| Literature DB >> 24349364 |
Shian-Shiang Wang1, Yu-Fan Liu2, Yen-Chuan Ou3, Chuan-Shu Chen3, Jian-Ri Li3, Shun-Fa Yang4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Carbonic anhydrase 9 (CA9) is reportedly overexpressed in several types of carcinomas and is generally considered a marker of malignancy. The current study explored the effect of CA9 gene polymorphisms on the susceptibility of developing urothelial cell carcinoma (UCC) and the clinicopathological status. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24349364 PMCID: PMC3862582 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082804
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
The distributions of demographical characteristics in 221 controls and 221 patients with urothelial cell carcinoma.
| Variable | Controls (N = 221) | Patients (N = 221) | p value |
|
|
|
| |
| 67.85±8.52 | 68.52±11.79 | P = 0.488 | |
|
|
|
| |
| Male | 139 (62.9%) | 139 (62.9%) | |
| Female | 82 (37.1%) | 82 (37.1%) | p = 1.000 |
|
| |||
| No | 165 (74.7%) | 158 (71.5%) | |
| Yes | 56 (25.3%) | 63 (28.5%) | p = 0.453 |
|
| |||
| Superficial tumor (pTa–pT1) | 138 (62.4%) | ||
| Invasive tumor (pT2–pT4) | 83 (37.6%) | ||
|
| |||
| T0 | 64 (29.0%) | ||
| T1-T4 | 157 (71.0%) | ||
|
| |||
| N0 | 204 (92.3%) | ||
| N1+N2 | 17 (7.7%) | ||
|
| |||
| M0 | 218 (98.6%) | ||
| M1 | 3 (1.4%) | ||
|
| |||
| Low grade | 34 (15.4%) | ||
| High grade | 187 (84.6%) |
’s exact test was used between healthy controls and patients with urothelial cell carcinoma. Mann-Whitney U test or Fisher
Distribution frequency of CA9 genotypes in 221 controls and 221 patients with urothelial cell carcinoma.
| Variable | Controls (N = 221) n (%) | Patients (N = 221) n (%) | OR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) |
|
| ||||
| AA | 59 (26.7%) | 60 (27.1%) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| AG | 104 (47.1%) | 102 (46.2%) | 0.964 (0.614–1.515) | 0.990 (0.589–1.665) |
| GG | 58 (26.2%) | 59 (26.7%) | 1.000 (0.600–1.666) | 0.987 (0.539–1.809) |
| AG+GG | 162 (73.3%) | 161 (72.9%) | 0.977 (0.642–1.488) | 0.989 (0.608–1.609) |
|
| ||||
| AA | 205 (92.8%) | 204 (92.3%) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| AG | 16 (7.2%) | 17 (7.7%) | 1.068 (0.525–2.171) | 0.793 (0.344–1.828) |
| GG | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | -- | -- |
| AG+GG | 16 (7.2%) | 17 (7.7%) | 1.068 (0.525–2.171) | 0.793 (0.344–1.828) |
|
| ||||
| CC | 196 (88.7%) | 180 (81.4%) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| CA | 24 (10.9%) | 38 (17.2%) | 1.724 (0.995–2.987) |
|
| AA | 1 (0.4%) | 3 (1.4%) | 3.267 (0.337–31.689) | 4.716 (0.363–61.319) |
| CA+AA | 25 (11.3%) | 41 (18.6%) |
|
|
|
| ||||
| INS/INS | 170 (76.9%) | 165 (74.7%) | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| INS/Del | 50 (22.6%) | 50 (22.6%) | 1.030 (0.659–1.611) | 0.921 (0.551–1.537) |
| Del/Del | 1 (0.5%) | 6 (2.7%) | 6.182 (0.736–51.905) | 5.532 (0.558–54.844) |
| INS/Del+ Del/Del | 51 (23.1%) | 56 (25.3%) | 1.131 (0.732–1.749) | 1.062 (0.644–1.751) |
% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by logistic regression models. The adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by multiple logistic regression models after controlling for age and gender. * p value < 0.05 as statistically significant. The odds ratios (ORs) and with their 95
Distribution frequency of the clinical status and CA9 rs1048638 genotype frequencies in 221 patients with urothelial cell carcinoma.
