Dietmar Dammerer1, Alexander Wurm2, Clemens Frischhut1, Johannes Petersen3, Miar Ouaret3, Michael Liebensteiner1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. 2. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria; alexander.wurm@i-med.ac.at. 3. Department. of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the clinical outcome and the osseous union of strut onlay allografts (SOAs) used as adjunct in revision total joint arthroplasty (TJA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients that had previously undergone SOA augmentation were considered for inclusion. Patients were invited to provide information for the following: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), EuroQol five dimension score (EQ-5D) and Parker mobility score. Osseous union rates between SOA and the host bone were determined by radiograph with the Emerson classification system. Bone mineral density was measured via quantitative computed tomography. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were identified, at a mean follow-up of 2.8 years. The median total WOMAC score was 22 [interquartile range (IQR)=21]. The median EQ-5D score was 0.887 (IQR=0.350) (time trade-off). The Parker Mobility Score was 8.0 (IQR=3.5). Emerson stages of radiographic graft to host union were 'rounding off' in one case, 'partial bridging' in three and 'complete bridging' in 13. Quantitative computed tomography showed an average bone mineral density of approximately 1,300 mg/cm3. CONCLUSION: From our findings, it is concluded that SOAs used in revision total joint arthroplasty provide promising results and are recommended for broader clinical use. A complete osseous union between host and graft bone was observed in the majority of cases.
AIM: To evaluate the clinical outcome and the osseous union of strut onlay allografts (SOAs) used as adjunct in revision total joint arthroplasty (TJA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients that had previously undergone SOA augmentation were considered for inclusion. Patients were invited to provide information for the following: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), EuroQol five dimension score (EQ-5D) and Parker mobility score. Osseous union rates between SOA and the host bone were determined by radiograph with the Emerson classification system. Bone mineral density was measured via quantitative computed tomography. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were identified, at a mean follow-up of 2.8 years. The median total WOMAC score was 22 [interquartile range (IQR)=21]. The median EQ-5D score was 0.887 (IQR=0.350) (time trade-off). The Parker Mobility Score was 8.0 (IQR=3.5). Emerson stages of radiographic graft to host union were 'rounding off' in one case, 'partial bridging' in three and 'complete bridging' in 13. Quantitative computed tomography showed an average bone mineral density of approximately 1,300 mg/cm3. CONCLUSION: From our findings, it is concluded that SOAs used in revision total joint arthroplasty provide promising results and are recommended for broader clinical use. A complete osseous union between host and graft bone was observed in the majority of cases.