Literature DB >> 24378850

DNA repair gene XRCC4 codon 247 polymorphism modified diffusely infiltrating astrocytoma risk and prognosis.

Zhong-Hui Lin1, Jin-Chun Chen2, Yun-Sun Wang3, Teng-Jiao Huang4, Jin Wang5, Xi-Dai Long6.   

Abstract

The DNA repair gene X-ray cross-complementary group 4 (XRCC4), an important caretaker of the overall genome stability, is thought to play a major role in human tumorigenesis. We investigated the association between an important polymorphic variant of this gene at codon 247 (rs373409) and diffusely infiltrating astrocytoma (DIA) risk and prognosis. This hospital-based case-control study investigated this association in the Guangxi population. In total, 242 cases with DIA and 358 age-, sex-, and race-matched healthy controls were genotyped using TaqMan-PCR technique. We found a significant difference in the frequency of XRCC4 genotypes between cases and controls. Compared with the homozygote of XRCC4 codon 247 Ala alleles (XRCC4-AA), the genotypes of XRCC4 codon 247 Ser alleles (namely XRCC4-AS or -SS) increased DIA risk (odds ratios [OR], 1.82 and 2.89, respectively). Furthermore, XRCC4 polymorphism was correlated with tumor dedifferentiation of DIA (r = 0.261, p < 0.01). Additionally, this polymorphism modified the overall survival of DIA patients (the median survival times were 26, 14, and 8 months for patients with XRCC4-AA, -AS, and -SS, respectively). Like tumor grade, XRCC4 codon 247 polymorphism was an independent prognostic factor influencing the survival of DIA. These results suggest that XRCC4 codon 247 polymorphism may be associated with DIA risk and prognosis among the Guangxi population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24378850      PMCID: PMC3907808          DOI: 10.3390/ijms15010250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Mol Sci        ISSN: 1422-0067            Impact factor:   5.923


Introduction

Tumors from the central nervous system represent approximately 2% of all cancers, with an estimated 4.2 to 5.4 per 100,000 individuals affected per year [1,2]. Among these tumors, diffusely infiltrating astrocytoma (DIA) is the most common type, which comprises approximately 60% of primary brain tumors [1,3]. In relatively high incidence areas of DIA, such as Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous region, China, this tumor accounts for 70 percent of primary brain tumors. According to our not published epidemiological data, during May 2005 to April 2008, incidence rates and death rates of DIA were about 10/10,000 and eight to nine per 10,000 in some areas of Guangxi, respectively. DIA varies considerably in its epidemiological features, morphologic attributes, growth patterns, genetic profiles, and clinic behavior. Histopathologically, this tumor is divided into three groups: low-grade astrocytoma (the World Health Organization [WHO] Grade II), anaplastic astrocytoma (WHO Grade III), and glioblastoma (WHO Grade IV) [3]. Despite improvements in diagnosis and treatment, the prognosis of DIA remains dismal with a 5-year survival rate of less than 30% [1]. There is a paucity of information on the etiology of this tumor. Epidemiological studies have shown that occupations, environmental carcinogens, diet, and ionizing radiation can elevate DIA risk [1-5]. These factors can induce various types of DNA damage, including DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) [6-8]. This suggests that an individual susceptibility related to genetic factors (e.g., DNA repair capacity) might be associated with DIA tumorigenesis [3]. The nonhomologous end-joining repair (NHEJ) genes play an important role in the repair of DSBs resulting from exogenous attacks [9,10], and might be important cancer-correlated genetic factors [6,11-13]. While DNA repair gene x-ray repair cross-complementary Group 4, a key component of NHEJ pathway, is found to restore DNA double-strand break repair and has the ability to support V(D)J recombination [14-16]. The genetic polymorphism at the code 247 of XRCC4 gene (rs3734091) has been reported to be associated with DNA repair capacity and various cancers [17], indicating that it might play an important role in various cancers [15,17-20]. However, the association between it and DIA has not yet been elucidated. Therefore, we specifically conducted a hospital-based case-control study to examine whether this polymorphism modified the risk and the prognosis of DIA among Guangxi population.