| Genotypic frequencies | ||||
| Variable | CC ( | CA+ AA ( | OR (95% CI) | p value |
|
| ||||
| Superficial tumor (pTa–pT1) | 119 (66.1%) | 19 (46.3%) | 1.00 | |
| Invasive tumor (pT2–pT4) | 61 (33.9%) | 22 (53.7%) |
|
|
|
| ||||
| T0 | 53 (29.4%) | 11 (26.8%) | 1.00 | |
| T1–T4 | 127 (70.6%) | 30 (73.2%) | 1.138 (0.531–2.438) | p = 0.739 |
|
| ||||
| N0 | 169 (93.9%) | 35 (85.4%) | 1.00 | |
| N1+N2 | 11 (6.1%) | 6 (14.6%) | 2.634 (0.913–7.596) | p = 0.065 |
|
| ||||
| M0 | 179 (99.4%) | 39 (95.1%) | 1.00 | |
| M1 | 1 (0.6%) | 2 (4.9%) | 2.463 (0.497–12.219) | p = 0.065 |
|
| ||||
| Low grade | 27 (15.0%) | 7 (17.1%) | 1.00 | |
| High grade | 153 (85.0%) | 34 (82.9%) | 0.857 (0.345–2.131) | p = 0.740 |
Distribution frequency of the clinical status and CA9 rs1048638 genotype frequencies in 221 patients with urothelial cell carcinoma with non-smoker and smoker.
| Non-Smoking (n = 158) | Smoking (n = 63) | |||||||
| Variable | CC ( | CA+AA ( | OR (95% CI) | p value | CC ( | CA+AA ( | OR (95% CI) | p value |
|
| ||||||||
| Superficial tumor (pTa–pT1) | 81 (63.3%) | 15 (50.0%) | 1.00 | 38 (73.1%) | 4 (36.4%) | 1.00 | ||
| Invasive tumor (pT2–pT4) | 47 (36.7%) | 15 (50.0%) | 1.723 (0.774–3.839) | p = 0.180 | 14 (26.9%) | 7 (63.6%) |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| T0 | 33 (25.8%) | 8 (26.7%) | 1.00 | 20 (38.5%) | 3 (27.3%) | 1.00 | ||
| T1–T4 | 95 (74.2%) | 22 (73.3%) | 0.955 (0.388–2.352) | p = 0.921 | 32 (61.5%) | 8 (72.7%) | 1.667 (0.395–7.033) | p = 0.476 |
|
| ||||||||
| N0 | 120 (93.8%) | 26 (86.7%) | 1.00 | 49 (94.2%) | 9 (81.8%) | 1.00 | ||
| N1+N2 | 8 (6.3%) | 4 (13.3%) | 2.308 (0.646–8.241) | p = 0.187 | 3 (5.8%) | 2 (18.2%) | 2.634 (0.913–7.596) | p = 0.166 |
|
| ||||||||
| M0 | 128 (99.4%) | 29 (96.7%) | 1.00 | 51 (98.1%) | 10 (90.9%) | 1.00 | ||
| M1 | 0 (0%) | 1 (3.3%) | ----- | p = 0.067 | 1 (1.9%) | 1 (9.1%) | 5.100 (0.294–88.476) | p = 0.283 |
|
| ||||||||
| Low grade | 16 (12.5%) | 5 (16.7%) | 1.00 | 11 (21.2%) | 2 (18.2%) | 1.00 | ||
| High grade | 112 (87.5%) | 25 (83.3%) | 0.714 (0.239–2.133) | p = 0.545 | 41 (78.8%) | 9 (81.8%) | 1.207 (0.227–6.416) | p = 0.823 |