Literature DB >> 24377018

Comparison of individual and composite field analysis using array detector for Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy dose verification.

Sathiyan Saminathan1, Varatharaj Chandraraj1, C H Sridhar2, Ravikumar Manickam1.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare the measured and calculated individual and composite field planar dose distribution of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy plans.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The measurements were performed in Clinac DHX linear accelerator with 6 MV photons using Matrixx device and a solid water phantom. The 20 brain tumor patients were selected for this study. The IMRT plan was carried out for all the patients using Eclipse treatment planning system. The verification plan was produced for every original plan using CT scan of Matrixx embedded in the phantom. Every verification field was measured by the Matrixx. The TPS calculated and measured dose distributions were compared for individual and composite fields. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The percentage of gamma pixel match for the dose distribution patterns were evaluated using gamma histogram. The gamma pixel match was 95-98% for 41 fields (39%) and 98% for 59 fields (61%) with individual fields. The percentage of gamma pixel match was 95-98% for 5 patients and 98% for other 12 patients with composite fields. Three patients showed a gamma pixel match of less than 95%. The comparison of percentage gamma pixel match for individual and composite fields showed more than 2.5% variation for 6 patients, more than 1% variation for 4 patients, while the remaining 10 patients showed less than 1% variation.
CONCLUSION: The individual and composite field measurements showed good agreement with TPS calculated dose distribution for the studied patients. The measurement and data analysis for individual fields is a time consuming process, the composite field analysis may be sufficient enough for smaller field dose distribution analysis with array detectors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gamma pixel; IMRT; I’matriXX; TPS

Year:  2012        PMID: 24377018      PMCID: PMC3863249          DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2012.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother        ISSN: 1507-1367


  10 in total

1.  Comprehensive quality assurance for the delivery of intensity modulated radiotherapy with a multileaf collimator used in the dynamic mode.

Authors:  T LoSasso; C S Chui; C C Ling
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  MLC quality assurance techniques for IMRT applications.

Authors:  J E Bayouth; D Wendt; S M Morrill
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Interpretation and evaluation of the gamma index and the gamma index angle for the verification of IMRT hybrid plans.

Authors:  Markus Stock; Bernhard Kroupa; Dietmar Georg
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-02-07       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Dosimetric quality assurance for intensity-modulated radiotherapy feasibility study for a filmless approach.

Authors:  Tilo Wiezorek; Nico Banz; Michael Schwedas; Marcel Scheithauer; Henning Salz; Dietmar Georg; Thomas G Wendt
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  A study on dosimetric properties of electronic portal imaging device and its use as a quality assurance tool in Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy.

Authors:  Prabakar Sukumar; Sriram Padmanaban; Prakash Jeevanandam; S A Syam Kumar; Vivekanandan Nagarajan
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2011-08-26

6.  IMRT commissioning: multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119.

Authors:  Gary A Ezzell; Jay W Burmeister; Nesrin Dogan; Thomas J LoSasso; James G Mechalakos; Dimitris Mihailidis; Andrea Molineu; Jatinder R Palta; Chester R Ramsey; Bill J Salter; Jie Shi; Ping Xia; Ning J Yue; Ying Xiao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Testing of dynamic multileaf collimation.

Authors:  C S Chui; S Spirou; T LoSasso
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Shaping of arbitrary dose distributions by dynamic multileaf collimation.

Authors:  P Källman; B Lind; A Eklöf; A Brahme
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  EPID in vivo dosimetry in RapidArc technique.

Authors:  Krzysztof Slosarek; Marta Szlag; Barbara Bekman; Aleksandra Grzadziel
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2010-02-20

10.  Patient specific quality assurance for the delivery of intensity modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Nzhde Agazaryan; Timothy D Solberg; John J DeMarco
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.102

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  A study on the correlation between plan complexity and gamma index analysis in patient specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Dhanabalan Rajasekaran; Prakash Jeevanandam; Prabakar Sukumar; Arulpandiyan Ranganathan; Samdevakumar Johnjothi; Vivekanandan Nagarajan
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2014-09-06

Review 2.  Whole brain radiotherapy: Consequences for personalized medicine.

Authors:  Tomáš Kazda; Petr Pospíšil; Hana Doleželová; Radim Jančálek; Pavel Slampa
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2013-04-19

3.  Optimization of Clarkson's Method for Calculating Absorbed Dose under Compensator Filters used in Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Pourkaveh M; Haghparast A; Eivazi M T; Ghazikhanlu Sani K
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2020-10-01

4.  Preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: a comparative study of quality control adherence at two cancer hospitals in Spain and Poland.

Authors:  Magdalena Fundowicz; Miguel Macia; Susanna Marin; Marta Bogusz-Czerniewicz; Ewelina Konstanty; Ignaci Modolel; Julian Malicki; Ferran Guedea
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 2.991

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.