Results

Demographic and Clinic Characteristics of the Subjects

Our final analysis included 242 DIA cases and 358 controls. The demographic characteristics of all cases and controls are shown in Table 1. The mean age, gender ratio, and race distribution are of the same levels in both control and DIA groups (p > 0.05). According to the WHO grading standard of DIA, cases with IV-grade tumors accounted for 58.7% (142/242), whereas the frequencies of II-grade, and III-grade cases were 19.4% (47/242) and 21.9% (53/242), respectively.
Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of diffusely infiltrating astrocytoma (DIA) cases and controls.

CharacteristicsControls (n = 358)Cases (n = 242)χ2p


n%n%
Age (years)0.3171.000
 ≤35195.3135.4
 36–40236.4166.6
 41–45339.2229.1
 46–507621.25321.9
 51–5510228.56828.1
 56–604512.63012.4
 61–65349.5249.9
 ≥66267.3156.2
Sex0.3180.573
 Male23064.215062.0
 Female12835.89238.0
Race0.0260.872
 Han18451.412652.1
 Minority17448.611647.9

The mean ± S.D. ages were 50.19 ± 9.36 and 50.25 ± 8.88 for cases and controls, respectively.

XRCC4 Codon 247 Polymorphism Increased DIA Risk

The genotypic distribution of XRCC4 codon 247 for both tumor patients and controls is summarized in Table 2. The frequencies of the codon 247 Ser allele among cases and controls were 22.3% and 11.3%, respectively. Genotype frequent distribution in controls fit the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium well. The heterozygous genotype with XRCC4 codon 247 Ala and Ser allele (XRCC4-AS) and the variant homozygous genotype with XRCC4 codon 247 Ser allele (XRCC4-SS) were more frequent among cases than the controls (p < 0.01), resulting in an Ser allele frequency of 22.3% in cases and 11.3% in controls. Logistic regression analysis showed that the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for DIA for those individuals carrying XRCC4-AS compared with those exhibiting the homozygote for Ala alleles (XRCC4-AA) was 1.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13–2.94), and the corresponding OR for those featuring XRCC4-SS was 2.89 (95%CI, 1.62–15.15). These results showed that DIA risk was associated with the number of codon 247 Ser alleles.
Table 2.

XRCC4 codon 247 polymorphism and DIA risk.

XRCC4ControlsCasesOR (95%CI)p


n%n%
GenotypeAA b29883.216869.41
AS b3910.94016.51.82(1.13–2.94) a1.46 × 10−3
SS b215.93414.02.89(1.62–5.15) a3.22 × 10−4
AlleleAla c63588.737677.71
Ser d8111.310822.32.25(1.64–3.09)4.43 × 10−7

Odds ratio (OR) conditional on matched set;

AA, AS, and SS represent the homozygotes of XRCC4 codon 247 Ala alleles, the heterozygotes of XRCC4 codon 247 Ala and Ser allele, and the homozygotes of XRCC4 codon 247 Ser alleles, respectively;

Ala represents both heterozygous Ala and homozygous Ala;

Ser represents both heterozygous Ser and homozygous Ser.

To assess possible interactive effects of matching factors and XRCC4 codon 247 polymorphism on DIA risk, we performed a series of bivariate stratified analyses by matching factors (including age, race, and sex), and did not find that these factors modulated the effect of this polymorphism on DIA risk (Pinteraction > 0.05; Table 3). This implied that these matching factors should be effectually manipulated and should not modify the association between this polymorphism and DIA risk.
Table 3.

XRCC4 codon 247 polymorphism and DIA risk stratified by race (Han and Minority), gender (female and male), and age (≤50 years and >50 years).

VariableGenotypeControlCaseOR (95%CI) ap


n%n%
Race bXRCC4
 HanAA15282.68769.01
AS2111.42116.71.73(0.89–3.34)0.11
SS115.81814.23.07(1.35–7.00)7.68 × 10−3
AS/SS3217.23930.92.16(1.25–3.71)5.65 × 10−3
 ZhuangAA14683.98169.61
AS1810.21916.41.87(0.93–3.76)0.08
SS116.11614.12.61(1.16–5.92)0.02
AS/SS2816.33530.52.15(1.22–3.78)7.89 × 10−3
Gender cXRCC4
 MaleAA19383.910469.31
AS2410.42718.02.10(1.15–3.84)1.56 × 10−2
SS135.81912.72.81(1.33–5.96)6.95 × 10−3
AS/SS3716.24630.72.35(1.43–3.86)7.82 × 10−4
 FemaleAA10582.06469.31
AS1511.51314.11.40(0.62–3.15)0.42
SS86.21516.52.86(1.14–7.19)2.50 × 10−2
AS/SS2317.82830.61.92(1.01–3.64)4.60 × 10−2
Age dXRCC4
 ≤50AA12884.87572.11
AS1711.31817.31.83(0.89–3.78)0.10
SS63.81110.63.19(1.13–9.02)2.85 × 10−2
AS/SS15199.92927.92.19(1.18–4.06)1.34 × 10−2
 >50AA17082.19367.21
AS2210.52215.91.86(0.98–3.56)0.06
SS157.32316.82.76(1.37–5.56)4.56 × 10−3
AS/SS3717.94532.72.23(1.35–3.70)1.88 × 10−3

