Literature DB >> 12639656

Limited value of bone scintigraphy and computed tomography in assessing biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.

Christopher J Kane1, Christopher L Amling, Peter A S Johnstone, Nali Pak, Raymond S Lance, J Brantley Thrasher, John P Foley, Robert H Riffenburgh, Judd W Moul.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To define the utility of bone scan and computed tomography (CT) in the evaluation of patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the Center for Prostate Disease Research database was undertaken to identify patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1989 and 1998. Patients who developed biochemical recurrence (two prostate-specific antigen [PSA] levels greater than 0.2 ng/mL) and underwent either bone scan or CT within 3 years of this recurrence were selected for analysis. The preoperative clinical parameters, pathologic findings, serum PSA levels, follow-up data, and radiographic results were reviewed.
RESULTS: One hundred thirty-two patients with biochemical recurrence and a bone scan or CT scan were identified. Of the 127 bone scans, 12 (9.4%) were positive. The patients with true-positive bone scans had an average PSA at the time of the bone scan of 61.3 +/- 71.2 ng/mL (range 1.3 to 123). Their PSA velocities, calculated from the PSA levels determined immediately before the radiographic studies, averaged 22.1 +/- 24.7 ng/mL/mo (range 0.14 to 60.0). Only 2 patients with a positive bone scan had a PSA velocity of less than 0.5 ng/mL/mo. Of the 86 CT scans, 12 (14.0%) were positive. On logistic regression analysis, PSA and PSA velocity predicted the bone scan result (P <0.001 each) and PSA velocity predicted the CT scan result (P = 0.047).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy have a low probability of a positive bone scan (9.4%) or a positive CT scan (14.0%) within 3 years of biochemical recurrence. Most patients with a positive bone scan have a high PSA level and a high PSA velocity (greater than 0.5 ng/mL/mo).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12639656     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02411-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  67 in total

1.  Bone scintigraphy: procedure guidelines for tumour imaging.

Authors:  Emilio Bombardieri; Cumali Aktolun; Richard P Baum; Angelika Bishof-Delaloye; John Buscombe; Jean François Chatal; Lorenzo Maffioli; Roy Moncayo; Luc Morteímans; Sven N Reske
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  A pilot study evaluating serum pro-prostate-specific antigen in patients with rising PSA following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Antonino Sottile; Cinzia Ortega; Alfredo Berruti; Monica Mangioni; Sara Saponaro; Alessandra Polo; Veronica Prati; Giovanni Muto; Massimo Aglietta; Filippo Montemurro
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  PSA doubling time for prediction of [(11)C]choline PET/CT findings in prostate cancer patients with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Giampiero Giovacchini; Maria Picchio; Vincenzo Scattoni; Rita Garcia Parra; Alberto Briganti; Luigi Gianolli; Francesco Montorsi; Cristina Messa
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Salvage robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: indications and outcomes.

Authors:  Stephen B Williams; Jim C Hu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  [PSA recurrence after primary curative therapy--local or systemic? When is a second curative therapy still possible?].

Authors:  M P Wirth; F M Engelhardt
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  The value of multimodality imaging in the investigation of a PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy in the Irish hospital setting.

Authors:  L C McLoughlin; S Inder; D Moran; C O'Rourke; R P Manecksha; T H Lynch
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  Combined Whole Body and Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a 1-Step Approach to the Simultaneous Assessment of Local Recurrence and Metastatic Disease after Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Nicola L Robertson; Evis Sala; Matthias Benz; Jonathan Landa; Peter Scardino; Howard I Scher; Hedvig Hricak; Hebert A Vargas
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 7.450

8. 

Authors:  Jonathan I Izawa
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 9.  Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted Radiohalogenated PET and Therapeutic Agents for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Steven P Rowe; Alexander Drzezga; Bernd Neumaier; Markus Dietlein; Michael A Gorin; Michael R Zalutsky; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 10.  Imaging assessment of local recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Michael J Magnetta; David Casalino; Matthew T Heller
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.