BACKGROUND/AIMS: Identifying the best method to estimate the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in bariatric surgery patients has important implications for the clinical care of obese patients and research into the impact of obesity and weight reduction on kidney health. We therefore performed such an analysis in patients before and after surgical weight loss. METHODS: Fasting measured GFR (mGFR) by plasma iohexol clearance before and after bariatric surgery was obtained in 36 severely obese individuals. Estimated GFR was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation, the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation using serum creatinine only, the CKD-EPI equation using serum cystatin C only and a recently derived equation that uses both serum creatinine and cystatin C (CKD-EPIcreat-cystC) and then compared to mGFR. RESULTS: Participants were primarily middle-aged white females with a mean baseline body mass index of 46 ± 9, serum creatinine of 0.81 ± 0.24 mg/dl and mGFR of 117 ± 40 ml/min. mGFR had a stronger linear relationship with inverse cystatin C before (r = 0.28, p = 0.09) and after (r = 0.38, p = 0.02) surgery compared to the inverse of creatinine (before: r = 0.26, p = 0.13; after: r = 0.11, p = 0.51). mGFR fell by 17 ± 35 ml/min (p = 0.007) following surgery. The CKD-EPIcreat-cystC was unquestionably the best overall performing estimating equation before and after surgery, revealing very little bias and a capacity to estimate mGFR within 30% of its true value over 80% of the time. This was true whether or not mGFR was indexed for body surface area. CONCLUSIONS: In severely obese bariatric surgery patients with normal kidney function, cystatin C is more strongly associated with mGFR than is serum creatinine. The CKD-EPIcreat-cystC equation best predicted mGFR both before and after surgery.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Identifying the best method to estimate the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in bariatric surgery patients has important implications for the clinical care of obesepatients and research into the impact of obesity and weight reduction on kidney health. We therefore performed such an analysis in patients before and after surgical weight loss. METHODS: Fasting measured GFR (mGFR) by plasma iohexol clearance before and after bariatric surgery was obtained in 36 severely obese individuals. Estimated GFR was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation, the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation using serum creatinine only, the CKD-EPI equation using serum cystatin C only and a recently derived equation that uses both serum creatinine and cystatin C (CKD-EPIcreat-cystC) and then compared to mGFR. RESULTS:Participants were primarily middle-aged white females with a mean baseline body mass index of 46 ± 9, serum creatinine of 0.81 ± 0.24 mg/dl and mGFR of 117 ± 40 ml/min. mGFR had a stronger linear relationship with inverse cystatin C before (r = 0.28, p = 0.09) and after (r = 0.38, p = 0.02) surgery compared to the inverse of creatinine (before: r = 0.26, p = 0.13; after: r = 0.11, p = 0.51). mGFR fell by 17 ± 35 ml/min (p = 0.007) following surgery. The CKD-EPIcreat-cystC was unquestionably the best overall performing estimating equation before and after surgery, revealing very little bias and a capacity to estimate mGFR within 30% of its true value over 80% of the time. This was true whether or not mGFR was indexed for body surface area. CONCLUSIONS: In severely obese bariatric surgery patients with normal kidney function, cystatin C is more strongly associated with mGFR than is serum creatinine. The CKD-EPIcreat-cystC equation best predicted mGFR both before and after surgery.
Authors: E Coll; A Botey; L Alvarez; E Poch; L Quintó; A Saurina; M Vera; C Piera; A Darnell Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Michael G Shlipak; Mark J Sarnak; Ronit Katz; Linda F Fried; Stephen L Seliger; Anne B Newman; David S Siscovick; Catherine Stehman-Breen Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-05-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kasi C McPherson; Corbin A Shields; Bibek Poudel; Brianca Fizer; Alyssa Pennington; Ashley Szabo-Johnson; Willie L Thompson; Denise C Cornelius; Jan M Williams Journal: Am J Physiol Renal Physiol Date: 2018-12-12
Authors: Alex Chang; Tom H Greene; Xuelei Wang; Cynthia Kendrick; Holly Kramer; Jackson Wright; Brad Astor; Tariq Shafi; Robert Toto; Julia Lewis; Lawrence J Appel; Morgan Grams Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2015-06-17 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Daniela S C Magalhães; Jorge M P Pedro; Pedro E B Souteiro; João Sérgio Neves; Sofia Castro-Oliveira; Rita Bettencourt-Silva; Maria Manuel Costa; Ana Varela; Joana Queirós; Paula Freitas; Davide Carvalho Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Casey M Rebholz; Morgan E Grams; Kunihiro Matsushita; Lesley A Inker; Meredith C Foster; Andrew S Levey; Elizabeth Selvin; Josef Coresh Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2015-03-30 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Adrian T Billeter; Stefan Kopf; Martin Zeier; Katharina Scheurlen; Lars Fischer; Thilo M Schulte; Hannes G Kenngott; Barbara Israel; Philipp Knefeli; Markus W Büchler; Peter P Nawroth; Beat P Müller-Stich Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2016-12-09 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Karl J Neff; Gregory Baud; Violeta Raverdy; Robert Caiazzo; Helene Verkindt; Christian Noel; Carel W le Roux; François Pattou Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 4.129