OR conditional on matched set;

Likelihood ratio test for interaction of the stratified variable (Han and Minority) and XRCC4 codon 247 genotype was calculated as test for the heterogeneity of ORs across strata (interact term OR = 0.99, Pinteraction = 0.983);

Likelihood ratio test for interaction of the stratified variable (Male and Female) and XRCC4 codon 247 genotype was calculated as test for the heterogeneity of ORs across strata (interact term OR = 1.17, Pinteraction = 0.709);

Likelihood ratio test for interaction of the stratified variable (Age: ≤50 years and >50 years) and XRCC4 codon 247 genotype was calculated as test for the heterogeneity of ORs across strata (interact term OR = 1.04, Pinteraction = 0.933).

XRCC4 Codon 247 Polymorphism Correlated with the Tumor Grade of DIA

To investigate whether XRCC4 codon 247 polymorphism correlated with the clinic pathological features of DIA, an association analysis of the risk genotypes [i.e., genotypes of the XRCC4 codon 247 Ser alleles (XRCC4-AS/SS)] or the non-risk genotype (XRCC4-AA) and the clinical pathological characteristics of DIA was first performed separately. Significant differences in the distributions of the genotypes were observed with respect to different tumor grades but not with respect to age, gender, and minority status (data not shown). Spearman r test next exhibited that XRCC4 codon 247 polymorphism was positively related to a higher grade of DIA (r = 0.261, p < 0.01; Table 4). Taken together, this polymorphism might correlate with the progression of DIA from low grade to high grade.
Table 4.

XRCC4 codon 247 polymorphism and DIA grade.

IIIIIIV



XRCC4n%n%n%
AA4289.44177.48559.7
AS48.5713.22920.4
SS12.159.42819.9
AS/SS510.61222.65740.3

Spearman r test: r = 0.261 and p = 4.07 × 10−5.

XRCC4 Codon 247 Polymorphism Modified DIA Prognosis

Because a previous study had shown that the variants in the DNA repair genes might modify DIA prognosis [21], we analyzed the survival information of all DIA cases. During the follow-up period of 242 DIA patients, 231 died 77.2% of which showed a one-year overall survival rate (OSR), 25.8% a three-year OSR, and 0.6% a five-year OSR. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed that DIA patients carrying XRCC4-AS/SS had a shorter overall survival time [the median survival time (MST) was 14 and 8 months for patients with XRCC4-AS and XRCC4-SS, respectively] compared to those with XRCC4-AA (MST, 26 months) (Figure 1). Multivariate cox regression analysis (with stepwise forward selection based on likelihood ratio test) was next performed to determine whether XRCC4 codon 247 polymorphism was an independent predictor of overall survival for patients with DIA. The results exhibited that this polymorphism increased the risk of dying of DIA, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.26 for XRCC4-AS and 5.36 for XRCC4-SS (p < 0.01; Table 5), respectively.
Figure 1.

XRCC4 codon 247 polymorphism was correlated with the overall survival (OS) of diffusely infiltrating astrocytoma (DIA). Cumulative hazard function was plotted by the Kaplan-Meier methodology and the P value was calculated with two-sided log-rank tests. MST, the median survival time.

Table 5.

XRCC4 codon 247 polymorphism and overall death risk of DIA.

