Literature DB >> 24370165

Feasibility of using the marginal blood vessels as reference landmarks for CT colonography.

Zhuoshi Wei1, Jianhua Yao, Shijun Wang, Jiamin Liu, Andrew J Dwyer, Perry J Pickhardt, Wieslaw L Nowinski, Ronald M Summers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to show the spatial relationship of the colonic marginal blood vessels and the teniae coli on CT colonography (CTC) and the use of the marginal blood vessels for supine-prone registration of polyps and for determination of proper connectivity of collapsed colonic segments.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We manually labeled the marginal blood vessels on 15 CTC examinations. Colon segmentation, centerline extraction, teniae detection, and teniae identification were automatically performed. For assessment of their spatial relationships, the distances from the marginal blood vessels to the three teniae coli and to the colon were measured. Student t tests (paired, two-tailed) were performed to evaluate the differences among these distances. To evaluate the reliability of the marginal vessels as reference points for polyp correlation, we analyzed 20 polyps from 20 additional patients who underwent supine and prone CTC. The average difference of the circumferential polyp position on the supine and prone scans was computed. Student t tests (paired, two-tailed) were performed to evaluate the supine-prone differences of the distance. We performed a study on 10 CTC studies from 10 patients with collapsed colonic segments by manually tracing the marginal blood vessels near the collapsed regions to resolve the ambiguity of the colon path.
RESULTS: The average distances (± SD) from the marginal blood vessels to the tenia mesocolica, tenia omentalis, and tenia libera were 20.1 ± 3.1 mm (95% CI, 18.5-21.6 mm), 39.5 ± 4.8 mm (37.1-42.0 mm), and 36.9 ± 4.2 mm (34.8-39.1 mm), respectively. Pairwise comparison showed that these distances to the tenia libera and tenia omentalis were significantly different from the distance to the tenia mesocolica (p < 0.001). The average distance from the marginal blood vessels to the colon wall was 15.3 ± 2.0 mm (14.2-16.3 mm). For polyp localization, the average difference of the circumferential polyp position on the supine and prone scans was 9.6 ± 9.4 mm (5.5-13.7 mm) (p = 0.15) and expressed as a percentage of the colon circumference was 3.1% ± 2.0% (2.3-4.0%) (p = 0.83). We were able to trace the marginal blood vessels for 10 collapsed colonic segments and determine the paths of the colon in these regions.
CONCLUSION: The marginal blood vessels run parallel to the colon in proximity to the tenia mesocolica and enable accurate supine-prone registration of polyps and localization of the colon path in areas of collapse. Thus, the marginal blood vessels may be used as reference landmarks complementary to the colon centerline and teniae coli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24370165      PMCID: PMC4308041          DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.10463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  33 in total

1.  Surgical anatomy of the arterial supply to the colon from the superior mesenteric artery based upon a study of 600 specimens.

Authors:  J SONNELAND; B J ANSON; L E BEATON
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1958-04

2.  A comparison of primary two- and three-dimensional methods to review CT colonography.

Authors:  Rogier E van Gelder; Jasper Florie; C Yung Nio; Sebastiaan Jensch; Steven W de Jager; Frans M Vos; Henk W Venema; Joep F Bartelsman; Johannes B Reitsma; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Johan S Laméris; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Screening CT colonography: how I do it.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  CT colonography: visualization methods, interpretation, and pitfalls.

Authors:  Abraham H Dachman; Philippe Lefere; Stefaan Gryspeerdt; Martina Morin
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy computer-aided polyp detection in a screening population.

Authors:  Ronald M Summers; Jianhua Yao; Perry J Pickhardt; Marek Franaszek; Ingmar Bitter; Daniel Brickman; Vamsi Krishna; J Richard Choi
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Some Points relating to the Surgical Anatomy of the Arterial Supply of the Large Intestine.

Authors:  H Drummond
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1914

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients.

Authors:  J G Fletcher; C D Johnson; T J Welch; R L MacCarty; D A Ahlquist; J E Reed; W S Harmsen; L A Wilson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Polyp size at CT colonography after electronic subtraction cleansing in an anthropomorphic colon phantom.

Authors:  Michael E Zalis; James J Perumpillichira; John Y Kim; Chiara Del Frate; Cordula Magee; Peter F Hahn
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Teniae coli-based circumferential localization system for CT colonography: feasibility study.

Authors:  Adam Huang; Dave A Roy; Ronald M Summers; Marek Franaszek; Nicholas Petrick; J Richard Choi; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Progress in Fully Automated Abdominal CT Interpretation.

Authors:  Ronald M Summers
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.959

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.