Literature DB >> 19706757

Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes, smoking, and bladder cancer risk: findings from the international consortium of bladder cancer.

Mariana C Stern1, Jie Lin, Jonine D Figueroa, Karl T Kelsey, Anne E Kiltie, Jian-Min Yuan, Giuseppe Matullo, Tony Fletcher, Simone Benhamou, Jack A Taylor, Donatella Placidi, Zuo-Feng Zhang, Gunnar Steineck, Nathaniel Rothman, Manolis Kogevinas, Debra Silverman, Nuria Malats, Stephen Chanock, Xifeng Wu, Margaret R Karagas, Angeline S Andrew, Heather H Nelson, D Timothy Bishop, Sei Chung Sak, Ananya Choudhury, Jennifer H Barrett, Faye Elliot, Román Corral, Amit D Joshi, Manuela Gago-Dominguez, Victoria K Cortessis, Yong-Bing Xiang, Yu-Tang Gao, Paolo Vineis, Carlotta Sacerdote, Simonetta Guarrera, Silvia Polidoro, Alessandra Allione, Eugen Gurzau, Kvetoslava Koppova, Rajiv Kumar, Peter Rudnai, Stefano Porru, Angela Carta, Marcello Campagna, Cecilia Arici, Sung Shim Lani Park, Montserrat Garcia-Closas.   

Abstract

Tobacco smoking is the most important and well-established bladder cancer risk factor and a rich source of chemical carcinogens and reactive oxygen species that can induce damage to DNA in urothelial cells. Therefore, common variation in DNA repair genes might modify bladder cancer risk. In this study, we present results from meta-analyses and pooled analyses conducted as part of the International Consortium of Bladder Cancer. We included data on 10 single nucleotide polymorphisms corresponding to seven DNA repair genes from 13 studies. Pooled analyses and meta-analyses included 5,282 cases and 5,954 controls of non-Latino white origin. We found evidence for weak but consistent associations with ERCC2 D312N [rs1799793; per-allele odds ratio (OR), 1.10; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.01-1.19; P = 0.021], NBN E185Q (rs1805794; per-allele OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01-1.18; P = 0.028), and XPC A499V (rs2228000; per-allele OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.00-1.21; P = 0.044). The association with NBN E185Q was limited to ever smokers (interaction P = 0.002) and was strongest for the highest levels of smoking dose and smoking duration. Overall, our study provides the strongest evidence to date for a role of common variants in DNA repair genes in bladder carcinogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19706757      PMCID: PMC2782435          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  47 in total

1.  Functional significance of XPD polymorphic variants: attenuated apoptosis in human lymphoblastoid cells with the XPD 312 Asp/Asp genotype.

Authors:  H Seker; D Butkiewicz; E D Bowman; M Rusin; M Hedayati; L Grossman; C C Harris
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  DNA repair gene XRCC3 codon 241 polymorphism, its interaction with smoking and XRCC1 polymorphisms, and bladder cancer risk.

Authors:  Mariana C Stern; David M Umbach; Ruth M Lunn; Jack A Taylor
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  A field synopsis on low-penetrance variants in DNA repair genes and cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  Paolo Vineis; Maurizio Manuguerra; Fotini K Kavvoura; Simonetta Guarrera; Alessandra Allione; Fabio Rosa; Alessandra Di Gregorio; Silvia Polidoro; Federica Saletta; John P A Ioannidis; Giuseppe Matullo
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  DNA damage in human transitional cell carcinoma cells after exposure to the proximate metabolite of the bladder carcinogen 4-aminobiphenyl.

Authors:  M S Burger; J L Torino; S Swaminathan
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.216

5.  XPD codon 751 polymorphism, metabolism genes, smoking, and bladder cancer risk.

Authors:  Mariana C Stern; Laura R Johnson; Douglas A Bell; Jack A Taylor
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  DNA repair gene XRCC1 polymorphisms, smoking, and bladder cancer risk.

Authors:  M C Stern; D M Umbach; C H van Gils; R M Lunn; J A Taylor
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Gender- and smoking-related bladder cancer risk.

Authors:  J E Castelao; J M Yuan; P L Skipper; S R Tannenbaum; M Gago-Dominguez; J S Crowder; R K Ross; M C Yu
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-04-04       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Identification of aminobiphenyl derivatives in commercial hair dyes.

