| Literature DB >> 28667334 |
Kuo-Tai Hua1, Yu-Fan Liu2,3, Chia-Lang Hsu4, Tsu-Yao Cheng5,6, Ching-Yao Yang7, Jeng-Shou Chang8, Wei-Jiunn Lee9,10, Michael Hsiao8, Hsueh-Fen Juan4, Ming-Hsien Chien11,12, Shun-Fa Yang13,14.
Abstract
Carbonic anhydrase IX (CA9) expression level has been considered as a poor prognostic factor in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. However, the judging criteria of CA9 level is hard to define for potential clinical applications. Unlike CA9 expression level, CA9 polymorphism is poorly documented in HCC. Here, we found that people carry A allele at CA9 rs1048638, a 3'UTR SNP, has higher risk of HCC. rs1048638-CA correlates with advanced stages, larger tumor sizes, more vascular invasion, and shorter survival of HCC patients. A allele at CA9 rs1048638 impairs miR-34a, a tumor suppressor miRNA in HCC, binding to CA9 3'UTR and desensitizes CA9 mRNA to miR-34a-dependent RNA degradation. CA9 expression levels were also correlated with miR-34a levels and rs1048638 genotypes in HCC patients. rs1048638 influences HCC risk and progression through effects on miR-34a-targeted CA9 expression in HCC. In conclusion, genetic variations of the CA9 3'UTR play important roles in regulating CA9 expression and cancer progression, which is a novel determinant and target for HCC metastasis and prognosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28667334 PMCID: PMC5493636 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-04732-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Association of rs1048638 with survival of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. (A) Schematic illustration of CA9 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) evaluate in HCC. (B) Kaplan-Meier analysis of the correlation between rs1048638 genotypes and overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of 86 HCC patients. (C) Kaplan-Meier analysis of the correlation between CA9 expression levels and OS or DFS of 86 HCC patients.
Clinical status and CA9 rs1048638 genotypic frequencies in 312 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
| Variable | CC ( | CA + AA ( | OR (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Stage I/II | 172 (67.5%) | 30 (52.6%) | 1.00 | 0.034* |
| Stage III/IV | 83 (32.5%) | 27 (47.4%) | 1.865 (1.042~3.338) | |
|
| ||||
| ≤T2 | 176 (69.0%) | 30 (52.6%) | 1.00 | 0.018* |
| T2 | 79 (31.0%) | 27 (47.4%) | 2.005 (1.118~3.595) | |
|
| ||||
| No | 220 (86.3%) | 39 (68.4%) | 1.00 | 0.001* |
| Yes | 35 (13.7%) | 18 (31.6%) | 2.901 (1.495~5.628) | |
|
| ||||
| No | 243 (95.3%) | 51 (89.5%) | 1.00 | 0.088 |
| Yes | 12 (4.7%) | 6 (10.5%) | 2.382 (0.854~6.643) | |
|
| ||||
| A | 191 (74.9%) | 47 (82.5%) | 1.00 | 0.225 |
| B or C | 64 (25.1%) | 10 (17.5%) | 0.635 (0.303~1.329) | |
|
| ||||
| Negative | 151 (59.2%) | 28 (49.1%) | 1.00 | 0.164 |
| Positive | 104 (40.8%) | 29 (50.9%) | 1.504 (0.845~2.676) | |
|
| ||||
| Negative | 132 (51.8%) | 31 (54.4%) | 1.00 | 0.720 |
| Positive | 123 (48.2%) | 26 (45.6%) | 0.900 (0.506~1.601) | |
|
| ||||
| Negative | 53 (20.8%) | 12 (21.1%) | 1.00 | 0.984 |
| Positive | 202 (79.2%) | 45 (78.9%) | 0.984 (0.486~1.991) | |
See also Tables S1–S5.
T2: multiple tumor of >5 cm or tumor involving a major branch of the portal or hepatic veins.
