Literature DB >> 12596639

Spatial micromovements of uncemented femoral components after torsional loads.

W Görtz1, U V Nägerl, H Nägerl, M Thomsen.   

Abstract

A novel method is presented which permits to assess implanted femoral components with regards to location of fixation and initial stability under cyclic torsional loads. The measurement apparatus tracks the spatial movement at several sites of stem and bone, allowing quantitative analysis of the micromotions and twisting of stem and bone, and the location of torque (force) transfer. Four types of prostheses were compared, which revealed striking differences in torque transfer. Our results for synthetic femurs are consistent with in vivo data on the osseointegration and radiolucensies observed for the stem types of this study. The method can be used to quantitatively compare various stem designs and implantation techniques.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12596639     DOI: 10.1115/1.1517565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  9 in total

1.  [Revision hip stems: an analysis of the fixation].

Authors:  M Thomsen; J P Kretzer; C Heisel; C Lee; J Nadorf; E Jakubowitz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Influence of stem design on the primary stability of megaprostheses of the proximal femur.

Authors:  Stefan Kinkel; Jan Dennis Graage; Jan Philippe Kretzer; Eike Jakubowitz; Jan Nadorf
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Fixation pattern of conical and cylindrical modular revision hip stems in different size bone defects.

Authors:  Stefan Kinkel; Jan Nadorf; Marc N Thomsen; Christian Heisel; Alexander Jahnke; Jan P Kretzer; Eike Jakubowitz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  The influence of cementing technique in hip resurfacing arthroplasty on the initial stability of the femoral component.

Authors:  Rudi G Bitsch; Sebastian Jäger; Marcus Lürssen; Travis Loidolt; Thomas P Schmalzried; Stefan Weiss
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Can the metaphyseal anchored Metha short stem safely be revised with a standard CLS stem? A biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Shuang G Yan; Matthias Woiczinski; Tobias F Schmidutz; Patrick Weber; Alexander C Paulus; Arnd Steinbrück; Volkmar Jansson; Florian Schmidutz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Strut grafts in revision hip arthroplasty faced with femoral bone defects: an experimental analysis.

Authors:  Stefan Kinkel; Marc N Thomsen; Jan Nadorf; Christian Heisel; Michael C Tanner; Eike Jakubowitz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Primary stability of the Fitmore stem: biomechanical comparison.

Authors:  Wojciech Pepke; Jan Nadorf; Volker Ewerbeck; Marcus R Streit; Stefan Kinkel; Tobias Gotterbarm; Michael W Maier; J Philippe Kretzer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Primary rotational stability of various megaprostheses in a biomechanical sawbone model with proximal femoral defects extending to the isthmus.

Authors:  Stefan Kinkel; Jan Nadorf; Jan Dennis Graage; Eike Jakubowitz; Jan Philippe Kretzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Tibial revision knee arthroplasty with metaphyseal sleeves: The effect of stems on implant fixation and bone flexibility.

Authors:  Jan Nadorf; Stefan Kinkel; Simone Gantz; Eike Jakubowitz; J Philippe Kretzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.