Literature DB >> 22113254

Twenty-five year results of the national cancer institute randomized breast conservation trial.

Nicole L Simone1, Tu Dan, Joanna Shih, Sharon L Smith, Linda Sciuto, Elena Lita, Marc E Lippman, Eli Glatstein, Sandra M Swain, David N Danforth, Kevin Camphausen.   

Abstract

Breast conservation therapy (BCT) consisting of lumpectomy and postoperative radiation has become an accepted alternative to mastectomy (MRM) for the treatment of early stage breast cancer. We currently report the 25 year outcomes of a single institution, prospective, randomized clinical trial at the National Cancer Institute. 237 women with pathologically confirmed invasive breast tumors 5 cm or less were accrued between 1979 and 1987 and randomized to receive either BCT or MRM. Overall survival was the primary endpoint. Patients with node positive disease were included and treated with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. Both arms received axillary dissection. BCT patients had radiation to the whole breast followed by a boost. At a median follow-up of 25.7 years, overall survival was 43.8% for the MRM group and 37.9% for BCT (P = 0.38). Although the cumulative incidence of a disease-free survival event was higher in BCT patients (29.0% MRM vs. 56.4% BCT, P = 0.0017), the additional treatment failures were primarily isolated ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences (IBTR's) requiring salvage mastectomy. 22.3% of BCT patients experienced an IBTR. Distant disease and second cancers were similar in both arms. After 25 years, long term survival between BCT and MRM continues to be similar in patients treated for early stage breast cancer. Patients receiving BCT may be at risk for additional treatment-related morbidity, which may occur as a late event. Further studies are required to delineate patients at higher risk for these events, and prolonged follow up should be encouraged after treatment for all women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22113254     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1867-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  24 in total

Review 1.  Is axillary lymph node clearance required in node-positive breast cancer?

Authors:  Nigel J Bundred; Nicola L P Barnes; Emiel Rutgers; Mila Donker
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  What is a clear margin in breast conserving cancer surgery?

Authors:  Helen Krontiras; Rachael B Lancaster; Marshall M Urist
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2014-03

3.  Comparative effectiveness of adrenal sparing radical nephrectomy and non-adrenal sparing radical nephrectomy in clear cell renal cell carcinoma: Observational study of survival outcomes.

Authors:  Gregory J Nason; Leon G Walsh; Ciaran E Redmond; Niall P Kelly; Barry B McGuire; Vidit Sharma; Michael E Kelly; David J Galvin; David W Mulvin; Gerald M Lennon; David M Quinlan; Hugh D Flood; Subhasis K Giri
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Disparities in the Initial Local Treatment of Older Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Traci J LeMasters; Suresh S Madhavan; Usha Sambamoorthi; Ami M Vyas
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 5.  Does Breast-Conserving Surgery with Radiotherapy have a Better Survival than Mastectomy? A Meta-Analysis of More than 1,500,000 Patients.

Authors:  Gabriel De la Cruz Ku; Manish Karamchandani; Diego Chambergo-Michilot; Alexis R Narvaez-Rojas; Michael Jonczyk; Fortunato S Príncipe-Meneses; David Posawatz; Salvatore Nardello; Abhishek Chatterjee
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 4.339

6.  Comparison of the Initial Loco-Regional Treatment Received for Early-Stage Breast Cancer between Elderly Women in Appalachia and a United States - Based Population: Good and Bad News.

Authors:  Traci LeMasters; S Suresh Madhavan; Usha Sambamoorthi
Journal:  Global J Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2016

7.  CD44 is prognostic for overall survival in the NCI randomized trial on breast conservation with 25 year follow-up.

Authors:  T Dan; S M Hewitt; N Ohri; D Ly; B P Soule; S L Smith; K Matsuda; C Council; U Shankavaram; M E Lippman; J B Mitchell; K Camphausen; N L Simone
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Local treatment for triple-negative breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: breast-conserving surgery or total mastectomy?

Authors:  Leqian Guo; Guilan Xie; Ruiqi Wang; Liren Yang; Landi Sun; Mengmeng Xu; Wenfang Yang; Mei Chun Chung
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia at the Margin of Lumpectomy Performed for Early Stage Breast Cancer: Is there Enough Evidence to Formulate Guidelines?

Authors:  Jennifer L Baker; Farnaz Hasteh; Sarah L Blair
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-12-04

10.  Surgical margins in breast conservation.

Authors:  Sheldon Marc Feldman
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-01-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.