VariableHR(95%CI)p
XRCC4
AA1
AS2.26(1.57–3.24)9.75 × 10−6
SS5.36(3.51–8.17)6.42 × 10−15
Grade
II1
III4.27(2.53–7.20)5.32 × 10−8
IV9.27(5.54–15.51)2.31 × 10−17

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, no studies have investigated the role of DNA-repair gene XRCC4 for patients suffering from DIA, especially in the epidemic areas. In this study, we analyzed the association between XRCC4 codon 247 Ala > Ser polymorphism and the risk of DIA among the Guangxi population in an area with a relatively high incidence of DIA. The results showed that XRCC4 codon 247 Ser alleles had a substantial association with the increasing risk of DIA (adjusted OR 1.82 for XRCC4-AS; 2.89 for XRCC4-SS). These results suggest that XRCC4 codon 247 polymorphism may have functional significance in DIA. XRCC4, located on chromosome 5q14.2, is an important DNA repair gene involved in the NHEJ pathway [15,22]. The encoded protein of XRCC4 interacts directly with Ku70/Ku80 and plays a central role in the precise end-joining of blunt DSBs [10,22]. Mutations in the coding region of this gene might result in more deficient NHEJ capacity [23-25] and increase cancer risk [17-20]. To date, more than forty genetic polymorphisms based on mutations have been found in XRCC4, some of which are related to malignant tumors such as hepatocellular carcinoma [18,19], gastric cancer [26,27], oral cancer [20], bladder cancer [28], and esophageal cancer [29]. In this study, we only analyzed XRCC4 codon 247 polymorphism, mainly because this polymorphism localizes at conserved sequence of XRCC4 and results in the missense mutation Ala to Ser. This suggests that the missense mutation at codon 247 of XRCC4 codon 247 might decrease DNA repair capacity and increase tumor risk. Our present study exhibited that this polymorphism elevated DIA risk in the Guangxi population. Similar to our results, Tseng et al. [20] investigated the effects of XRCC4 codon 247 polymorphism on oral cancer in Taiwan (another Chinese population) and found that persons carrying XRCC4-AS had a higher cancer risk than those with XRCC4-AA (adjusted OR = 2.04, p = 0.023). Recently, a large hospital-based case-control epidemiologic study has also shown that this polymorphism increases the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma [18]. Furthermore, some interactive evidence of mutative alleles and genetic toxin is observed in this epidemiological study. Taken together, those results suggest that XRCC4 codon 247 polymorphism may alter the normal protein function and, consequently, may be associated with a reduction in DNA repair capacity [17]. Thus, the DNA damage from environmental risk factors cannot be repaired effectively and duly, consequently it may induce genetic mutation [6], and brain cell canceration. Thus, this polymorphism may play a role in the carcinogenetic pathway of Guangxiese DIA. Because previous studies had shown that XRCC4 codon 247 polymorphism may modify tumor outcome [18,21], we analyzed the relationship between this polymorphism and DIA prognosis. We found that XRCC4 codon 247 polymorphism shortened MST of DIA (14 months for XRCC4-AS and 8 months for XRCC4-SS) and increased death risk of DIA (HRs were 2.26 and 5.36 for XRCC4-AS and -SS, respectively), possibly because it correlates with the fact that this polymorphism modifies tumor grade and differentiation, and, consequently, might promote tumor metastasis. Supporting our results, recent studies have exhibited that XRCC4 codon 247 polymorphism is associated with a decreased XRCC4 expression [18], and that down-regulated expression of XRCC4 modifies DIA prognosis [21]. In the present study, to control the effects of confounders such as age, gender, and race, we used an individually matched design. In the stratified analysis, no interactive effects were found, suggesting that these factors do not modify the correlation between XRCC4 codon 247 polymorphism and DIA. However, there were several limitations to our study. Potential selection bias might have occurred because the selection of control subjects in our study was hospital-based. Despite the analysis of the XRCC4 codon 247 polymorphism, we did not analyze other polymorphisms of this gene possibly able to modify the risk of DIA. Our findings were based on relatively small numbers and limited by small number subjects in part of the genotype strata. Therefore, more genes deserve further elucidation based on a large sample and the combination of genes.

