Literature DB >> 1591972

The effect of spatial frequency and contrast on the latency in the visual evoked potential.

P Jakobsson1, B Johansson.   

Abstract

The latency in the visual evoked potential was measured at spatial frequencies of 2-12 c/deg in 10 subjects. The contrast levels of the sinuosoidal grating patterns were set at 1.5, 1.75, 2.0, 2.25, 2.5, 2.75 and 3.0 log units above each subject's contrast sensitivity threshold. Two factors were shown to influence the latency: suprathreshold contrast and, to a lesser extent, spatial frequency. The visual evoked potential latencies at contrast sensitivity threshold were extrapolated. These threshold latencies showed considerable variation with spatial frequency and between subjects. Therefore, the visual evoked potential latency cannot be considered a useful tool for estimating the contrast sensitivity function.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1591972     DOI: 10.1007/bf00156577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  16 in total

1.  Visual evoked responses in humans with abnormal visual experience.

Authors:  R D Freeman; L N Thibos
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Amplitude and phase characteristics of the steady-state visual evoked potential.

Authors:  H Strasburger; W Scheidler; I Rentschler
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1988-03-15       Impact factor: 1.980

3.  Rapid assessment of visual function: an electronic sweep technique for the pattern visual evoked potential.

Authors:  C W Tyler; P Apkarian; D M Levi; K Nakayama
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Spatial frequency tuning in the visual evoked potential elicited by sine-wave gratings.

Authors:  J L Reed; M S Marx; J G May
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Measurement of contrast sensitivity function using pattern-reversal visual evoked responses.

Authors:  O Katsumi; T Tanino; T Hirose
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Visual-evoked responses elicited by the onset and offset of sinusoidal gratings: latency, waveform, and topographic characteristics.

Authors:  D M Parker; E A Salzen; J R Lishman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Binocular interaction in the VEP to grating stimulation. II. Spatial frequency effects.

Authors:  P Jakobsson; G Lennerstrand
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1985-06

8.  On the latency of human visually evoked response to sinusoidal gratings.

Authors:  A Vassilev; D Strashimirov
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Visual evoked response as a function of grating spatial frequency.

Authors:  R Jones; M J Keck
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Latency changes in the human visual evoked response to sinusoidal gratings.

Authors:  D M Parker; E A Salzen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  6 in total

1.  A study of the effects of contrast change on pattern VEPS, and the transition between onset, reversal and offset modes of stimulation.

Authors:  F S Shawkat; A Kriss
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Adaptation dynamics in pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  S P Heinrich; M Bach
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Visual evoked potentials and reaction time measurements to motion-reversal luminance- and texture-defined stimuli.

Authors:  Hadi Chakor; Armando Bertone; Michelle McKerral; Jocelyn Faubert; Pierre Lachapelle
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2005 Mar-May       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Comparison of P100 and P300 cortical potentials in spatial frequency discrimination.

Authors:  L Mehaffey; W Seiple; K Holopigian
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  The Influence of the Stimulus Design on the Harmonic Components of the Steady-State Visual Evoked Potential.

Authors:  Benjamin Solf; Stefan Schramm; Maren-Christina Blum; Sascha Klee
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Visual evoked cortical potential (VECP) elicited by sinusoidal gratings controlled by pseudo-random stimulation.

Authors:  Carolina S Araújo; Givago S Souza; Bruno D Gomes; Luiz Carlos L Silveira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.