Letizia Deantonio1, Laura Masini1, Gianfranco Loi2, Giuseppina Gambaro1, Cesare Bolchini1, Marco Krengli3. 1. Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital "Maggiore della Carità", Novara, Italy. 2. Department of Medical Physics, University Hospital "Maggiore della Carità", Novara, Italy. 3. Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital "Maggiore della Carità", Novara, Italy ; Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of "Piemonte Orientale", Novara, Italy.
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the clinical application of a technique for patient set-up verification in breast cancer radiotherapy based on a 3D surface image registration system. BACKGROUND: Accurate and reproducible patient set-up is a prerequisite to correctly deliver fractionated radiotherapy. Various approaches are available to verify and correct patient setup for 3D image acquisition in a radiation treatment room. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study analyzed the setup reproducibility of 15 patients affected by breast cancer and candidates for conformal radiotherapy by using the AlignRT system (VisionRT, London, UK). At the initial setup, electronic portal imaging device (EPID) images were compared with Digitally Reconstructed Radiographs (DRRs) and a reference three-dimensional (3D) surface image was obtained by AlignRT. Surface images were acquired prior to every subsequent setup procedure. The systematic and random errors along longitudinal and vertical directions were measured and compared for the two systems. RESULTS: The procedure for surface registration, image acquisition and comparison with the reference image took less than 1 min on average. The T test for systematic error showed no significant difference between the 2 verification systems along the longitudinal (p = 0.69) and vertical (p = 0.67) axes. The T-test for random error showed a significant difference between the 2 systems along the vertical axis (p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: AlignRT is fast, simple, non-invasive and seems to be reliable in detecting patient setup errors. Our results suggest that it could be used to assess the setup reproducibility for breast cancer patients.
AIM: To investigate the clinical application of a technique for patient set-up verification in breast cancer radiotherapy based on a 3D surface image registration system. BACKGROUND: Accurate and reproducible patient set-up is a prerequisite to correctly deliver fractionated radiotherapy. Various approaches are available to verify and correct patient setup for 3D image acquisition in a radiation treatment room. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study analyzed the setup reproducibility of 15 patients affected by breast cancer and candidates for conformal radiotherapy by using the AlignRT system (VisionRT, London, UK). At the initial setup, electronic portal imaging device (EPID) images were compared with Digitally Reconstructed Radiographs (DRRs) and a reference three-dimensional (3D) surface image was obtained by AlignRT. Surface images were acquired prior to every subsequent setup procedure. The systematic and random errors along longitudinal and vertical directions were measured and compared for the two systems. RESULTS: The procedure for surface registration, image acquisition and comparison with the reference image took less than 1 min on average. The T test for systematic error showed no significant difference between the 2 verification systems along the longitudinal (p = 0.69) and vertical (p = 0.67) axes. The T-test for random error showed a significant difference between the 2 systems along the vertical axis (p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: AlignRT is fast, simple, non-invasive and seems to be reliable in detecting patient setup errors. Our results suggest that it could be used to assess the setup reproducibility for breast cancerpatients.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast cancer; Patient setup; Radiotherapy; Surface imaging
Authors: K M Langen; J Pouliot; C Anezinos; M Aubin; A R Gottschalk; I-C Hsu; D Lowther; Y-M Liu; K Shinohara; L J Verhey; V Weinberg; M Roach Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2003-11-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Christoph Bert; Katherine G Metheany; Karen P Doppke; Alphonse G Taghian; Simon N Powell; George T Y Chen Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2006-03-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Anke van Mourik; Simon van Kranen; Suzanne den Hollander; Jan-Jakob Sonke; Marcel van Herk; Corine van Vliet-Vroegindeweij Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-10-08 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Philipp J Schöffel; Wolfgang Harms; Gabriele Sroka-Perez; Wolfgang Schlegel; Christian P Karger Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2007-06-06 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: David B Wiant; Stacy Wentworth; Jacqueline M Maurer; Caroline L Vanderstraeten; Jonathon A Terrell; Benjamin J Sintay Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2014-11-08 Impact factor: 2.102
Authors: G Carl; D Reitz; S Schönecker; M Pazos; P Freislederer; M Reiner; F Alongi; M Niyazi; U Ganswindt; C Belka; S Corradini Journal: Technol Cancer Res Treat Date: 2018-01-01