Literature DB >> 4446365

Local versus global stereopsis: two mechanisms?

W Richards, M G Kaye.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  1974        PMID: 4446365     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(74)90008-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

1.  How to use individual differences to isolate functional organization, biology, and utility of visual functions; with illustrative proposals for stereopsis.

Authors:  Jeremy B Wilmer
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2008

2.  Vergence eye movements are not essential for stereoscopic depth.

Authors:  Arthur J Lugtigheid; Laurie M Wilcox; Robert S Allison; Ian P Howard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Neural mechanisms underlying binocular fusion and stereopsis: position vs. phase.

Authors:  A Anzai; I Ohzawa; R D Freeman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-05-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Perception of depth: processing of simple positional disparity as a function of viewing distance.

Authors:  M Ritter
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1979-03

Review 5.  Field processes in stereovision. A description of stereopsis appropriate to ophthalmology and visual perception.

Authors:  T Shipley
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Stereoscopic cooperation between the fovea of one eye and the periphery of the other eye at large disparities. Implications for anomalous retinal correspondence in strabismus.

Authors:  B Dengler; G Kommerell
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 7.  3-D vision and figure-ground separation by visual cortex.

Authors:  S Grossberg
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-01

8.  On the depth of the cyclopean retina.

Authors:  C W Tyler; B Julesz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  A Neural Model of Distance-Dependent Percept of Object Size Constancy.

Authors:  Jiehui Qian; Arash Yazdanbakhsh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The upper disparity limit increases gradually with eccentricity.

Authors:  Saeideh Ghahghaei; Suzanne McKee; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.