Literature DB >> 24395776

Genetic drift opposes mutualism during spatial population expansion.

Melanie J I Müller1, Beverly I Neugeboren, David R Nelson, Andrew W Murray.   

Abstract

Mutualistic interactions benefit both partners, promoting coexistence and genetic diversity. Spatial structure can promote cooperation, but spatial expansions may also make it hard for mutualistic partners to stay together, because genetic drift at the expansion front creates regions of low genetic and species diversity. To explore the antagonism between mutualism and genetic drift, we grew cross-feeding strains of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae on agar surfaces as a model for mutualists undergoing spatial expansions. By supplying varying amounts of the exchanged nutrients, we tuned strength and symmetry of the mutualistic interaction. Strong mutualism suppresses genetic demixing during spatial expansions and thereby maintains diversity, but weak or asymmetric mutualism is overwhelmed by genetic drift even when mutualism is still beneficial, slowing growth and reducing diversity. Theoretical modeling using experimentally measured parameters predicts the size of demixed regions and how strong mutualism must be to survive a spatial expansion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auxotroph; evolution; invasion; microbes; snow-drift game

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24395776      PMCID: PMC3903240          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1313285111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  35 in total

1.  A consumer-resource approach to the density-dependent population dynamics of mutualism.

Authors:  J Nathaniel Holland; Donald L DeAngelis
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.499

Review 2.  Five rules for the evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Phylogeography of post-Pleistocene population expansion in a fungus-gardening ant and its microbial mutualists.

Authors:  Alexander S Mikheyev; Tanya Vo; Ulrich G Mueller
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  Competition and cooperation in one-dimensional stepping-stone models.

Authors:  K S Korolev; David R Nelson
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  Geographic isolation trumps coevolution as a driver of yucca and yucca moth diversification.

Authors:  David M Althoff; Kari A Segraves; Christopher I Smith; James Leebens-Mack; Olle Pellmyr
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 4.286

6.  Rapid evolution of stability and productivity at the origin of a microbial mutualism.

Authors:  Kristina L Hillesland; David A Stahl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Translational selection and yeast proteome evolution.

Authors:  Hiroshi Akashi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genetic drift at expanding frontiers promotes gene segregation.

Authors:  Oskar Hallatschek; Pascal Hersen; Sharad Ramanathan; David R Nelson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Novel cooperation experimentally evolved between species.

Authors:  William Harcombe
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Emergent cooperation in microbial metabolism.

Authors:  Edwin H Wintermute; Pamela A Silver
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 11.429

View more
  72 in total

1.  Privatization of cooperative benefits stabilizes mutualistic cross-feeding interactions in spatially structured environments.

Authors:  Samay Pande; Filip Kaftan; Stefan Lang; Aleš Svatoš; Sebastian Germerodt; Christian Kost
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Collective Fluctuations in the Dynamics of Adaptation and Other Traveling Waves.

Authors:  Oskar Hallatschek; Lukas Geyrhofer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  A shared limiting resource leads to competitive exclusion in a cross-feeding system.

Authors:  Sarah P Hammarlund; Jeremy M Chacón; William R Harcombe
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 5.491

4.  Simulations reveal challenges to artificial community selection and possible strategies for success.

Authors:  Li Xie; Alex E Yuan; Wenying Shou
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 8.029

5.  Adding biotic complexity alters the metabolic benefits of mutualism.

Authors:  William R Harcombe; Alex Betts; Jason W Shapiro; Christopher J Marx
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Spatial gene drives and pushed genetic waves.

Authors:  Hidenori Tanaka; Howard A Stone; David R Nelson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Plant-fungal ecology. Niche engineering demonstrates a latent capacity for fungal-algal mutualism.

Authors:  Erik F Y Hom; Andrew W Murray
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Spatial structure, cooperation and competition in biofilms.

Authors:  Carey D Nadell; Knut Drescher; Kevin R Foster
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 60.633

9.  Spatially Constrained Growth Enhances Conversional Meltdown.

Authors:  Maxim O Lavrentovich; Mary E Wahl; David R Nelson; Andrew W Murray
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 10.  Building Spatial Synthetic Biology with Compartments, Scaffolds, and Communities.

Authors:  Jessica K Polka; Stephanie G Hays; Pamela A Silver
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 10.005

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.