Literature DB >> 27073512

ERG rearrangement as a novel marker for predicting the extra-prostatic extension of clinically localised prostate cancer.

L I Lu1, Hao Zhang1, Jun Pang1, Guo-Liang Hou1, Min-Hua Lu1, Xin Gao1.   

Abstract

Currently, there are no well-established preoperative clinicopathological parameters for predicting extra-prostatic extension (EPE) in patients with clinically localised prostate cancer (PCa). The transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2)-ETS-related gene (ERG) fusion gene is a specific biomarker of PCa and is considered a prognostic predictor. The aim of the present study was to assess the value of this marker for predicting EPE in patients with clinically localised PCa. In total, 306 PCa patients with clinically localised disease, including 220 patients (71.9%) with organ-confined disease and 86 EPE cases (28.1%), were included in the study. Receiver operating characteristic curves and logistic regression were employed to establish the optimal cut-off value and to investigate whether ERG rearrangement was an independent predictor for the EPE of clinically localised PCa. A leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) model was implemented to validate the predictive power of ERG rearrangement. An increase in ERG rearrangements was identified to be associate'd with EPE, and the optimal cut-off for predicting EPE was determined to be 2.25%, with a sensitivity of 70.24% [95% confidence interval (CI), 62.6-78.9%], a specificity of 80.43% (95% CI, 75.4-85.1%), and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.781 (95% CI, 0.730-0.826). In the LOOCV model, ERG rearrangement also demonstrated good performance for predicting EPE (sensitivity, 76.923%; specificity, 71.429%; 95% CI for AUC, 0.724-0.958). In addition, a high Gleason score (≥7) and a cT2c classification upon biopsy were independent factors for EPE.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERG rearrangement; clinically localised prostate cancer; extra-prostatic extension; prediction

Year:  2016        PMID: 27073512      PMCID: PMC4812447          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2016.4282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  40 in total

Review 1.  International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 3: extraprostatic extension, lymphovascular invasion and locally advanced disease.

Authors:  Cristina Magi-Galluzzi; Andrew J Evans; Brett Delahunt; Jonathan I Epstein; David F Griffiths; Theo H van der Kwast; Rodolfo Montironi; Thomas M Wheeler; John R Srigley; Lars L Egevad; Peter A Humphrey
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  External validation of the updated Partin tables in a cohort of North American men.

Authors:  Pierre I Karakiewicz; Naeem Bhojani; Umberto Capitanio; Alwyn M Reuther; Nazareno Suardi; Claudio Jeldres; Daniel Pharand; François Péloquin; Paul Perrotte; Shahrokh F Shariat; Eric A Klein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Quantification of extraprostatic extension in prostate cancer: different parameters correlated to biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Bianca A M H van Veggel; Inge M van Oort; J Alfred Witjes; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.087

4.  Staging and reporting of prostate cancer--sampling of the radical prostatectomy specimen.

Authors:  W A Sakr; T M Wheeler; M Blute; M Bodo; R Calle-Rodrigue; D E Henson; F K Mostofi; J Seiffert; K Wojno; H Zincke
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Predictors of extracapsular extension and positive margins in African American and white men.

Authors:  Edmond L Paquette; Roger R Connelly; Leon Sun; Laurence R Paquette; Judd W Moul
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.498

6.  Detection of TMPRSS2-ETS fusions by a multiprobe fluorescence in situ hybridization assay for the early diagnosis of prostate cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Qi-Peng Sun; Liao-Yuan Li; Zhong Chen; Jun Pang; Wei-Jiao Yang; Xiang-Fu Zhou; Jian-Guang Qiu; Zu-Lan Su; Dan He; Xin Gao
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 5.568

7.  FLI1 is a novel ETS transcription factor involved in gene fusions in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Paula Paulo; João D Barros-Silva; Franclim R Ribeiro; João Ramalho-Carvalho; Carmen Jerónimo; Rui Henrique; Guro E Lind; Rolf I Skotheim; Ragnhild A Lothe; Manuel R Teixeira
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  TMPRSS2:ERG fusion by translocation or interstitial deletion is highly relevant in androgen-dependent prostate cancer, but is bypassed in late-stage androgen receptor-negative prostate cancer.

Authors:  Karin G Hermans; Ronald van Marion; Herman van Dekken; Guido Jenster; Wytske M van Weerden; Jan Trapman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Prostate specific antigen versus prostate specific antigen density as a prognosticator of pathological characteristics and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ahmed Magheli; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Bruce J Trock; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Alan W Partin; Misop Han; Mark L Gonzalgo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Validation of the partin nomogram for prostate cancer in a national sample.

Authors:  James B Yu; Danil V Makarov; Richa Sharma; Richard E Peschel; Alan W Partin; Cary P Gross
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  2 in total

1.  Association between pathologic factors and ERG expression in prostate cancer: finding pivotal networking.

Authors:  Seung-Ryeol Lee; Young-Deuk Choi; Nam-Hoon Cho
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Association of PTEN expression with biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer: results based on previous reports.

Authors:  Haijie Xie; Bin Xie; Chunyu Liu; Jun Wang; Yong Xu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 4.147

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.