Literature DB >> 27562498

Loss of PTEN expression in ERG-negative prostate cancer predicts secondary therapies and leads to shorter disease-specific survival time after radical prostatectomy.

Kanerva Lahdensuo1, Andrew Erickson2, Irena Saarinen3, Heikki Seikkula4, Johan Lundin2, Mikael Lundin2, Stig Nordling5, Anna Bützow6, Hanna Vasarainen1, Peter J Boström4, Pekka Taimen3, Antti Rannikko1, Tuomas Mirtti2,5.   

Abstract

The clinical course of prostate cancer is highly variable. Current prognostic variables, stage, and Gleason score have limitations in assessing treatment regimens for individual patients, especially in the intermediate-risk group of Gleason score 7. ERG:TMPRSS2 fusion and loss of PTEN are some of the most common genetic alterations in prostate cancer. Immunohistochemistry of PTEN and ERG has generated interest as a promising method for more precise outcome prediction but requires further validation in population-based cohorts. We studied the predictive value of ERG and PTEN expression by immunohistochemistry in two large radical prostatectomy cohorts comprising 815 patients with extensive follow-up information. Clinical end points were initiation of secondary therapy, overall survival, and disease-specific survival. Predictions of clinical outcomes were also assessed according to androgen receptor (AR) activity. PTEN loss, especially in ERG-negative cancers, predicted initiation of secondary treatments and shortened disease-specific survival time, as well as stratifying Gleason score 7 patients into different prognostic groups with regard to secondary treatments and disease-specific survival. High AR immunoreactivity in ERG-negative cancers with PTEN loss predicted worse disease-specific survival. We also observed that in Gleason score 7 ERG-negative cases with PTEN loss and high AR expression have significantly shorter disease-specific survival time compared with ERG-positive cases. Our conclusion is that loss of PTEN is a strong determining factor for shorter disease-specific survival time and initiation of secondary therapies after radical prostatectomy. The predictive value of PTEN immunoreactivity is further accentuated in ERG-negative cancers with high AR expression. Negative PTEN expression, accompanied by ERG status, can be used to stratify patients with Gleason score 7 into different survival groups. Assessment of PTEN and ERG status could provide an additional tool for initial diagnostics when determining the prognosis and subsequent follow-up regimen for patients treated by radical prostatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27562498     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  37 in total

Review 1.  Tissue biomarkers for prognosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liuyang Zhao; Na Yu; Tianfang Guo; Yixuan Hou; Zongyue Zeng; Xiaorong Yang; Ping Hu; Xi Tang; Jian Wang; Manran Liu
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Genetic profiling to determine risk of relapse-free survival in high-risk localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christine M Barnett; Michael C Heinrich; Jeong Lim; Dylan Nelson; Carol Beadling; Andrea Warrick; Tanaya Neff; Celestia S Higano; Mark Garzotto; David Qian; Christopher L Corless; George V Thomas; Tomasz M Beer
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Genomic deletion of PTEN is associated with tumor progression and early PSA recurrence in ERG fusion-positive and fusion-negative prostate cancer.

Authors:  Antje Krohn; Tobias Diedler; Lia Burkhardt; Pascale-Sophie Mayer; Colin De Silva; Marie Meyer-Kornblum; Darja Kötschau; Pierre Tennstedt; Joseph Huang; Clarissa Gerhäuser; Malte Mader; Stefan Kurtz; Hüseyin Sirma; Fred Saad; Thomas Steuber; Markus Graefen; Christoph Plass; Guido Sauter; Ronald Simon; Sarah Minner; Thorsten Schlomm
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 4.  Genomic Predictors of Outcome in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Peter J Boström; Anders S Bjartell; James W F Catto; Scott E Eggener; Hans Lilja; Stacy Loeb; Jack Schalken; Thorsten Schlomm; Matthew R Cooperberg
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 5.  The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.

Authors:  Jonathan I Epstein; Lars Egevad; Mahul B Amin; Brett Delahunt; John R Srigley; Peter A Humphrey
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.394

6.  Clonal progression of prostate cancers from Gleason grade 3 to grade 4.

Authors:  Adam G Sowalsky; Huihui Ye; Glenn J Bubley; Steven P Balk
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Absence of TMPRSS2:ERG fusions and PTEN losses in prostate cancer is associated with a favorable outcome.

Authors:  Maisa Yoshimoto; Anthony M Joshua; Isabela W Cunha; Renata A Coudry; Francisco P Fonseca; Olga Ludkovski; Maria Zielenska; Fernando A Soares; Jeremy A Squire
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 7.842

8.  Cysteine-rich secretory protein 3 overexpression is linked to a subset of PTEN-deleted ERG fusion-positive prostate cancers with early biochemical recurrence.