Experimental Section

Study Population

Between January 2004 and December 2009, incident DIA cases were recruited at the affiliated hospitals of two main medical universities in Guangxi, Guangxi Medical University and Youjiang Medical College for Nationalities. All cases were histopathologically confirmed and previously treated with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. There were no age, sex, race, or tumor stage restrictions. Each new patient was screened with a brief eligibility questionnaire that assessed prior tumor therapy and willingness to participate in this study by the instituted staff interviewers. If the patient was willing to participate, the interviewer accompanied the study participant to a private room to conduct the interview. Healthy control subjects without a history of cancer were randomly selected from a pool of healthy volunteers. Because of the routine scheduled physical exams, volunteers visited the general health check-up centers of the same hospitals. The controls were individually matched (1:1 or 2:1) to cases based on ethnicity (Han, Minority), sex, and age (±5 years). Every potential control was first surveyed by using a short questionnaire to elicit willingness to participate in the study and to provide preliminary demographic data for matching. A total of 242 cases and 358 controls, representing 95% of eligible cases and 98% of eligible controls, were enrolled and interviewed. After giving written consent, demographic information and clinical pathological data were collected in the hospitals using a standard interviewer administered questionnaire and/or medical records. At the same time, 4 mL of peripheral blood was obtained for DNA extraction. This study was approved by the ethics committees of the hospitals involved in this study. All activities involving human subjects were carried out under full compliance with government policies and the Helsinki Declaration.

DNA Extraction

DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples from all tumor patients and control subjects in a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube for deparaffinization and proteinase K digestion, as described by standard procedures (Protocol #BS474, Bio Basic, Inc., Markham, ON, Canada). DNA was stored at 4 °C until additional analysis.

Genotyping

Genotypes were analyzed by using a previously published TaqMan-PCR technique [18,19]. Briefly, PCR analysis was accomplished on iCycle iQ™ real-time PCR detection system (iQ5, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The following primers and primers were used: 5′-TGAGGAAAGTGAAAACCAA ACTGATCT-3′, 5′-GCCCAAATAAGATATTCAACAGAGGAGAT-3′, 5′-FAM-CCTGAAGACAAC CC-MGB-3′, and 5′-HEX-CCTGAAGCCAACCC-MGB-3′ [18]. All primers and probes were synthesized by Shanghai GeneCore BioTechnologies Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Each PCR was carried out in total volume of 5 μL consisting of 1× TaqMAN Universal Master Mix II (cat#4440041, Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 0.2 μM of each probe, 0.2 μM of each primer, and about 15 ng of genomic DNA. Cycling conditions were 95 °C for 30 s, and 50 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min. For quality control, laboratory personnel were blinded to case and control status. Controls were included in each run, and repeated genotyping and sequencing of a random 20% subset yielded 100% identical genotypes.

DIA Patients Follow-up

All DIA patients were followed for at least 3 years for medians and ranges. The last follow-up day was 30 September 2013, and the survival status was confirmed by patients or family contacts. In this study, the duration of overall survival was defined as the time from surgical resection to death or to the date on which the patient was last known to be alive.

Statistical Analysis

All analyses were performed with the statistical package for social science (SPSS) version 18 (SPSS Institute, Chicago, IL, USA). The Pearson’s χ2 test was used to test the differences between the cases and the control subjects in the distribution of gender, age, ethnicity, and XRCC4 genotypes. The Spearman r test was used to analyze the correlation between XRCC4 genotypes and tumor grade of DIA. As the present study was based on an individually matched design, we did conditional logistic regression to elucidate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for risk of DIA. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis with the log-rank test was used to evaluate the relationship between XRCC4 codon 247 polymorphism and DIA prognosis. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95%CIs for XRCC4 genotypes were calculated from a multivariate Cox regression model (with step-wise forward selection based on the likelihood ratio test). In this study, a p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Conclusions

In summary, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first report investigating an association between XRCC4 codon 247 polymorphism and the risk and prognosis of DIA in Guangxi patients. We have found evidence suggesting that the genotypes of XRCC4 with codon 247 Ser alleles may be correlated with increased risk and poor prognosis for DIA, and that the decreasing NHEJ capacity may play an important role in the tumorigenesis of this type of tumor.
  29 in total

1.  [The study of esophageal cancer risk associated with polymorphisms of DNA damage repair genes XRCC4 and RAD51].

Authors:  Xue-Jiao Fan; Peng-Liang Ren; Zhong-Jiao Lu; Shu Zhao; Xiao-Long Yang; Jia Liu
Journal:  Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2013-07

2.  DNA-repair gene variants are associated with glioblastoma survival.

Authors:  Carl Wibom; Sara Sjöström; Roger Henriksson; Thomas Brännström; Helle Broholm; Patrik Rydén; Christoffer Johansen; Helle Collatz-Laier; Sara Hepworth; Patricia A McKinney; Lara Bethke; Richard S Houlston; Ulrika Andersson; Beatrice S Melin
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 4.089

Review 3.  Detection and repair of ionizing radiation-induced DNA double strand breaks: new developments in nonhomologous end joining.

