Literature DB >> 14529767

Evaluation of ultrasound-based prostate localization for image-guided radiotherapy.

K M Langen1, J Pouliot, C Anezinos, M Aubin, A R Gottschalk, I-C Hsu, D Lowther, Y-M Liu, K Shinohara, L J Verhey, V Weinberg, M Roach.   

Abstract

To evaluate the use of the ultrasound-based BAT system for daily prostate alignment. Prostate alignments using the BAT system were compared with alignments using radiographic images of implanted radiopaque markers. The latter alignments were used as a reference. The difference between the BAT and marker alignments represents the displacements that would remain if the alignments were done using ultrasonography. The inter-user variability of the contour alignment process was assessed. On the basis of the marker alignments, the initial displacement of the prostate in the AP, superoinferior, and lateral direction was -0.9 +/- 3.9, 0.1 +/- 3.9, and 0.2 +/- 3.4 mm respectively. The directed differences between the BAT and marker alignments in the respective directions were 0.2 +/- 3.7, 2.7 +/- 3.9, and 1.6 +/- 3.1 mm. The occurrence of displacements >/=5 mm was reduced by a factor of two in the AP direction after the BAT system was used. Among eight users, the average range of couch shifts due to contour alignment variability was 7, 7, and 5 mm in the antero-posterior (AP), superoinferior, and lateral direction, respectively. In our study, the BAT alignments were systematically different from the marker alignments in the superoinferior, and lateral directions. The remaining random variability of the prostate position after the ultrasound-based alignment was similar to the initial variability. However, the occurrence of displacements >/=5 mm was reduced in the AP direction. The inter-user variation of the contour alignment process was significant.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14529767     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00633-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  34 in total

1.  Consideration of the likely benefit from implementation of prostate image-guided radiotherapy using current margin sizes: a radiobiological analysis.

Authors:  G S J Tudor; Y L Rimmer; T B Nguyen; M A Cowen; S J Thomas
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  A review of image-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  George T Y Chen; Gregory C Sharp; Shinichiro Mori
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2008-12-16

3.  In vivo reproducibility of robotic probe placement for a novel ultrasound-guided radiation therapy system.

Authors:  Muyinatu A Lediju Bell; H Tutkun Sen; Iulian Iordachita; Peter Kazanzides; John Wong
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2014-07-23

4.  An analysis of an implantable dosimeter system for external beam therapy.

Authors:  Robert D Black; Charles W Scarantino; Gregory G Mann; Mitchell S Anscher; Robert D Ornitz; Benjamin E Nelms
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 5.  Percutaneous radiotherapy for low-risk prostate cancer: options for 2007.

Authors:  Dirk Bottke; Thomas Wiegel
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Intrafractional motion of the prostate during hypofractionated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yaoqin Xie; David Djajaputra; Christopher R King; Sabbir Hossain; Lijun Ma; Lei Xing
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  The observed variance between predicted and measured radiation dose in breast and prostate patients utilizing an in vivo dosimeter.

Authors:  Charles W Scarantino; Bradley R Prestidge; Mitchel S Anscher; Carolyn R Ferree; William T Kearns; Robert D Black; Natasha G Bolick; Gloria P Beyer
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  A survey of image-guided radiation therapy use in the United States.

Authors:  Daniel R Simpson; Joshua D Lawson; Sameer K Nath; Brent S Rose; Arno J Mundt; Loren K Mell
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Reduced rectal toxicity with ultrasound-based image guided radiotherapy using BAT (B-mode acquisition and targeting system) for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Markus Bohrer; Peter Schröder; Grit Welzel; Hansjörg Wertz; Frank Lohr; Frederik Wenz; Sabine Kathrin Mai
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 10.  Particle therapy of moving targets-the strategies for tumour motion monitoring and moving targets irradiation.

Authors:  Tomasz Kubiak
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.