Literature DB >> 2439304

The effect of blur and contrast on VEP latency: comparison between check and sinusoidal and grating patterns.

P Bobak, I Bodis-Wollner, S Guillory.   

Abstract

Pattern defocusing was used to evaluate the contribution of different spatial frequency components in checks to VEP latency. Latency shifts with increasing blur (-2.5 to +2.5 diopters) were determined for sinusoidal grating and check patterns equated in fundamental spatial frequency. With both check and grating patterns, the effect of blur was greater the higher the spatial frequency. Given an equal fundamental spatial frequency, however, the latency of checks was more effected. This latency difference between check and sine patterns was pronounced at low fundamental spatial frequencies (large pattern) and decreased with higher spatial frequencies (small pattern). Latencies were then compared for patterns which were defocused vs. simply reduced in contrast. Results show that the increase in latency with defocused large checks is due to both fundamental and higher harmonic spatial components but with small checks, to the fundamental spatial frequency alone.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2439304     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(87)90045-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  17 in total

1.  Mechanism of binocular interaction in refraction errors: study using pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  A di Summa; S Fusina; L Bertolasi; S Vicentini; S Perlini; L G Bongiovanni; A Polo
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Comparison of the effects of Alzheimer's disease, normal aging and scopolamine on human transient visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  A T Smith; F Early; G H Jones
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Effect of defocusing and of distracted attention upon recordings of the visual evoked potential.

Authors:  Eedy Mezer; Yonatan Bahir; Rina Leibu; Ido Perlman
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Comparative effects of luminance and scatter on the pattern visual evoked potential and eye-hand reaction time.

Authors:  M McKerral; P Lachapelle; J Benoit
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  The effect of spatial frequency and contrast on the latency in the visual evoked potential.

Authors:  P Jakobsson; B Johansson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Effect of lens-induced myopia on visual cortex activity: a functional MR imaging study.

Authors:  A Mirzajani; E Sarlaki; H H Kharazi; M Tavan
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Simultaneously evoked primary and cognitive visual evoked potentials distinguish younger and older patients with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  A Antal; R Pfeiffer; I Bodis-Wollner
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.575

8.  Visual evoked cortical potential can be used to differentiate between uncorrected refractive error and macular disorders.

Authors:  I Perlman; E Segev; N Mazawi; T Merhav-Armon; B Lei; R Leibu
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Use of diffusing filters for artificially reducing visual acuity when testing equipment and procedures.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich; Isabell Strübin
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  Pattern visual evoked potentials in cases of ambiguous acuity loss.

Authors:  P Bobak; P Khanna; J Goodwin; M Brigell
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.