Literature DB >> 10343847

Stereopsis, cyclovergence and the backwards tilt of the vertical horopter.

J Siderov1, R S Harwerth, H E Bedell.   

Abstract

It is generally recognized that the vertical horopter has a backwards tilt such that it passes through the fixation point and a point near the feet of the observer. The basis of the tilt has been attributed to either a shear in binocular retinal correspondence along the vertical meridian or the presence of cyclovergence eye movements. In an attempt to determine empirically the mechanisms underlying the tilt of the vertical horopter, retinal correspondence along the vertical meridian was investigated as a function of viewing distance. In addition, binocular measurements of torsional eye position were made in the same observers under similar viewing conditions. The vertical horopter was determined using two criteria. In the first instance, increment depth discrimination thresholds for both crossed and uncrossed disparities were measured as a function of retinal eccentricity along the vertical meridian, up to 5 degrees superiorly and inferiorly, and the horopter was defined by the region in space which had the lowest stereo-threshold. Secondly, subjective alignment of dichoptically presented nonius lines defined the horopter by identical visual directions. Both criteria were used to determine the horopter at 2 m while only the criterion of identical visual direction was used at the nearer distance of 50 cm. The vertical horopter showed a backwards tilt that decreased from an average of about 12 degrees at 2 m to 3 degrees at 50 cm, with some variability between observers. Torsional eye position did not change significantly between fixation distances. These results confirmed the geometric relation between the backwards tilt in the vertical horopter and fixation distance and support Helmholtz's original contention that the tilt is a consequence of a shear in retinal correspondence in the vertical meridian.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10343847     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00252-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  9 in total

1.  Vergence eye movements are not essential for stereoscopic depth.

Authors:  Arthur J Lugtigheid; Laurie M Wilcox; Robert S Allison; Ian P Howard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Binocular Eye Movements Are Adapted to the Natural Environment.

Authors:  Agostino Gibaldi; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Three-dimensional ocular kinematics underlying binocular single vision.

Authors:  Bernhard J M Hess; H Misslisch
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The vertical horopter is not adaptable, but it may be adaptive.

Authors:  Emily A Cooper; Johannes Burge; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Blur and disparity are complementary cues to depth.

Authors:  Robert T Held; Emily A Cooper; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Stereopsis is adaptive for the natural environment.

Authors:  William W Sprague; Emily A Cooper; Ivana Tošić; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 14.136

7.  The Active Side of Stereopsis: Fixation Strategy and Adaptation to Natural Environments.

Authors:  Agostino Gibaldi; Andrea Canessa; Silvio P Sabatini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The upper disparity limit increases gradually with eccentricity.

Authors:  Saeideh Ghahghaei; Suzanne McKee; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  The blur horopter: Retinal conjugate surface in binocular viewing.

Authors:  Agostino Gibaldi; Vivek Labhishetty; Larry N Thibos; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.