Literature DB >> 24378337

A comparison of alignment using patient specific guides, computer navigation and conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty.

Samuel J MacDessi1, Bob Jang2, Ian A Harris3, Emma Wheatley4, Carl Bryant4, Darren B Chen2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient specific guides (PSG) have been introduced as a tool in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in an attempt to improve limb alignment and reduce operative time compared to other established surgical techniques. The purpose of this study was to compare the post-operative radiographic alignment and operative time in patients who underwent TKA surgery with PSG, conventional instrumentation or computer-assisted navigation surgery using fully cemented components.
METHODS: A cohort of 260 patients who underwent TKA surgery using PSG (PSG group, n=115) was compared to patients who underwent TKA using either conventional instrumentation (CON group, n=92) or computer-assisted navigation (CAS group, n=53). Post-operative CT imaging using the Perth CT protocol was used to compare alignment between the three groups.
RESULTS: In the PSG and CAS groups, the post-operative hip-knee angle (HKA) was within 3° of neutral alignment in 91.3% and 90.7% of patients, respectively. This compared to 80.4% of patients in the CON group (p=0.02). There were no significant differences with respect to alignment when comparing individual component positioning between the PSG and CAS groups apart from tibial slope (Table 3). Total operative time was found to be significantly reduced in the PSG group (80.2 min) compared to both the CON group (86 min, p=0.002) and the CAS group (110.2 min, p<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of PSG resulted in similar alignment accuracy to CAS and superior alignment to CON with significantly shorter operative times.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alignment; Conventional; Patient specific guides

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24378337     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2013.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  15 in total

1.  Small improvements in mechanical axis alignment achieved with MRI versus CT-based patient-specific instruments in TKA: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Tilman Pfitzner; Matthew P Abdel; Philipp von Roth; Carsten Perka; Hagen Hommel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Navigation in TKA surgery - Evolutionary technique or blind alley?

Authors:  Heiko Graichen
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-03-06

Review 3.  Evaluation of the accuracy of patient-specific cutting blocks for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Etienne Cavaignac; Regis Pailhé; Gregoire Laumond; Jérôme Murgier; Nicolas Reina; Jean Michel Laffosse; Emilie Bérard; Philippe Chiron
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Conventional versus computer-navigated TKA: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Alessandro Todesca; Luca Garro; Massimo Penna; Jacques Bejui-Hugues
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  [Research progress on comparison of the application effects between personal specific instrumentation and computer-assisted navigation surgery in total knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  Ziyang Dong; Yang Li; Hua Tian
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-11-15

Review 6.  Current concepts and future perspectives in computer-assisted navigated total knee replacement.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Naoki Nakano; John E Lawrence; Vikas Khanduja
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Significant differences between manufacturer and surgeon in the accuracy of final component size prediction with CT-based patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Davide Cucchi; Alessandra Menon; Riccardo Compagnoni; Paolo Ferrua; Chiara Fossati; Pietro Randelli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Accuracy of CT-based patient-specific guides for total knee arthroplasty in patients with post-traumatic osteoarthritis.

Authors:  M G M Schotanus; E H van Haaren; R P M Hendrickx; E J P Jansen; N P Kort
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-08-12

9.  Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: simpler, faster and more accurate than standard instrumentation-a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  João Vide; Tânia Pinto Freitas; Acácio Ramos; Henrique Cruz; João Paulo Sousa
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Technical and surgical causes of outliers after computer navigated total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Siddharth M Shah; Nadia C Sciberras; David J Allen; Frederic Picard
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-11-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.