Literature DB >> 27068051

Decomposing experience-driven attention: Opposite attentional effects of previously predictive cues.

Zhicheng Lin1, Zhong-Lin Lu2, Sheng He3.   

Abstract

A central function of the brain is to track the dynamic statistical regularities in the environment - such as what predicts what over time. How does this statistical learning process alter sensory and attentional processes? Drawing upon animal conditioning and predictive coding, we developed a learning procedure that revealed two distinct components through which prior learning-experience controls attention. During learning, a visual search task was used in which the target randomly appeared at one of several locations but always inside an encloser of a particular color - the learned color served to direct attention to the target location. During test, the color no longer predicted the target location. When the same search task was used in the subsequent test, we found that the learned color continued to attract attention despite the behavior being counterproductive for the task and despite the presence of a completely predictive cue. However, when tested with a flanker task that had minimal location uncertainty - the target was at the fixation surrounded by a distractor - participants were better at ignoring distractors in the learned color than other colors. Evidently, previously predictive cues capture attention in the same search task but can be better suppressed in a flanker task. These results demonstrate opposing components - capture and inhibition - in experience-driven attention, with their manifestations crucially dependent on task context. We conclude that associative learning enhances context-sensitive top-down modulation while it reduces bottom-up sensory drive and facilitates suppression, supporting a learning-based predictive coding account.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention learning; Attentional capture; Experience-driven attention; Inhibition; Task context

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27068051      PMCID: PMC5014634          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-016-1101-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  39 in total

Review 1.  Research review: Attention bias modification (ABM): a novel treatment for anxiety disorders.

Authors:  Yair Bar-Haim
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 8.982

Review 2.  Object perception as Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Daniel Kersten; Pascal Mamassian; Alan Yuille
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  Conditional automaticity in response selection: contingent involuntary response inhibition with varied stimulus-response mapping.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Charles L Folk
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-12-19

4.  Attention-based long-lasting sensitization and suppression of colors.

Authors:  Chia-Huei Tseng; Zoltan Vidnyanszky; Thomas Papathomas; George Sperling
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

6.  Stimulus selection in animal discrimination learning.

Authors:  A R Wagner; F A Logan; K Haberlandt; T Price
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-02

7.  Infant learning: Historical, conceptual, and methodological challenges.

Authors:  Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Infancy       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb

8.  Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations.

Authors:  Christopher Summerfield; Emily H Trittschuh; Jim M Monti; M Marsel Mesulam; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Learning enhances the relative impact of top-down processing in the visual cortex.

Authors:  Hiroshi Makino; Takaki Komiyama
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Hierarchical models in the brain.

Authors:  Karl Friston
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  7 in total

1.  On the distinction between value-driven attention and selection history: Evidence from individuals with depressive symptoms.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Michelle Chiu; Michelle M DiBartolo; Stephanie L Leal
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-10

2.  Automaticity of phasic alertness: Evidence for a three-component model of visual cueing.

Authors:  Zhicheng Lin; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Selection history in context: Evidence for the role of reinforcement learning in biasing attention.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Mark K Britton
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  On the value-dependence of value-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Madeline Halpern
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Isochronous Sequential Presentation Helps Children Orient Their Attention in Time.

Authors:  Katherine A Johnson; Marita Bryan; Kira Polonowita; Delia Decroupet; Jennifer T Coull
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-22

6.  Task relevance modulates the behavioural and neural effects of sensory predictions.

Authors:  Ryszard Auksztulewicz; Karl J Friston; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Rational metareasoning and the plasticity of cognitive control.

Authors:  Falk Lieder; Amitai Shenhav; Sebastian Musslick; Thomas L Griffiths
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 4.475

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.