Literature DB >> 24395277

What is a clear margin in breast conserving cancer surgery?

Helen Krontiras1, Rachael B Lancaster, Marshall M Urist.   

Abstract

OPINION STATEMENT: Team work is the key to successful breast conservation therapy. Patient education and the informed consent process should include a discussion about the importance of margin status. Specimen management is critically important to obtain the highest quality information about margins. Operating technique should avoid trauma to or disruption of the specimen surface. The specimen should be oriented for the pathologist using standard techniques including sutures, clips, or colored inks. Specimen radiography is mandatory to confirm complete resection of the target tissues and can be used to direct additional margin resections during the initial procedure. With a well-designed and oriented specimen, the pathologist can give an accurate description of the margin distance for both the invasive and in situ components of the cancer. In most cases, decision-making about margins will be straightforward. Positive margins should be re-excised or the treatment is converted to mastectomy. Clear margins (>5 mm) require no further surgical therapy. "Close" margins (1-4 mm) will remain a point of controversy because of conflicting reports from clinical series. At UAB, decision for re-excision is made on a case-by-case basis. Routinely 2 mm is considered adequate, however, volume of disease and intraductal component are important considerations when making recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24395277     DOI: 10.1007/s11864-013-0270-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol        ISSN: 1534-6277


  34 in total

1.  Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Melanie C Smitt; Kate Horst
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Continuing risk of ipsilateral breast relapse after breast-conserving therapy at long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Bas Kreike; Augustinus A M Hart; Tony van de Velde; Jacques Borger; Hans Peterse; Emiel Rutgers; Harry Bartelink; Marc J van de Vijver
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Attaining negative margins in breast-conservation operations: is there a consensus among breast surgeons?

Authors:  Sarah L Blair; Kari Thompson; Joseph Rococco; Vanessa Malcarne; Peter D Beitsch; David W Ollila
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial.

Authors:  J A van Dongen; A C Voogd; I S Fentiman; C Legrand; R J Sylvester; D Tong; E van der Schueren; P A Helle; K van Zijl; H Bartelink
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-07-19       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Twenty-five year results of the national cancer institute randomized breast conservation trial.

Authors:  Nicole L Simone; Tu Dan; Joanna Shih; Sharon L Smith; Linda Sciuto; Elena Lita; Marc E Lippman; Eli Glatstein; Sandra M Swain; David N Danforth; Kevin Camphausen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Ten-year results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer.

Authors:  J A Jacobson; D N Danforth; K H Cowan; T d'Angelo; S M Steinberg; L Pierce; M E Lippman; A S Lichter; E Glatstein; P Okunieff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-04-06       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Importance of routine cavity sampling in breast conservation surgery.

Authors:  J C Hewes; A Imkampe; A Haji; T Bates
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Positive surgical margins and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence predict disease-specific survival after breast-conserving therapy.

Authors:  Funda Meric; Nadeem Q Mirza; Georges Vlastos; Thomas A Buchholz; Henry M Kuerer; Gildy V Babiera; S Eva Singletary; Merrick I Ross; Frederick C Ames; Barry W Feig; Savitri Krishnamurthy; George H Perkins; Marsha D McNeese; Eric A Strom; Vicente Valero; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Influence of radiation dose on positive surgical margins in women undergoing breast conservation therapy.

Authors:  Steven J DiBiase; Lydia T Komarnicky; Dwight E Heron; Gordon F Schwartz; Carl M Mansfield
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Predictors of re-excision among women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer F Waljee; Emily S Hu; Lisa A Newman; Amy K Alderman
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  2 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of resection margin in specimen radiography: digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Giovanna Romanucci; Sara Mercogliano; Elisabetta Carucci; Alessandro Cina; Elisa Zantedeschi; Andrea Caneva; Chiara Benassuti; Francesca Fornasa
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Similar Outcomes of Standard Radiotherapy and Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Following Breast-Conserving Surgery.

Authors:  Hai-Ling Hou; Yong-Chun Song; Rui-Ying Li; Li Zhu; Lu-Jun Zhao; Zhi-Yong Yuan; Jin-Qiang You; Zhong-Jie Chen; Ping Wang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-08-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.