognostic role of ERG immunopositivity in prostatic acinar adenocarcinoma: a study including 454 cases and review of the literature.

Bin Xu1, Myriam Chevarie-Davis1, Simone Chevalier2, Eleanora Scarlata2, Nebras Zeizafoun3, Alice Dragomir2, Simon Tanguay2, Wassim Kassouf2, Armen Aprikian2, Fadi Brimo4.   

Abstract

TMPRSS2/ERG fusion is among the most frequent genetic anomalies in prostate adenocarcinomas. Although positive immunostaining for ERG has been shown to tightly correlate with ERG fusion status, the clinical and prognostic significance of a positive ERG stain remains undetermined. The significance of ERG immunostaining in 454 consecutive prostate adenocarcinomas from radical prostatectomies (RPs) using tissue microarrays, herein, is evaluated. A separate set of 59 cases of incidental prostate adenocarcinoma detected on transurethral resection of prostate with a Gleason score of 6 was also included. ERG translocation was significantly more common in peripheral zone cancer in comparison with cancer of the transitional zone (33% in RP versus 5% in transurethral resection of prostate specimens). In the RP cohort, although ERG positivity was significantly associated with younger age at presentation and lower prostate-specific antigen values, it showed no association with Gleason score or with pathologic stage. In multivariate analysis, biochemical recurrence was only associated with the final RP Gleason score and elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and was unrelated to neither ERG positivity or to its staining intensity. In our hands, ERG positivity was unrelated to either aggressive local tumor characteristics or a worse outcome. Our results, as well as an extensive review of the related literature showing conflicting findings, seem to indicate that ERG immunopositivity cannot be considered as an important prognostic factor in prostate cancer.
© 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biochemical recurrence; ERG; Immunohistochemistry; Prostate adenocarcinoma; TMPRSS2/ERG fusion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24406017     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2013.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  16 in total

1.  Association between pathologic factors and ERG expression in prostate cancer: finding pivotal networking.

Authors:  Seung-Ryeol Lee; Young-Deuk Choi; Nam-Hoon Cho
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Concurrent nuclear ERG and MYC protein overexpression defines a subset of locally advanced prostate cancer: Potential opportunities for synergistic targeted therapeutics.

Authors:  Aaron M Udager; Angelo M DeMarzo; Yang Shi; Jessica L Hicks; Xuhong Cao; Javed Siddiqui; Hui Jiang; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Rohit Mehra
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 4.104

3.  Prostate cancer in Jordanian-Arab population: ERG status and relationship with clinicopathologic characteristics.

Authors:  Najla Aldaoud; Nour Abdo; Samir Al Bashir; Mohammad Alqudah; Noor Marji; Hiba Alzou'bi; Rami Alazab; Kiril Trpkov
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Methylation of PITX2, HOXD3, RASSF1 and TDRD1 predicts biochemical recurrence in high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kirill Litovkin; Steven Joniau; Evelyne Lerut; Annouschka Laenen; Olivier Gevaert; Martin Spahn; Burkhard Kneitz; Sofie Isebaert; Karin Haustermans; Monique Beullens; Aleyde Van Eynde; Mathieu Bollen
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Loss of PTEN expression in ERG-negative prostate cancer predicts secondary therapies and leads to shorter disease-specific survival time after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Kanerva Lahdensuo; Andrew Erickson; Irena Saarinen; Heikki Seikkula; Johan Lundin; Mikael Lundin; Stig Nordling; Anna Bützow; Hanna Vasarainen; Peter J Boström; Pekka Taimen; Antti Rannikko; Tuomas Mirtti
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 7.842

6.  Deletion of Interstitial Genes between TMPRSS2 and ERG Promotes Prostate Cancer Progression.

Authors:  Douglas E Linn; Kathryn L Penney; Roderick T Bronson; Lorelei A Mucci; Zhe Li
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  ERG rearrangement as a novel marker for predicting the extra-prostatic extension of clinically localised prostate cancer.

Authors:  L I Lu; Hao Zhang; Jun Pang; Guo-Liang Hou; Min-Hua Lu; Xin Gao
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  Evaluation of ERG and SPINK1 by Immunohistochemical Staining and Clinicopathological Outcomes in a Multi-Institutional Radical Prostatectomy Cohort of 1067 Patients.

Authors:  James D Brooks; Wei Wei; Sarah Hawley; Heidi Auman; Lisa Newcomb; Hilary Boyer; Ladan Fazli; Jeff Simko; Antonio Hurtado-Coll; Dean A Troyer; Peter R Carroll; Martin Gleave; Raymond Lance; Daniel W Lin; Peter S Nelson; Ian M Thompson; Lawrence D True; Ziding Feng; Jesse K McKenney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Prognostic histopathological and molecular markers on prostate cancer needle-biopsies: a review.

Authors:  A Marije Hoogland; Charlotte F Kweldam; Geert J L H van Leenders
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Low LKB1 Expression Results in Unfavorable Prognosis in Prostate Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Jianlei Lu; Peng Sun; Beibei Sun; Chao Wang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-11-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.