Authors:  Katharina Grupp; Sebastian Kohl; Hüseyin Sirma; Ronald Simon; Stefan Steurer; Andreas Becker; Meike Adam; Jakob Izbicki; Guido Sauter; Sarah Minner; Thorsten Schlomm; Maria Christina Tsourlakis
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 7.842

9.  Assessing the order of critical alterations in prostate cancer development and progression by IHC: further evidence that PTEN loss occurs subsequent to ERG gene fusion.

Authors:  B Gumuskaya; B Gurel; H Fedor; H-L Tan; C A Weier; J L Hicks; M C Haffner; T L Lotan; A M De Marzo
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 5.554

10.  Prognostic value of PTEN loss in men with conservatively managed localised prostate cancer.

Authors:  J Cuzick; Z H Yang; G Fisher; E Tikishvili; S Stone; J S Lanchbury; N Camacho; S Merson; D Brewer; C S Cooper; J Clark; D M Berney; H Møller; P Scardino; Z Sangale
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Clinical implications of PTEN loss in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tamara Jamaspishvili; David M Berman; Ashley E Ross; Howard I Scher; Angelo M De Marzo; Jeremy A Squire; Tamara L Lotan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  ITGB1-dependent upregulation of Caveolin-1 switches TGFβ signalling from tumour-suppressive to oncogenic in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Teijo Pellinen; Sami Blom; Sara Sánchez; Katja Välimäki; John-Patrick Mpindi; Hind Azegrouz; Raffaele Strippoli; Raquel Nieto; Mariano Vitón; Irene Palacios; Riku Turkki; Yinhai Wang; Miguel Sánchez-Alvarez; Stig Nordling; Anna Bützow; Tuomas Mirtti; Antti Rannikko; María C Montoya; Olli Kallioniemi; Miguel A Del Pozo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Applications of Artificial Intelligence to Prostate Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI): Current and Emerging Trends.

Authors:  Michelle D Bardis; Roozbeh Houshyar; Peter D Chang; Alexander Ushinsky; Justin Glavis-Bloom; Chantal Chahine; Thanh-Lan Bui; Mark Rupasinghe; Christopher G Filippi; Daniel S Chow
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Fibroblast as a critical stromal cell type determining prognosis in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sami Blom; Andrew Erickson; Arne Östman; Antti Rannikko; Tuomas Mirtti; Olli Kallioniemi; Teijo Pellinen
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 5.  Grading Evolution and Contemporary Prognostic Biomarkers of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Konrad Sopyllo; Andrew M Erickson; Tuomas Mirtti
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  ARPC1B Is Associated with Lethal Prostate Cancer and Its Inhibition Decreases Cell Invasion and Migration In Vitro.

Authors:  Yaser Gamallat; Hend Zaaluk; Ealia Khosh Kish; Ramy Abdelsalam; Konstantinos Liosis; Sunita Ghosh; Tarek A Bismar
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Association of ERG/PTEN status with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Rohit Mehra; Simpa S Salami; Robert Lonigro; Ritu Bhalla; Javed Siddiqui; Xuhong Cao; Daniel E Spratt; Ganesh S Palapattu; Nallasivam Palanisamy; John T Wei; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Scott A Tomlins
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 3.064

8.  PTEN loss is associated with prostate cancer recurrence and alterations in tumor DNA methylation profiles.

Authors:  Milan S Geybels; Min Fang; Jonathan L Wright; Xiaoyu Qu; Marina Bibikova; Brandy Klotzle; Jian-Bing Fan; Ziding Feng; Elaine A Ostrander; Peter S Nelson; Janet L Stanford
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-09-15

9.  The Role of Immunohistochemical Analysis as a Tool for the Diagnosis, Prognostic Evaluation and Treatment of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Arie Carneiro; Álan Roger Gomes Barbosa; Lucas Seiti Takemura; Paulo Priante Kayano; Natasha Kouvaleski Saviano Moran; Carolina Ko Chen; Marcelo Langer Wroclawski; Gustavo Caserta Lemos; Isabela Werneck da Cunha; Marcos Takeo Obara; Marcos Tobias-Machado; Adam G Sowalsky; Bianca Bianco
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 10.  Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors in Prostate Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms, and Preclinical and Clinical Data.

Authors:  Dawid Sigorski; Ewa Iżycka-Świeszewska; Lubomir Bodnar
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 4.493

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.