| Literature DB >> 24393119 |
Carla Schmidt1, Carol V Robinson.
Abstract
Proteins undergo dynamic interactions with carbohydrates, lipids and nucleotides to form catalytic cores, fine-tuned for different cellular actions. The study of dynamic interactions between proteins and their cognate ligands is therefore fundamental to the understanding of biological systems. During the last two decades MS, and its associated techniques, has become accepted as a method for the study of protein-ligand interactions, not only for covalent complexes, where the use of MS is well established, but also, and significantly for protein-ligand interactions, for noncovalent assemblies. In this review, we employ a broad definition of a ligand to encompass protein subunits, drug molecules, oligonucleotides, carbohydrates, and lipids. Under the appropriate conditions, MS can reveal the composition, heterogeneity and dynamics of these protein-ligand interactions, and in some cases their structural arrangements and binding affinities. Herein, we highlight MS approaches for studying protein-ligand complexes, including those containing integral membrane subunits, and showcase examples from recent literature. Specifically, we tabulate the myriad of methodologies, including hydrogen exchange, proteomics, hydroxyl radical footprinting, intact complexes, and crosslinking, which, when combined with MS, provide insights into conformational changes and subtle modifications in response to ligand-binding interactions.Entities:
Keywords: MS; crosslinking; hydrogen-deuterium exchange; hydroxyl radical footprinting; protein complexes; protein-ligand interactions; proteomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24393119 PMCID: PMC4154455 DOI: 10.1111/febs.12707
Source DB: PubMed Journal: FEBS J ISSN: 1742-464X Impact factor: 5.542
An overview of methods used in structural MS to study protein–ligand complexes. The principles of the methods and the expected outcomes are described. Examples are given for each method.
| Method | Principle | Outcome | Examples |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proteomics | Digestion, LC‐MS/MS analysis of generated peptides, and database search of proteins from (purified) protein complexes | Identification of proteins in protein assemblies | Spliceosomal complexes |
| Quantitative proteomics | Labelling of proteins/peptides or label‐free approaches to compare or absolutely quantify proteins | Comparison of different complex assembly states. Identification of specific and nonspecific binders (relative quantification). Protein stoichiometries (absolute quantification) | Spliceosomal complexes |
| Hydrogen–deuterium exchange | Solvent‐accessible backbone hydrogens exchange with deuterium atoms from ‘heavy’ water. Analysis of intact proteins reveals differences (e.g. folded/unfolded state), and digestion and LC‐MS/MS analysis uncover protein sites that undergo exchange | Solvent accessibility | Calmodulin–Ca2+ interactions |
| Hydroxyl radical footprinting | Hydroxyl radicals react with accessible amino acid side chains to form oxidised residues. After digestion, the modified peptides (residues) are identified by LC‐MS/MS | Solvent accessibility | Cytochrome |
| Crosslinking | |||
| Chemical crosslinking | Bifunctional crosslinkers covalently link functional groups of neighbouring proteins. After digestion, crosslinked residues are identified by LC‐MS/MS and database search | Protein–protein interaction sites, distance restraints | Phosphatase 2A protein network |
| UV crosslinking | RNA (DNA) bases are excited by UV irradiation to form covalent bonds between bases and proteins in close proximity. Proteins and RNA are digested, and LC‐MS/MS analysis of the protein–RNA conjugate reveals the peptide sequence and the crosslinked RNA (DNA) base | Protein–RNA/DNA interaction sites | NusB–S10 |
| Native MS | MS analysis of intact protein complexes by the use of mass spectrometers modified for transmission of large protein assemblies | Protein stoichiometries, topology, heterogeneity, protein interactions, ligand interactions, stable protein subcomplexes | Ribosomes |
| IM‐MS | Determination of the drift time of proteins and protein complexes in the IM cell of the mass spectrometer, and conversion into CCSs | Shape/conformation of proteins and protein complexes. Conformational changes | TRAP complex |
Figure 1Structural MS and its various techniques. A multitude of structural MS techniques 1 have been applied and combined to study protein–ligand complexes – most of these have been coupled with computational modelling 7. Some recent examples are shown. The subunit stoichiometry and organisation of the CSM complex have been obtained from proteomics and IM‐MS of the intact complex. A model compatible with the available EM density map could thus be obtained [81]. Hydroxyl radical footprinting gave insights into neurotransmitter binding to the GPCR 5‐HT4. The schematic shows the GPCR with amino acids that were studied highlighted in red 33. The clamp loader complex was studied with IM‐MS and computational modelling, allowing construction of a three‐dimensional model of the fully assembled complex 59. Hydrogen–deuterium exchange was applied to study the effect of nucleotide binding on the conformation of the BmrA transporter. Hotspots for hydrogen‐deuterium exchange are represented by colour coding from cold to hot (blue < green < yellow < red) 25. Peptide binding probed by MS uncovered the threading mechanism through the bacterial OmpF 71. IM‐MS gave insights into specific lipid and drug binding to the P‐gp transporter 61. RNA–protein interactions in various spliceosomal complexes have been determined by combining UV‐crosslinking and proteomics. The model derived for the U1‐snRNA (red) in complex with U1‐specific proteins (grey space‐filling) is shown.
Figure 2Lipid binding to membrane protein complexes studied by MS. A sulfolipid was shown to bind specifically in the inner membrane ring of cATPase. The upper left model shows how the lipid is attached to the membrane ring subunit. Cardiolipins were found to bind to the membrane ring of V‐type ATPase in E. hirae. The ‘lipid plug’ reduces the inner cavity of the membrane ring to stabilise binding of the central stalk (upper right panel). MS reveals that the ABC transporter P‐gp binds up to six negatively charged diacylglycerides (e.g. POPA; lower right panel), which bind more favourably than zwitterionic lipids (e.g. DSPC; lower left panel).
Figure 3Nucleotide binding and occupancy of cATPase. (A) Mass spectrum of the intact F1‐ATPase and F1–δ‐ATPase. Peaks show splitting with a mass difference that can be attributed to the loss of ATP/ADP. Assignment of the peaks reveals populations of ATPases with two and three bound nucleotides. (B) The structure of the β/α‐interface. The catalytic binding site (P‐loop) is highlighted in red. A series of phosphosites were identified in the α‐subunit and β‐subunit (shown as yellow space‐filling), prompting the proposal that phosphorylation status controls access to nucleotide‐binding sites.
Figure 4TTX binding to cATPase. The upper mass spectra were acquired before (left) and after (right) incubation with TTX. Without TTX, the dominant complex species is the F1–δ‐cATPase. The intact F1 and F1–δ–ε complexes are present at lower intensities. The intensity of the intact F1‐cATPase increased after TTX binding, leading to two main complexes, the F1‐cATPase and the F1–δ‐cATPase. Upon CID fragmentation (lower mass spectra), the ε‐subunit dissociates, mainly yielding the F1–δ–ε‐cATPase without TTX (left). CID fragmentation of the TTX‐bound cATPase results in an intensity change of the CID products. Loss of the ε‐subunit in the TTX‐bound complex leads primarily to formation of the F1–ε complex. The crystal structures of the spinach ATPase with (Protein Data Bank ID PDB 1KMH, right) and without (Protein Data Bank ID PDB 1FX0, left) TTX, as well as the structure of TTX, are shown.