Literature DB >> 11475365

Visual evoked cortical potential can be used to differentiate between uncorrected refractive error and macular disorders.

I Perlman1, E Segev, N Mazawi, T Merhav-Armon, B Lei, R Leibu.   

Abstract

The visual evoked cortical potential (VECP) is widely used to verify complaints of reduced visual performance and to identify the site of the disorder. In this study, we investigated the correlation between reduced visual acuity and VECP in volunteers with normal corrected visual acuity and in patients suffering from inherited macular degeneration or from age related macular degeneration (ARMD). Flash evoked VECP was not affected by the visual acuity in the cases of refractive error and in ARMD patients but was reduced in amplitude and delayed in implicit time in the patients suffering from inherited macular degeneration. The VECP elicited by pattern reversal checkerboard (PVECP) was not affected by the quality of the visual image in volunteers with uncorrected refractive error when checks of 60' or larger were used but were considerably reduced in size and prolonged in implicit time for checks smaller than 15'. In both groups of patients suffering from macular dysfunction, pattern reversal VECP was very subnormal and was characterized by prolonged implicit time compared to values expected from their visual acuity. These findings indicate that the PVECP does not directly correlate with visual acuity but rather with foveal function. Therefore, we suggest that recordings of PVECP can be used to differentiate between refractive error and macular disorders as causing reduction in visual acuity when other clinical signs are missing or not available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11475365     DOI: 10.1023/a:1017539308389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  18 in total

1.  Effects of aging on visual evoked responses.

Authors:  G G Celesia; R F Daly
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1977-07

2.  Evoked cortical responses to checkerboard patterns: effect of check-size as a function of visual acuity.

Authors:  M R Harter; C T White
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1970-01

3.  The effects of maturation and aging on the wave form of visually evoked potentials.

Authors:  R E Dustman; E C Beck
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1969-01

4.  Contrast evoked responses in man.

Authors:  H Spekreijse; L H van der Twell; T Zuidema
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Age-related changes in the latency of the visual evoked potential: influence of check size.

Authors:  S Sokol; A Moskowitz; V L Towle
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-05

6.  Steady-state and transient visual evoked potentials in clinical practice.

Authors:  G G Celesia
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Effect of refractive error on the visual evoked response.

Authors:  D W Collins; W M Carroll; J L Black; M Walsh
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-01-27

Review 8.  Visually evoked potentials: theory, techniques and clinical applications.

Authors:  S Sokol
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1976 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.048

9.  Delayed visual evoked potentials are independent of pattern orientation in macular disease.

Authors:  I Bodis-Wollner; R G Feldman; S L Guillory; L Mylin
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-05
View more
  3 in total

1.  Effect of defocusing and of distracted attention upon recordings of the visual evoked potential.

Authors:  Eedy Mezer; Yonatan Bahir; Rina Leibu; Ido Perlman
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  The parameters of pattern visual evoked potential in the severe visual loss patients in Korean.

Authors:  Min Kyung Kim; Ungsoo Samuel Kim
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-20

3.  Vision before and after scharioth macular lens implantation in patients with AMD: an electrophysiological study.

Authors:  Jan Kremláček; Jana Nekolová; Markéta Středová; Jana Langrová; Jana Szanyi; Miroslav Kuba; Zuzana Kubová; František Vít; Petr Voda; Martina Veselá; Naďa Jirásková
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.