HBsAg, surface antigen of hepatitis virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Univariate and multivariate analyses of potential prognostic variables in 86 hepatocellular carcinoma patients.
| Parameters | Comparison | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) |
| HR (95% CI) |
| ||
|
| CC; CA | 0.39 (0.20 to 0.77) | 0.0075* | 0.44 (0.21 to 0.92) | 0.029* |
|
| High(>median); Low (≤median) | 0.48 (0.24 to 0.97) | 0.042* | 0.48 (0.21 to 1.07) | 0.07 |
| Cirrhosis | Yes; No | 1.36 (0.67 to 2.74) | 0.393 | 1.35 (0.064 to 2.86) | 0.436 |
| Histological grade | G1, 2; G3, 4 | 1.96 (0.96 to 3.98) | 0.07 | 1.25 (0.58 to 2.71) | 0.57 |
| Vascular invasion | Yes; No | 2.38 (1.11 to 5.09) | 0.026* | 1.91 (0.84 to 4.33) | 0.122 |
| Viral status | HBV+; HBV− | 0.82 (0.41 to 1.61) | 0.563 | 0.66 (0.30 to 1.49) | 0.729 |
*Two-sided Cox proportional hazards regression using normal approximation.
HBV, hepatitis B virus; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Figure 2The CA9 polymorphism determines the response to miR-34a targeting. (A) Schematic illustration of miRNA target sites and the rs1048638 position on the CA9 3′untranslated region (UTR). (B) CA9 3′UTR reporters were transfected with the indicated miRNA or scrambled control (NC) mimics into 293T cells. Luciferase activities were measured and are shown as multiples of the control. (C) A minimum free energy (MFE) analysis of the alignment between miR-34a and the CA9 3′UTR with an “A’ or “C” allele at rs1048638. (D) Upper panel: Western blot analysis of CA9 in HCC cell lines. The rs1048638 genotype of each cell line is labeled below the blot. Lower panel: Quantitative analysis of miR-34a levels in HCC cell lines. Data are presented normalized to the miR-34a level of Mahlavu cells. (E) Upper panel: Western blot analysis of CA9 in PLC5 and Huh7 cells transfected with miR-34a or the control mimic, respectively. miR-34a expression levels are shown in the middle panel. CA9 RNA expression levels are shown in the lower panel. Three independent replicates were performed in each experiment. Error bars, ±S.D. *p < 0.05 by a two-sided Student’s t-test. GAPDH was used as a loading control.
Figure 3The miR-34a/CA9 axis regulates cell proliferation and mobility of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). (A) Migration, invasion, and colony formation assays were conducted after infection with a lentivirus carrying CA9 shRNAs or scrambled shRNA in PLC5 and Mahlavu cells. Upper panels: Western blot analysis of CA9. Middle panels: Migration/invasion abilities of CA9 knockdown cells. Lower panel: Colony formation abilities of CA9 knockdown cells. Representative micrographs of colony formation assays shown above the plot. (B,C) Migration, invasion, and colony formation assays were conducted after transfection of miR-34a or a control plasmid in Mahlavu and PLC5 cells. miR-34a and CA9 expression levels were examined by Western blotting and a real-time PCR, respectively, as shown in the upper two panels. Middle panels: Migration/invasion abilities of miR-34a-overexpressing cells. Lower panel: Colony formation abilities of miR-34a-overexpressing cells. Representative micrographs of colony formation assays shown above the plot. (D) Control and miR-34a-overexpressing Mahlavu cells were infected with lentiviruses carrying either control or CA9-V5 for 48 h and subjected to transwell migration and invasion assays. Migrated/invaded cells are presented as multiples of the control. Three independent replicates were performed for each experiment. Error bars, ±S.D. *p < 0.05 by two-sided Student’s t-test.
Figure 4The miR-34a/CA9 axis regulates metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in vivo. Mahlavu/Luc cells (106) stably expressing CA9 shRNA-2 or miR-34a were orthotopically injected into NOD/SCID mice for 5 weeks. The tumor burden in the liver and metastases to the pancreas or mesenteries were estimated by luciferase activities. Representative photon images of the liver, pancreas, or mesentery were taken after sacrifice. (A) The tumor burden in the liver and metastases of CA9-knockdown cells. (B) The tumor burden in the liver and metastases of miR-34a- and/or CA9-V5 overexpressing cells. Statistical significance was assayed by two-sided Student’s t-test. p values are labeled in the plot.
Figure 5Association of rs1048638 with CA9 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. (A) RNA expression scatter diagrams of CA9 mRNA versus miR-34a. Black dots represent expression levels of both genes from specimens in TCGA HCC dataset; the regression line is shown on the plot. (B) Correlations between CA9 mRNA levels and rs1048638 genotypes in 86 HCC specimens. *p < 0.05 by Chi-squared test. (C) CA9 mRNA versus miR-34a expression scatter diagrams of specimens from rs1048638-CC or rs1048638-AA/CA cohorts. Statistical significance of (A) and (C) was assayed by Spearman’s rank correlation test. p values are labeled in the plot.