PURPOSE: The aims of the study were (a) to evaluate the diagnostic role, by means of positive detection rate (PDR), of ¹⁸F-choline (CH) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT in patients with prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy, with curative intent, and suspicion of relapse during follow-up, (b) to correlate the PDR with trigger prostate-specific antigen (PSA), (c) to investigate the possible influence of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) at the time of scan on PDR and (d) to assess distribution of metastatic spread. METHODS: ¹⁸F-CH PET/CT exams from 46 consecutive patients (mean age 71.3 years, range 51-84 years) with prostate cancer (mean Gleason score 6.4, range 5-8) previously treated by definitive radiotherapy and with suspicion of relapse with negative or inconclusive conventional imaging were retrospectively evaluated. Of the 46 patients, 12 were treated with brachytherapy and 34 with external beam radiation therapy. Twenty-three patients were under ADT at the time of the examination. Trigger PSA was measured within 1 month before the exam (mean value 6.5 ng/ml, range 1.1-49.4 ng/ml). Patients were subdivided into four groups according to their PSA level: 1.0 < PSA ≤ 2.0 ng/ml (11 patients), 2.0 < PSA ≤ 4.0 ng/ml (16 patients), 4.0 < PSA ≤ 6.0 ng/ml (9 patients) and PSA > 6.0 ng/ml (10 patients). Correlation between ADT and PDR was investigated as well as between PSA and distribution of metastatic spread. RESULTS: The overall PDR of ¹⁸F-CH PET/CT was 80.4% (37/46 patients), increasing with the increase of trigger PSA. PDR of ¹⁸F-CH PET/CT is not influenced by ADT (p = 0.710) even if PET performed under ADT demonstrated an overall higher PDR (82.6%). The majority of the patients (59%, 22/37 patients) showed local relapse only, confined to the prostatic bed; 22% of the PET/CT-positive patients (8/37 patients) showed distant relapse only (bone localizations in all of them), while the remaining 19% (7/37 patients) showed both local and distant (lymph node and bone) spread. CONCLUSION: ¹⁸F-CH PET/CT showed a high overall detection rate (80%), proportional to the trigger PSA (both for local and distant relapse) not influenced by ADT. ¹⁸F-CH PET/CT is proposed as a first-line imaging procedure in restaging prostate cancer patients primarily treated with radiotherapy.
PURPOSE: The aims of the study were (a) to evaluate the diagnostic role, by means of positive detection rate (PDR), of ¹⁸F-choline (CH) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT in patients with prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy, with curative intent, and suspicion of relapse during follow-up, (b) to correlate the PDR with trigger prostate-specific antigen (PSA), (c) to investigate the possible influence of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) at the time of scan on PDR and (d) to assess distribution of metastatic spread. METHODS: ¹⁸F-CH PET/CT exams from 46 consecutive patients (mean age 71.3 years, range 51-84 years) with prostate cancer (mean Gleason score 6.4, range 5-8) previously treated by definitive radiotherapy and with suspicion of relapse with negative or inconclusive conventional imaging were retrospectively evaluated. Of the 46 patients, 12 were treated with brachytherapy and 34 with external beam radiation therapy. Twenty-three patients were under ADT at the time of the examination. Trigger PSA was measured within 1 month before the exam (mean value 6.5 ng/ml, range 1.1-49.4 ng/ml). Patients were subdivided into four groups according to their PSA level: 1.0 < PSA ≤ 2.0 ng/ml (11 patients), 2.0 < PSA ≤ 4.0 ng/ml (16 patients), 4.0 < PSA ≤ 6.0 ng/ml (9 patients) and PSA > 6.0 ng/ml (10 patients). Correlation between ADT and PDR was investigated as well as between PSA and distribution of metastatic spread. RESULTS: The overall PDR of ¹⁸F-CH PET/CT was 80.4% (37/46 patients), increasing with the increase of trigger PSA. PDR of ¹⁸F-CH PET/CT is not influenced by ADT (p = 0.710) even if PET performed under ADT demonstrated an overall higher PDR (82.6%). The majority of the patients (59%, 22/37 patients) showed local relapse only, confined to the prostatic bed; 22% of the PET/CT-positive patients (8/37 patients) showed distant relapse only (bone localizations in all of them), while the remaining 19% (7/37 patients) showed both local and distant (lymph node and bone) spread. CONCLUSION: ¹⁸F-CH PET/CT showed a high overall detection rate (80%), proportional to the trigger PSA (both for local and distant relapse) not influenced by ADT. ¹⁸F-CH PET/CT is proposed as a first-line imaging procedure in restaging prostate cancerpatients primarily treated with radiotherapy.
Authors: Axel Heidenreich; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Steven Joniau; Malcolm Mason; Vsevolod Matveev; Nicolas Mottet; Hans-Peter Schmid; Theo van der Kwast; Thomas Wiegel; Filliberto Zattoni Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2010-10-28 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: B J Krause; M Souvatzoglou; M Tuncel; K Herrmann; A K Buck; C Praus; T Schuster; H Geinitz; U Treiber; M Schwaiger Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2007-09-22 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Onisuru T Okotie; William J Aronson; Jeff A Wieder; Yen Liao; Fred Dorey; Jean B DeKERNION; Stephen J Freedland Journal: J Urol Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Piyush K Agarwal; Natalia Sadetsky; Badrinath R Konety; Martin I Resnick; Peter R Carroll Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-01-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Giampiero Giovacchini; Elena Incerti; Paola Mapelli; Margarita Kirienko; Alberto Briganti; Giorgio Gandaglia; Francesco Montorsi; Luigi Gianolli; Maria Picchio Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-02-20 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: P Samper Ots; A Luis Cardo; C Vallejo Ocaña; M A Cabeza Rodríguez; L A Glaria Enríquez; M L Couselo Paniagua; J Olivera Vegas Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2018-11-17 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: David Pfister; Daniel Porres; Axel Heidenreich; Isabel Heidegger; Ruth Knuechel; Florian Steib; Florian F Behrendt; Frederik A Verburg Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2016-03-19 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Christian M Zechmann; Anna Malcher; Matthias Eder; Michael Eisenhut; Heinz G Linhart; Tim Holland-Letz; Boris A Hadaschik; Frederik L Giesel; Jürgen Debus; Uwe Haberkorn Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2013-09-27 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Arnoldo Piccardo; Francesco Paparo; Riccardo Piccazzo; Riccardo Picazzo; Mehrdad Naseri; Paolo Ricci; Andrea Marziano; Lorenzo Bacigalupo; Ennio Biscaldi; Gian Andrea Rollandi; Filippo Grillo-Ruggieri; Mohsen Farsad Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-04-30 Impact factor: 3.411