Literature DB >> 19108003

Importance of routine cavity sampling in breast conservation surgery.

J C Hewes1, A Imkampe, A Haji, T Bates.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of cavity biopsy (CB) at the time of wide local excision (WLE) for primary breast cancer has not been evaluated fully. This study compared four groups of patients to determine the significance of margins and CB histology on tumour characteristics and outcome.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients undergoing WLE and CB in one institution over 21 years. Demographic data, tumour characteristics and survival information were obtained. Four subgroups of patients were compared according to their margin and cavity status (positive or negative).
RESULTS: A total of 957 patients had WLE. The median 10-year survival was 85.6 per cent and breast cancer-specific survival was 92.4 per cent. Tumour size, grade, node and oestrogen receptor status were independent predictors of survival. There was poor concordance between positivity of resection margins and CB (32.0 per cent); a negative margin carried a 10.8 per cent risk of demonstrable residual disease. A positive CB, but not a positive margin, was associated with reduced overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival.
CONCLUSION: Cavity status was more significant with regard to survival than margin status. CB is important in identifying residual and multifocal disease, as margin and cavity positivity are often not concordant. Copyright (c) 2008 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19108003     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  11 in total

Review 1.  What is a clear margin in breast conserving cancer surgery?

Authors:  Helen Krontiras; Rachael B Lancaster; Marshall M Urist
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2014-03

2.  Intraoperative Assessment of Final Margins with a Handheld Optical Imaging Probe During Breast-Conserving Surgery May Reduce the Reoperation Rate: Results of a Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Adam M Zysk; Kai Chen; Edward Gabrielson; Lorraine Tafra; Evelyn A May Gonzalez; Joseph K Canner; Eric B Schneider; Andrew J Cittadine; P Scott Carney; Stephen A Boppart; Kimiko Tsuchiya; Kristen Sawyer; Lisa K Jacobs
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Does cavity margin shaving reduce residual tumor and re-excision rates? A systematic review.

Authors:  M Fernandez-Pacheco; O Ortmann; A Ignatov; E C Inwald
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Impact of margin assessment method on positive margin rate and total volume excised.

Authors:  Tracy-Ann Moo; Lydia Choi; Candice Culpepper; Cristina Olcese; Alexandra Heerdt; Lisa Sclafani; Tari A King; Anne S Reiner; Sujata Patil; Edi Brogi; Monica Morrow; Kimberly J Van Zee
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Safe negative margin width in breast conservative therapy: results from a population with a high percentage of negative prognostic factors.

Authors:  Abu Bakar Bhatti; Amina Khan; Narjis Muzaffar; Neelam Siddiqui; Aamir Syed; Mazhar Shah; Awais Aamir; Arif Jamshed
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Influence of surgical technique on mastectomy and reexcision rates in breast-conserving therapy for cancer.

Authors:  Alison Unzeitig; Anne Kobbermann; Xian-Jin Xie; Jingsheng Yan; David Euhus; Yan Peng; Venetia Sarode; Amy Moldrem; A Marilyn Leitch; Valerie Andrews; Roshni Rao
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-01-16

7.  Breast conservation surgery: state of the art.

Authors:  Jonathan White; Raj Achuthan; Philip Turton; Mark Lansdown
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-09-04

8.  Standardized and reproducible methodology for the comprehensive and systematic assessment of surgical resection margins during breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Stephen P Povoski; Rafael E Jimenez; Wenle P Wang; Ronald X Xu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Toolbox to Reduce Lumpectomy Reoperations and Improve Cosmetic Outcome in Breast Cancer Patients: The American Society of Breast Surgeons Consensus Conference.

Authors:  Jeffrey Landercasper; Deanna Attai; Dunya Atisha; Peter Beitsch; Linda Bosserman; Judy Boughey; Jodi Carter; Stephen Edge; Sheldon Feldman; Joshua Froman; Caprice Greenberg; Cary Kaufman; Monica Morrow; Barbara Pockaj; Melvin Silverstein; Lawrence Solin; Alicia Staley; Frank Vicini; Lee Wilke; Wei Yang; Hiram Cody
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  HER-2 positive breast cancer is associated with an increased risk of positive cavity margins after initial lumpectomy.

Authors:  Haixia Jia; Weijuan Jia; Yaping Yang; Shunrong Li; Huiyi Feng; Jieqiong Liu; Nanyan Rao; Liang Jin; Jiannan Wu; Ru Gu; Liling Zhu; Kai Chen; Heran Deng; Yunjie Zeng; Qiang Liu; Erwei Song; Fengxi Su
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.