Peter O'Leary1, Susannah Maxwell1. 1. Research and Graduate Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) is to identify rare genetic and non-genetic conditions in children soon after birth in order to commence therapies that prevent the development of progressive, serious, and irreversible disabilities. Universal NBS programmes have been implemented in most countries, with minor adaptations to target conditions most relevant to the local healthcare environment. AIMS: In this article, we describe the initiatives of international and Australian governments to develop policies to address the expansion of NBS in their healthcare systems. METHODS: We have reviewed published public policies and literature to formulate recommendations based on clinical, social, legal, and ethical principles to inform a national governance and policy framework for Australia. RESULTS: Australian policy makers have been slow to develop a coordinated plan. While the experience from other governments can guide our national policy, there are specific areas that require further consideration by Australian health experts. Key reforms involve the separation of policy and operational activities, multidisciplinary decision-making and oversight by the Australian Health Ministers' Advisory Council for policy direction. CONCLUSION: A formal national policy framework will guide the coordination of NBS services that can adapt to the needs of Australian children and families.
BACKGROUND: The aim of newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) is to identify rare genetic and non-genetic conditions in children soon after birth in order to commence therapies that prevent the development of progressive, serious, and irreversible disabilities. Universal NBS programmes have been implemented in most countries, with minor adaptations to target conditions most relevant to the local healthcare environment. AIMS: In this article, we describe the initiatives of international and Australian governments to develop policies to address the expansion of NBS in their healthcare systems. METHODS: We have reviewed published public policies and literature to formulate recommendations based on clinical, social, legal, and ethical principles to inform a national governance and policy framework for Australia. RESULTS: Australian policy makers have been slow to develop a coordinated plan. While the experience from other governments can guide our national policy, there are specific areas that require further consideration by Australian health experts. Key reforms involve the separation of policy and operational activities, multidisciplinary decision-making and oversight by the Australian Health Ministers' Advisory Council for policy direction. CONCLUSION: A formal national policy framework will guide the coordination of NBS services that can adapt to the needs of Australian children and families.
Entities:
Keywords:
Newborn screening; genetics; health technology assessment; policy
Authors: Garry L Warne; Katrina L Armstrong; Thomas A Faunce; Bridget M Wilcken; Avihu Boneh; Elizabeth Geelhoed; Maria E Craig Journal: Med J Aust Date: 2010-01-18 Impact factor: 7.738
Authors: Martin B Delatycki; Jo Burke; Louise Christie; Felicity Collins; Michael Gabbett; Peter George; Eric Haan; Liane Ioannou; Nicole Martin; Fiona McKenzie; Peter O'Leary; Nicole Scoble-Williams; Gillian Turner; John Massie Journal: Twin Res Hum Genet Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 1.587
Authors: Beth K Potter; Pranesh Chakraborty; Jonathan B Kronick; Kumanan Wilson; Doug Coyle; Annette Feigenbaum; Michael T Geraghty; Maria D Karaceper; Julian Little; Aizeddin Mhanni; John J Mitchell; Komudi Siriwardena; Brenda J Wilson; Ania Syrowatka Journal: Genet Med Date: 2012-12-06 Impact factor: 8.822