Literature DB >> 24381087

Comparing movement preparation of unimanual, bimanual symmetric, and bimanual asymmetric movements.

Jarrod Blinch1, Brendan D Cameron, Erin K Cressman, Ian M Franks, Mark G Carpenter, Romeo Chua.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to determine the process or processes most likely to be involved in reaction-time costs for spatially cued bimanual reaching. We used reaction time to measure the cost of bimanual symmetric movements compared to unimanual movements (a bimanual symmetric cost) and the cost for bimanual asymmetric movements compared to symmetric movements (a bimanual asymmetric cost). The results showed that reaction times were comparable for all types of movements in simple reaction time; that is, there was neither a bimanual symmetric cost nor an asymmetric cost. Therefore, unimanual, bimanual symmetric, and bimanual asymmetric movements have comparable complexity during response initiation. In choice conditions, there was no bimanual symmetric cost but there was a bimanual asymmetric cost, indicating that the preparation of asymmetric movements is more complex than symmetric movements. This asymmetric cost is likely the result of interference during response programming.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24381087     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3807-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  35 in total

1.  Bimanual cross-talk during reaching movements is primarily related to response selection, not the specification of motor parameters.

Authors:  Eliot Hazeltine; Joern Diedrichsen; Steven W Kennerley; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2002-11-26

2.  The persistence of underpowered studies in psychological research: causes, consequences, and remedies.

Authors:  Scott E Maxwell
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2004-06

3.  Rapid visual feedback processing in single-aiming movements.

Authors:  H Z Zelaznik; B Hawkins; L Kisselburgh
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  The influence of movement cues on intermanual interactions.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer; Wolfhard Klein
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-08-05

5.  Intermanual interactions related to movement amplitudes and endpoint locations.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer; Wolfhard Klein
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.328

6.  The coordination of bimanual aiming movements: evidence for progressive desynchronization.

Authors:  B Fowler; T Duck; M Mosher; B Mathieson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1991-05

7.  Effects of force output and preparatory set on premotor time of simultaneous bilateral responses.

Authors:  S Kawabe
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1989-04

8.  On the coordination of two-handed movements.

Authors:  J A Kelso; D L Southard; D Goodman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  The utilization of visual feedback information during rapid pointing movements.

Authors:  D Elliott; F Allard
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1985-08

10.  Are movements prepared in parts? Not under compatible (naturalized) conditions.

Authors:  D Goodman; J A Kelso
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1980-12
View more
  6 in total

1.  Facilitation and interference during the preparation of bimanual movements: contributions from starting locations, movement amplitudes, and target locations.

Authors:  Jarrod Blinch; Brendan D Cameron; Ian M Franks; Mark G Carpenter; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-11-12

2.  Bimanual joint action: correlated timing or "bimanual" movements accomplished by two people.

Authors:  Melanie Y Lam; Jarrod Blinch; Elizabeth M Connors; Jon B Doan; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Unified nature of bimanual movements revealed by separating the preparation of each arm.

Authors:  Jarrod Blinch; Ian M Franks; Mark G Carpenter; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Complexity of movement preparation and the spatiotemporal coupling of bimanual reach-to-grasp movements.

Authors:  Jarrod Blinch; Jon B Doan; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Effects of integrated feedback on discrete bimanual movements in choice reaction time.

Authors:  Jarrod Blinch; Guilherme de Cellio Martins; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Increased cognitive demands boost the spatial interference effect in bimanual pointing.

Authors:  Ioana Stanciu; Stefanie C Biehl; Constanze Hesse
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-03-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.