BACKGROUND: Several reviews have recently detailed the beneficial effects of weight loss surgery for kidney function. However, these studies have a number of limitations, including small sample size, few done in chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 3 and 4, and many not including the main bariatric surgery procedures used in the United States today. STUDY DESIGN: This was an observational retrospective cohort study comparing propensity score-matched bariatric surgery patients and nonsurgery control patients who were referred for, but did not have, surgery. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy were also compared using propensity matching. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Patients (714 surgery patients; 714 controls) were from a large integrated health care system, a mean of 58±8 (SD) years old, and mostly women (77%) and non-Hispanic whites (56%) and had diabetes mellitus (66%) and/or hypertension (91%). PREDICTOR: Predictors at the time of surgery or referral to surgery were age, sex, race/ethnicity, weight, and presence of diabetes and/or hypertension. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome for this study was change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from serum creatinine level over a median 3-year follow-up period. MEASUREMENTS: Serum creatinine was used to calculate eGFR using the CKD-EPI (CKD Epidemiology Collaboration) creatinine equation. RESULTS: Surgery patients had 9.84 (95% CI, 8.05-11.62) mL/min/1.73m2 greater eGFRs than controls at a median 3 years' follow-up and RYGB patients had 6.60 (95% CI, 3.42-9.78) mL/min/1.73m2 greater eGFRs than sleeve gastrectomy patients during the same period. LIMITATIONS: This study is limited by its nonrandomized observational study design, estimation of GFR, and large changes in muscle mass, which may affect serum creatinine level independent of changes in kidney function. CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery, especially the RYGB procedure, results in significant improvements for up to 3 years in eGFRs for patients with CKD stages 3 and 4.
BACKGROUND: Several reviews have recently detailed the beneficial effects of weight loss surgery for kidney function. However, these studies have a number of limitations, including small sample size, few done in chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 3 and 4, and many not including the main bariatric surgery procedures used in the United States today. STUDY DESIGN: This was an observational retrospective cohort study comparing propensity score-matched bariatric surgery patients and nonsurgery control patients who were referred for, but did not have, surgery. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy were also compared using propensity matching. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Patients (714 surgery patients; 714 controls) were from a large integrated health care system, a mean of 58±8 (SD) years old, and mostly women (77%) and non-Hispanic whites (56%) and had diabetes mellitus (66%) and/or hypertension (91%). PREDICTOR: Predictors at the time of surgery or referral to surgery were age, sex, race/ethnicity, weight, and presence of diabetes and/or hypertension. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome for this study was change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from serum creatinine level over a median 3-year follow-up period. MEASUREMENTS: Serum creatinine was used to calculate eGFR using the CKD-EPI (CKD Epidemiology Collaboration) creatinine equation. RESULTS: Surgery patients had 9.84 (95% CI, 8.05-11.62) mL/min/1.73m2 greater eGFRs than controls at a median 3 years' follow-up and RYGB patients had 6.60 (95% CI, 3.42-9.78) mL/min/1.73m2 greater eGFRs than sleeve gastrectomy patients during the same period. LIMITATIONS: This study is limited by its nonrandomized observational study design, estimation of GFR, and large changes in muscle mass, which may affect serum creatinine level independent of changes in kidney function. CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery, especially the RYGB procedure, results in significant improvements for up to 3 years in eGFRs for patients with CKD stages 3 and 4.
Authors: E Loveman; G K Frampton; J Shepherd; J Picot; K Cooper; J Bryant; K Welch; A Clegg Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Andrew D Rule; Steven J Jacobsen; Gary L Schwartz; Thomas H Mosley; Christopher G Scott; Sharon L R Kardia; Eric Boerwinkle; Stephen T Turner Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: Lesley A Stevens; Marcie A Claybon; Christopher H Schmid; Jing Chen; Masaru Horio; Enyu Imai; Robert G Nelson; Manuel Van Deventer; Hai-Yan Wang; Li Zuo; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Andrew S Levey Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2010-11-24 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Andrew D Rule; Richard J Rodeheffer; Timothy S Larson; John C Burnett; Fernando G Cosio; Stephen T Turner; Steven J Jacobsen Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Alex R Chang; Yuan Chen; Christopher Still; G Craig Wood; H Lester Kirchner; Meredith Lewis; Holly Kramer; James E Hartle; David Carey; Lawrence J Appel; Morgan E Grams Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2016-05-12 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Kasi C McPherson; Corbin A Shields; Bibek Poudel; Brianca Fizer; Alyssa Pennington; Ashley Szabo-Johnson; Willie L Thompson; Denise C Cornelius; Jan M Williams Journal: Am J Physiol Renal Physiol Date: 2018-12-12
Authors: Allon N Friedman; Abdus S Wahed; Junyao Wang; Anita P Courcoulas; Gregory Dakin; Marcelo W Hinojosa; Paul L Kimmel; James E Mitchell; Alfons Pomp; Walter J Pories; Jonathan Q Purnell; Carel le Roux; Konstantinos Spaniolas; Kristine J Steffen; Richard Thirlby; Bruce Wolfe Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2018-01-15 Impact factor: 10.121