Nathan S White1, Anders M Dale. 1. Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: While many recent studies have demonstrated improved detection and characterization of malignant lesions using high b-value diffusion imaging techniques, little is known about the underlying physical characteristics of tumor cells that modulate the restricted water signal at high b on clinical scanners. METHODS: Monte Carlo simulations of diffusion in a synthetic tumor cell environment were used to study the specific effects of tumor cell diameter and nuclear volume fraction (ν) on high b diffusion contrast. RESULTS: Results indicate that clinical pulsed-gradient spin-echo diffusion-weighted signals measured at high b (∼4000 s/mm(2)), long diffusion time (Δ ∼40-60 ms), and long echo time (TE ∼60-140 ms) are generally insensitive to tumor cell diameter, but increase exponentially with ν. Moreover, these results are predicted by a simple analytic expression for the intracellular restricted water signal with elevated T2 for the intranuclear versus cytosolic compartment. CONCLUSION: Nuclear volume fraction is an important characteristic of cancer cells that modulates the apparent restriction of water at high b on clinical scanners. This model offers a possible explanation for the apparent unreliable correlation between tumor cell density (cellularity) and traditional ADC.
PURPOSE: While many recent studies have demonstrated improved detection and characterization of malignant lesions using high b-value diffusion imaging techniques, little is known about the underlying physical characteristics of tumor cells that modulate the restricted water signal at high b on clinical scanners. METHODS: Monte Carlo simulations of diffusion in a synthetic tumor cell environment were used to study the specific effects of tumor cell diameter and nuclear volume fraction (ν) on high b diffusion contrast. RESULTS: Results indicate that clinical pulsed-gradient spin-echo diffusion-weighted signals measured at high b (∼4000 s/mm(2)), long diffusion time (Δ ∼40-60 ms), and long echo time (TE ∼60-140 ms) are generally insensitive to tumor cell diameter, but increase exponentially with ν. Moreover, these results are predicted by a simple analytic expression for the intracellular restricted water signal with elevated T2 for the intranuclear versus cytosolic compartment. CONCLUSION: Nuclear volume fraction is an important characteristic of cancer cells that modulates the apparent restriction of water at high b on clinical scanners. This model offers a possible explanation for the apparent unreliable correlation between tumor cell density (cellularity) and traditional ADC.
Authors: T Sugahara; Y Korogi; M Kochi; I Ikushima; Y Shigematu; T Hirai; T Okuda; L Liang; Y Ge; Y Komohara; Y Ushio; M Takahashi Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Nathan S White; Trygve B Leergaard; Helen D'Arceuil; Jan G Bjaalie; Anders M Dale Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2012-01-16 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: R K Gupta; T F Cloughesy; U Sinha; J Garakian; J Lazareff; G Rubino; L Rubino; D P Becker; H V Vinters; J R Alger Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Richard Q Loi; Kelly M Leyden; Akshara Balachandra; Vedang Uttarwar; Donald J Hagler; Brianna M Paul; Anders M Dale; Nathan S White; Carrie R McDonald Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2016-10-13 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: A P Krishnan; R Karunamuni; K M Leyden; T M Seibert; R L Delfanti; J M Kuperman; H Bartsch; P Elbe; A Srikant; A M Dale; S Kesari; D E Piccioni; J A Hattangadi-Gluth; N Farid; C R McDonald; N S White Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2017-03-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Nathan S White; Carrie McDonald; Carrie R McDonald; Niky Farid; Josh Kuperman; David Karow; Natalie M Schenker-Ahmed; Hauke Bartsch; Rebecca Rakow-Penner; Dominic Holland; Ahmed Shabaik; Atle Bjørnerud; Tuva Hope; Jona Hattangadi-Gluth; Michael Liss; J Kellogg Parsons; Clark C Chen; Steve Raman; Daniel Margolis; Robert E Reiter; Leonard Marks; Santosh Kesari; Arno J Mundt; Christopher J Kane; Christopher J Kaine; Bob S Carter; William G Bradley; Anders M Dale Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2014-09-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: R A Rakow-Penner; N S White; J K Parsons; H W Choi; M A Liss; J M Kuperman; N Schenker-Ahmed; H Bartsch; R F Mattrey; W G Bradley; A Shabaik; J Huang; D J A Margolis; S S Raman; L Marks; C J Kane; R E Reiter; D S Karow; A M Dale Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2015-01-06 Impact factor: 5.554
Authors: Ryan L Brunsing; Natalie M Schenker-Ahmed; Nathan S White; J Kellogg Parsons; Christopher Kane; Joshua Kuperman; Hauke Bartsch; Andrew Karim Kader; Rebecca Rakow-Penner; Tyler M Seibert; Daniel Margolis; Steven S Raman; Carrie R McDonald; Nikdokht Farid; Santosh Kesari; Donna Hansel; Ahmed Shabaik; Anders M Dale; David S Karow Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-08-16 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Rebecca A Rakow-Penner; Nathan S White; Daniel J A Margolis; John Kellogg Parsons; Natalie Schenker-Ahmed; Joshua M Kuperman; Hauke Bartsch; Hyung W Choi; William G Bradley; Ahmed Shabaik; Jiaoti Huang; Michael A Liss; Leonard Marks; Christopher J Kane; Robert E Reiter; Steven S Raman; David S Karow; Anders M Dale Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-07-26 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Christopher C Conlin; Christine H Feng; Ana E Rodriguez-Soto; Roshan A Karunamuni; Joshua M Kuperman; Dominic Holland; Rebecca Rakow-Penner; Michael E Hahn; Tyler M Seibert; Anders M Dale Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2020-10-31 Impact factor: 4.813