Literature DB >> 17502222

CT colonography: visualization methods, interpretation, and pitfalls.

Abraham H Dachman1, Philippe Lefere, Stefaan Gryspeerdt, Martina Morin.   

Abstract

Virtual colonoscopy interpretation is improving rapidly with the development of efficient software using two-dimensional, three-dimensional (3D) endoluminal, and 3D novel views such as those that seem to cut the colon open and lay it flat for interpretation. Comparison of these various views, comparisons of supine and prone positioning, and comparisons of lung and soft tissue windows aid in the recognition of various pitfalls of interpretation.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2007        PMID： 17502222     DOI： 10.1016/j.rcl.2007.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am        ISSN： 0033-8389            Impact factor:   2.303


  9 in total

1.  Panoramic endoluminal display with minimal image distortion using circumferential radial ray-casting for primary three-dimensional interpretation of CT colonography.

Authors:  Seung Soo Lee; Seong Ho Park; Jin Kook Kim; Namkug Kim; Jeongjin Lee; Beom Jin Park; Young Jun Kim; Min Woo Lee; Ah Young Kim; Hyun Kwon Ha
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  CT colonography with computer-aided detection: recognizing the causes of false-positive reader results.

Authors:  Igor Trilisky; Kristen Wroblewski; Michael W Vannier; John M Horne; Abraham H Dachman
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 3.  CT colonography in the diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer: emphasis on pre- and post-surgical evaluation.

Authors:  Nurhee Hong; Seong Ho Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  CT colonography: computer-aided detection of morphologically flat T1 colonic carcinoma.

Authors:  Stuart A Taylor; Gen Iinuma; Yutaka Saito; Jie Zhang; Steve Halligan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Single-center study comparing computed tomography colonography with conventional colonoscopy.

Authors:  Ian C Roberts-Thomson; Graeme R Tucker; Peter J Hewett; Peter Cheung; Ruben A Sebben; E E Win Khoo; Julie D Marker; Wayne K Clapton
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Colonography by CT, MRI and PET/CT combined with conventional colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening and staging.

Authors:  Long Sun; Hua Wu; Yong-Song Guan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Feasibility of using the marginal blood vessels as reference landmarks for CT colonography.

Authors:  Zhuoshi Wei; Jianhua Yao; Shijun Wang; Jiamin Liu; Andrew J Dwyer; Perry J Pickhardt; Wieslaw L Nowinski; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  CT colonography: avoiding traps and pitfalls.

Authors:  Philippe Lefere; Stefaan Gryspeerdt
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2011-01-04

9.  Value of Virtual Colonoscopy with 64 Row CT in Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Urszula Zaleska-Dorobisz; Mateusz Lasecki; Ewa Nienartowicz; Joanna Pelak; Joanna Słonina; Cyprian Olchowy; Marek Scieżka; Marek Sąsiadek
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2014-09-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.