Literature DB >> 6449532

Are movements prepared in parts? Not under compatible (naturalized) conditions.

D Goodman, J A Kelso.   

Abstract

This set of experiments is concerned with the specification of movement parameters hypothesized to be involved in the initiation of movement. Experiment 1 incorporated the precuing method developed by Rosenbaum in which a precue provided partial information of the upcoming movement before the stimulus to move. Under conditions in which precues were provided by letter symbols and stimuli were color-coded dots mapped to response keys. Rosenbaum found reaction times to be slower for the specification of arm than for direction, and both to be slower than the specification of extent. In Experiment 1, using precue and stimulus conditions that paralleled those employed by Rosenbaum, we obtained very similar findings. The three follow-up experiments extended these findings to more naturalized stimulus-response compatible conditions. We used a method in which precues and stimuli were directly specified through vision and mapped in a one-to-one manner with responses. In Experiment 2, although reacion times decreased as a function of the number of parameters precued, there were no systematic effects of precuing particular parameters. In Experiments 3 and 4, we incorported an ambiguous precue that, while serving to reduce task uncertainty, failed to provide any specific information as to the arm, direction, or extent of the upcoming movement. Initiation times did not systematically vary as a function of the type of parameter precued nor were there significant differences between specific and ambiguous precue conditions. In sum, only in Experiment 1 in which precues and stimuli involved complex cognitive transformations was there support for Rosenbaum's parameter specification model. When we employed highly compatible conditions, designed to reflect a real-world environment, we failed to obtain any tendency for movement parameters to be serially specified. We discuss grounds for suspecting the generality of parameter specification models and propose an alternative approach that is consonant with the dynamic characteristics of the motor control system.

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6449532     DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.109.4.475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  34 in total

1.  Motor control prior to movement onset: preparatory mechanisms for pointing at visual targets.

Authors:  O Bock; K Arnold
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  What to do and how to do it: action representations in tool use.

Authors:  Cristina Massen; Christine Sattler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Default motor preparation under conditions of response uncertainty.

Authors:  Christopher J Forgaard; Dana Maslovat; Anthony N Carlsen; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Conceptual unifying constraints override sensorimotor interference during anticipatory control of bimanual actions.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Franz; Robert McCormick
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Selection of wrist posture in conditions of motor ambiguity.

Authors:  Daniel K Wood; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  On the relations between single cell activity in the motor cortex and the direction and magnitude of three-dimensional dynamic isometric force.

Authors:  Jyl Boline; James Ashe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The influence of movement cues on intermanual interactions.

Authors:  Herbert Heuer; Wolfhard Klein
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-08-05

8.  A deficit in older adults' effortful selection of cued responses.

Authors:  Robert W Proctor; Kim-Phuong L Vu; David F Pick
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.328

9.  Comparing movement preparation of unimanual, bimanual symmetric, and bimanual asymmetric movements.

Authors:  Jarrod Blinch; Brendan D Cameron; Erin K Cressman; Ian M Franks; Mark G Carpenter; Romeo Chua
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The programming of structural properties of movement sequences.

Authors:  M Ziessler; K Hänel; D Sachse
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1990
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.