Literature DB >> 25850406

Unified nature of bimanual movements revealed by separating the preparation of each arm.

Jarrod Blinch1, Ian M Franks, Mark G Carpenter, Romeo Chua.   

Abstract

Movement preparation of bimanual asymmetric movements is longer than bimanual symmetric movements in choice reaction time conditions, even when movements are cued directly by illuminating the targets (Blinch et al. in Exp Brain Res 232(3):947-955, 2014). This bimanual asymmetric cost may be caused by increased processing demands on response programming, but this requires further investigation. The present experiment tested the demands on response programming for bimanual movements by temporally separating the preparation of each arm. This was achieved by precuing the target of one arm before the imperative stimulus. We asked: What was prepared in advance when one arm was precued? The answer to this question would suggest which process causes the bimanual asymmetric cost. Advance movement preparation was examined by comparing reaction times with and without a precue for the left target and by occasionally replacing the imperative stimulus with a loud, startling tone (120 dB). A startle tone releases whatever movement is prepared in advance with a much shorter reaction time than control trials (Carlsen et al. in Clin Neurophysiol 123(1):21-33, 2012). Participants made bimanual symmetric and asymmetric reaching movements in simple and 2-choice reaction time conditions and a condition with a precue for the left target. We found a bimanual asymmetric cost in 2-choice conditions, and the asymmetric cost was significantly smaller when the left target was precued. These results, and the results from startle trials, suggest (1) that the precued movement was not fully programmed but partially programmed before the imperative stimulus and (2) that the asymmetric cost was caused by increased processing demands on response programming. Overall, the results support the notion that bimanual movements are not the sum of two unimanual movements; instead, the two arms of a bimanual movement are unified into a functional unit. When one target is precued, this critical unification likely occurs during response programming.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25850406     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4266-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  28 in total

1.  Bimanual Fitts' tasks: Kelso, Southard, and Goodman, 1979 revisited.

Authors:  Charles H Shea; Jason Boyle; Attila J Kovacs
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Default motor preparation under conditions of response uncertainty.

Authors:  Christopher J Forgaard; Dana Maslovat; Anthony N Carlsen; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Neural correlates of reaching decisions in dorsal premotor cortex: specification of multiple direction choices and final selection of action.

Authors:  Paul Cisek; John F Kalaska
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Can prepared responses be stored subcortically?

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Romeo Chua; J Timothy Inglis; David J Sanderson; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The influence of movement cues on intermanual interactions.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer; Wolfhard Klein
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-08-05

6.  Partial advance information and response preparation: inferences from the lateralized readiness potential.

Authors:  H Leuthold; W Sommer; R Ulrich
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1996-09

Review 7.  Gestalt principles in the control of motor action.

Authors:  Stuart T Klapp; Richard J Jagacinski
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  On the coordination of two-handed movements.

Authors:  J A Kelso; D L Southard; D Goodman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 9.  Preparation for voluntary movement in healthy and clinical populations: evidence from startle.

Authors:  Anthony N Carlsen; Dana Maslovat; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Patterned ballistic movements triggered by a startle in healthy humans.

Authors:  J Valls-Solé; J C Rothwell; F Goulart; G Cossu; E Muñoz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-05-01       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effects of integrated feedback on discrete bimanual movements in choice reaction time.

Authors:  Jarrod Blinch; Guilherme de Cellio Martins; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The left cerebral hemisphere may be dominant for the control of bimanual symmetric reach-to-grasp movements.

Authors:  Jarrod Blinch; Jason W Flindall; Łukasz Smaga; Kwanghee Jung; Claudia Lr Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 1.972

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.