Authors:  Chen Wang; Susan P Lees-Miller
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Variation in DNA repair gene XRCC3 affects susceptibility to astrocytomas and glioblastomas.

Authors:  A C Custódio; L O Almeida; G R Pinto; M J Santos; J R W Almeida; C A Clara; J A Rey; C Casartelli
Journal:  Genet Mol Res       Date:  2012-02-10

5.  Interplay of p53 and DNA-repair protein XRCC4 in tumorigenesis, genomic stability and development.

Authors:  Y Gao; D O Ferguson; W Xie; J P Manis; J Sekiguchi; K M Frank; J Chaudhuri; J Horner; R A DePinho; F W Alt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-04-20       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  A critical role for DNA end-joining proteins in both lymphogenesis and neurogenesis.

Authors:  Y Gao; Y Sun; K M Frank; P Dikkes; Y Fujiwara; K J Seidl; J M Sekiguchi; G A Rathbun; W Swat; J Wang; R T Bronson; B A Malynn; M Bryans; C Zhu; J Chaudhuri; L Davidson; R Ferrini; T Stamato; S H Orkin; M E Greenberg; F W Alt
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-12-23       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 7.  Genetic alterations and signaling pathways in the evolution of gliomas.

Authors:  Hiroko Ohgaki; Paul Kleihues
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 6.716

8.  Polymorphisms in the coding region of X-ray repair complementing group 4 and aflatoxin B1-related hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Xi-Dai Long; Jin-Guang Yao; Zhi Zeng; Yun Ma; Xiao-Ying Huang; Zhong-Hua Wei; Min Liu; Jian-Jun Zhang; Feng Xue; Bo Zhai; Qiang Xia
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 17.425

9.  Evaluation of genetic variation in the double-strand break repair pathway and bladder cancer risk.

Authors:  Jonine D Figueroa; Núria Malats; Nathaniel Rothman; Francisco X Real; Debra Silverman; Manolis Kogevinas; Stephen Chanock; Meredith Yeager; Robert Welch; Mustafa Dosemeci; Adonina Tardón; Consol Serra; Alfredo Carrato; Reina García-Closas; Gemma Castaño-Vinyals; Montserrat García-Closas
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 10.  Deregulated chromatin remodeling in the pathobiology of brain tumors.

Authors:  Anastasia Spyropoulou; Christina Piperi; Christos Adamopoulos; Athanasios G Papavassiliou
Journal:  Neuromolecular Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.843

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Polymorphisms in DNA Repair Gene and Susceptibility to Glioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Based on 33 Studies with 15 SNPs in 9 Genes.

Authors:  Kun Liu; Yugang Jiang
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 5.046

Review 2.  Hepatocellular carcinoma and the risk of occupational exposure.

Authors:  Venerando Rapisarda; Carla Loreto; Michele Malaguarnera; Annalisa Ardiri; Maria Proiti; Giuseppe Rigano; Evelise Frazzetto; Maria Irene Ruggeri; Giulia Malaguarnera; Nicoletta Bertino; Mariano Malaguarnera; Vito Emanuele Catania; Isidoro Di Carlo; Adriana Toro; Emanuele Bertino; Dario Mangano; Gaetano Bertino
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-05-08

3.  Chronic Piromelatine Treatment Alleviates Anxiety, Depressive Responses and Abnormal Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis Activity in Prenatally Stressed Male and Female Rats.

Authors:  Natasha Ivanova; Zlatina Nenchovska; Milena Atanasova; Moshe Laudon; Rumyana Mitreva; Jana Tchekalarova
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.231

4.  Susceptibility to Breast Cancer and Intron 3 Ins/Del Genetic Polymorphism of DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Gene XRCC4.

Authors:  Mostafa Saadat; Shekoofeh Saadat
Journal:  J Med Biochem       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  Non‑infective occupational risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma: A review (Review).

Authors:  Caterina Ledda; Carla Loreto; Christian Zammit; Andrea Marconi; Lucrezia Fago; Serena Matera; Valentina Costanzo; Giovanni Fuccio Sanzà; Stefano Palmucci; Margherita Ferrante; Chiara Costa; Concettina Fenga; Antonio Biondi; Cristoforo Pomara; Venerando Rapisarda
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 2.952

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.