Authors:  Robert J Turesky; James P Freeman; Ricky D Holland; Daniel M Nestorick; Dwight W Miller; D Luke Ratnasinghe; Fred F Kadlubar
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.739

9.  Polymorphisms of the DNA repair genes XRCC1, XRCC3, XPD, interaction with environmental exposures, and bladder cancer risk in a case-control study in northern Italy.

Authors:  Min Shen; Rayjean J Hung; Paul Brennan; Christian Malaveille; Francesco Donato; Donatella Placidi; Angela Carta; Agnes Hautefeuille; Paolo Boffetta; Stefano Porru
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  N-oxidation of aromatic amines by intracellular oxidases.

Authors:  Arno G Siraki; Tom S Chan; Giuseppe Galati; Shirley Teng; Peter J O'Brien
Journal:  Drug Metab Rev       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.518

View more
  54 in total

1.  Comprehensive analyses of DNA repair pathways, smoking and bladder cancer risk in Los Angeles and Shanghai.

Authors:  Roman Corral; Juan Pablo Lewinger; David Van Den Berg; Amit D Joshi; Jian-Min Yuan; Manuela Gago-Dominguez; Victoria K Cortessis; Malcolm C Pike; David V Conti; Duncan C Thomas; Christopher K Edlund; Yu-Tang Gao; Yong-Bing Xiang; Wei Zhang; Yu-Chen Su; Mariana C Stern
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Associations between NBS1 polymorphisms, haplotypes and smoking-related cancers.

Authors:  Sungshim L Park; Delara Bastani; Binh Y Goldstein; Shen-Chih Chang; Wendy Cozen; Lin Cai; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; Baoguo Ding; Sander Greenland; Na He; Shehnaz K Hussain; Qingwu Jiang; Yuan-Chin A Lee; Simin Liu; Ming-Lan Lu; Thomas M Mack; Jenny T Mao; Hal Morgenstern; Li-Na Mu; Sam S Oh; Allan Pantuck; Jeanette C Papp; Jianyu Rao; Victor E Reuter; Donald P Tashkin; Hua Wang; Nai-Chieh Y You; Shun-Zhang Yu; Jin-Kou Zhao; Zuo-Feng Zhang
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 4.944

Review 3.  Urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: definition, treatment and future efforts.

Authors:  Sandip M Prasad; G Joel Decastro; Gary D Steinberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  The association between the Lys751Gln polymorphism in the XPD gene and the risk of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Tianyuan Xiong; Jiqiao Yang; Haichuan Wang; Fanyi Wu; Yang Liu; Rui Xu; Zi Lv; Pei Xue; Wen Cao; Yonggang Zhang
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 2.316

5.  DNA Damage Response and Repair Gene Alterations Are Associated with Improved Survival in Patients with Platinum-Treated Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Min Yuen Teo; Richard M Bambury; Emily C Zabor; Emmet Jordan; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Mariel E Boyd; Nancy Bouvier; Stephanie A Mullane; Eugene K Cha; Nitin Roper; Irina Ostrovnaya; David M Hyman; Bernard H Bochner; Maria E Arcila; David B Solit; Michael F Berger; Dean F Bajorin; Joaquim Bellmunt; Gopakumar Iyer; Jonathan E Rosenberg
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Genetic susceptibility to bladder cancer risk and outcome.

Authors:  Jian Gu; Xifeng Wu
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Impacts of ICAM-1 gene polymorphisms on urothelial cell carcinoma susceptibility and clinicopathologic characteristics in Taiwan.

Authors:  Shian-Shiang Wang; Ming-Ju Hsieh; Yen-Chuan Ou; Chuan-Shu Chen; Jian-Ri Li; Pei-Ching Hsiao; Shun-Fa Yang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-05-02

Review 8.  Cruciferous Vegetables, Isothiocyanates, and Bladder Cancer Prevention.

Authors:  Besma Abbaoui; Christopher R Lucas; Ken M Riedl; Steven K Clinton; Amir Mortazavi
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 5.914

Review 9.  Review of the Gene-Environment Interaction Literature in Cancer: What Do We Know?

Authors:  Naoko I Simonds; Armen A Ghazarian; Camilla B Pimentel; Sheri D Schully; Gary L Ellison; Elizabeth M Gillanders; Leah E Mechanic
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 2.135

Review 10.  Bioinformatics challenges for genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Jason H Moore; Folkert W Asselbergs; Scott M Williams
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.