Literature DB >> 2909569

Ventricular defibrillation using biphasic waveforms: the importance of phasic duration.

A S Tang1, S Yabe, J M Wharton, M Dolker, W M Smith, R E Ideker.   

Abstract

Biphasic waveforms can be used to defibrillate the heart with less energy than that used by monophasic waveforms. In 14 anesthetized open chest dogs with large contoured defibrillation electrodes, the effect on defibrillation efficacy of varying the duration of the two phases of biphasic waveforms was studied. All combinations of 0, 1, 3.5, 6 and 8.5 ms duration were used for both the first and the second phase except for the meaningless case in which both durations were 0 ms. The 3.5-2 waveform (3.5 ms first phase and 2 ms second phase) was also tested. All the hearts were defibrillated with less than or equal to 5 joules using any of the 25 waveforms. However, biphasic waveforms with the second phase shorter than or equal to the first had significantly lower defibrillation thresholds than did those with the second phase longer than the first or than did monophasic waveforms of approximately the same total duration. A plot of defibrillation threshold current strength versus second phase duration for all biphasic waveforms with a 3.5 ms first phase did not produce a hyperbolic strength-duration curve as seen with monophasic waveforms. To verify these findings, defibrillation dose-response curves were obtained for the 3.5-2, 6-6 and 3.5-8.5 biphasic waveforms in another six dogs. The 50 and 80% successful voltage doses of the 3.5-8.5 waveforms were significantly higher than those of the other two waveforms, which were not different from one another.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2909569     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(89)90572-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  8 in total

1.  Shock-induced termination of reentrant cardiac arrhythmias: comparing monophasic and biphasic shock protocols.

Authors:  Jean Bragard; Ana Simic; Jorge Elorza; Roman O Grigoriev; Elizabeth M Cherry; Robert F Gilmour; Niels F Otani; Flavio H Fenton
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.642

2.  Optimal biphasic waveforms for internal defibrillation using a 60 muF capacitor.

Authors:  Yoshio Yamanouchi; Stéphane X Garrigue; Kent A Mowrey; Bruce L Wilkoff; Patrick J Tchou
Journal:  Exp Clin Cardiol       Date:  2002

3.  Spatial potential and current distributions along transvenous defibrillation electrodes: variation of electrode characteristics.

Authors:  R Pendekanti; C S Henriquez
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Mechanisms of cardiac cell excitation with premature monophasic and biphasic field stimuli: a model study.

Authors:  M G Fishler; E A Sobie; N V Thakor; L Tung
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Does reducing capacitance have potential for further miniaturisation of implantable defibrillators?

Authors:  E Alt; F Evans; P D Wolf; J Pasquantonio; L Stotts; S Heinz; A Schömig
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  [Mechanisms of electrical defibrillation].

Authors:  S Reek; R E Ideker
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1997-03

7.  Role of proximal electrode position in transvenous ventricular defibrillation.

Authors:  J Nitta; D S Khoury
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 8.  Optimizing defibrillation waveforms for ICDs.

Authors:  Mark W Kroll; Charles D Swerdlow
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 1.900

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.