Literature DB >> 10479536

The biphasic mystery: why a biphasic shock is more effective than a monophasic shock for defibrillation.

J P Keener1, T J Lewis.   

Abstract

We demonstrate that a biphasic shock is more effective than a monophasic shock at eliminating reentrant electrical activity in an ionic model of cardiac ventricular electrical activity. This effectiveness results from early hyperpolarization that enhances the recovery of sodium inactivation, thereby enabling earlier activation of recovering cells. The effect can be seen easily in a model of a single cell and also in a cable model with a ring of excitable cells. Finally, we demonstrate the phenomenon in a two-dimensional model of cardiac tissue. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10479536     DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.1999.0972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  1 in total

1.  Shock-induced termination of reentrant cardiac arrhythmias: comparing monophasic and biphasic shock protocols.

Authors:  Jean Bragard; Ana Simic; Jorge Elorza; Roman O Grigoriev; Elizabeth M Cherry; Robert F Gilmour; Niels F Otani; Flavio H Fenton
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.642

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.