Literature DB >> 16531395

Intermanual interactions related to movement amplitudes and endpoint locations.

Herbert Heuer1, Wolfhard Klein.   

Abstract

In almost all studies of bimanual movements with same and different amplitudes, the difference between amplitudes has been confounded with a difference between endpoint locations. The present authors varied those parameters orthogonally. In addition, they presented target locations on the surface on which the movements were produced (direct cues) and on a monitor (indirect cues). Participants' (N = 12) reaction times were longer when both amplitudes and endpoint locations differed than when they were the same. Intermanual amplitude correlations were reduced whenever 1 of the movement parameters differed for the 2 hands; only when cues were presented on the monitor was the amplitude correlation further reduced when both movement parameters were different. The results indicate that structural constraints on bimanual movements take effect on both amplitudes and endpoint locations. The relative importance of those 2 parameters is largely independent of the type of cue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16531395     DOI: 10.3200/JMBR.38.2.126-138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  9 in total

1.  Bimanual Fitts' tasks: Kelso, Southard, and Goodman, 1979 revisited.

Authors:  Charles H Shea; Jason Boyle; Attila J Kovacs
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Perception and action influences on discrete and reciprocal bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Charles H Shea; John J Buchanan; Deanna M Kennedy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

3.  Multiple frames of reference for bimanual co-ordination.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Comparing movement preparation of unimanual, bimanual symmetric, and bimanual asymmetric movements.

Authors:  Jarrod Blinch; Brendan D Cameron; Erin K Cressman; Ian M Franks; Mark G Carpenter; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Amplitude differences, spatial assimilation, and integrated feedback in bimanual coordination.

Authors:  Attila J Kovacs; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Facilitation and interference during the preparation of bimanual movements: contributions from starting locations, movement amplitudes, and target locations.

Authors:  Jarrod Blinch; Brendan D Cameron; Ian M Franks; Mark G Carpenter; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-11-12

7.  Moving further moves things further away in visual perception: position-based movement planning affects distance judgments.

Authors:  Wladimir Kirsch; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Movement order and saccade direction affect a common measure of eye-hand coordination in bimanual reaching.

Authors:  Eric Mooshagian; Cunguo Wang; Afreen Ferdoash; Lawrence H Snyder
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Response preparation changes following practice of an asymmetrical bimanual movement.

Authors:  Dana Maslovat; Anthony N Carlsen; Ryu Ishimoto; Romeo Chua; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 1.972

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.