BACKGROUND: Cystatin C is a serum measure of renal function that appears to be independent of age, sex, and lean muscle mass. We compared creatinine and cystatin C levels as predictors of mortality from cardiovascular causes and from all causes in the Cardiovascular Health Study, a cohort study of elderly persons living in the community. METHODS: Creatinine and cystatin C were measured in serum samples collected from 4637 participants at the study visit in 1992 or 1993; follow-up continued until June 30, 2001. For each measure, the study population was divided into quintiles, with the fifth quintile subdivided into thirds (designated 5a, 5b, and 5c). RESULTS: Higher cystatin C levels were directly associated, in a dose-response manner, with a higher risk of death from all causes. As compared with the first quintile, the hazard ratios (and 95 percent confidence intervals) for death were as follows: second quintile, 1.08 (0.86 to 1.35); third quintile, 1.23 (1.00 to 1.53); fourth quintile, 1.34 (1.09 to 1.66); quintile 5a, 1.77 (1.34 to 2.26); 5b, 2.18 (1.72 to 2.78); and 5c, 2.58 (2.03 to 3.27). In contrast, the association of creatinine categories with mortality from all causes appeared to be J-shaped. As compared with the two lowest quintiles combined (cystatin C level, < or =0.99 mg per liter), the highest quintile of cystatin C (> or =1.29 mg per liter) was associated with a significantly elevated risk of death from cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio, 2.27 [1.73 to 2.97]), myocardial infarction (hazard ratio, 1.48 [1.08 to 2.02]), and stroke (hazard ratio, 1.47 [ 1.09 to 1.96]) after multivariate adjustment. The fifth quintile of creatinine, as compared with the first quintile, was not independently associated with any of these three outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Cystatin C, a serum measure of renal function, is a stronger predictor of the risk of death and cardiovascular events in elderly persons than is creatinine. Copyright 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society.
BACKGROUND:Cystatin C is a serum measure of renal function that appears to be independent of age, sex, and lean muscle mass. We compared creatinine and cystatin C levels as predictors of mortality from cardiovascular causes and from all causes in the Cardiovascular Health Study, a cohort study of elderly persons living in the community. METHODS:Creatinine and cystatin C were measured in serum samples collected from 4637 participants at the study visit in 1992 or 1993; follow-up continued until June 30, 2001. For each measure, the study population was divided into quintiles, with the fifth quintile subdivided into thirds (designated 5a, 5b, and 5c). RESULTS: Higher cystatin C levels were directly associated, in a dose-response manner, with a higher risk of death from all causes. As compared with the first quintile, the hazard ratios (and 95 percent confidence intervals) for death were as follows: second quintile, 1.08 (0.86 to 1.35); third quintile, 1.23 (1.00 to 1.53); fourth quintile, 1.34 (1.09 to 1.66); quintile 5a, 1.77 (1.34 to 2.26); 5b, 2.18 (1.72 to 2.78); and 5c, 2.58 (2.03 to 3.27). In contrast, the association of creatinine categories with mortality from all causes appeared to be J-shaped. As compared with the two lowest quintiles combined (cystatin C level, < or =0.99 mg per liter), the highest quintile of cystatin C (> or =1.29 mg per liter) was associated with a significantly elevated risk of death from cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio, 2.27 [1.73 to 2.97]), myocardial infarction (hazard ratio, 1.48 [1.08 to 2.02]), and stroke (hazard ratio, 1.47 [ 1.09 to 1.96]) after multivariate adjustment. The fifth quintile of creatinine, as compared with the first quintile, was not independently associated with any of these three outcomes. CONCLUSIONS:Cystatin C, a serum measure of renal function, is a stronger predictor of the risk of death and cardiovascular events in elderly persons than is creatinine. Copyright 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Authors: Bryan Kestenbaum; Ronit Katz; Ian de Boer; Andy Hoofnagle; Mark J Sarnak; Michael G Shlipak; Nancy S Jenny; David S Siscovick Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2011-09-27 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: R Lertnawapan; A Bian; Y H Rho; P Raggi; A Oeser; J F Solus; T Gebretsadik; A Shintani; C M Stein Journal: Lupus Date: 2011-11-09 Impact factor: 2.911
Authors: Yelena Slinin; Katherine W Peters; Areef Ishani; Kristine Yaffe; Howard A Fink; Katie L Stone; Michael Steffes; Kristine E Ensrud Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2014-11-01 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Shani Shastri; Hocine Tighiouart; Ronit Katz; Dena E Rifkin; Linda F Fried; Michael G Shlipak; Anne B Newman; Mark J Sarnak Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2011-04-21 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Navdeep Tangri; Lesley A Inker; Hocine Tighiouart; Eric Sorensen; Vandana Menon; Gerald Beck; Michael Shlipak; Josef Coresh; Andrew S Levey; Mark J Sarnak Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2011-12-15 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Michelle C Odden; Rebecca Scherzer; Peter Bacchetti; Lynda Anne Szczech; Stephen Sidney; Carl Grunfeld; Michael G Shlipak Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2007-11-12