Literature DB >> 24339001

Assessment of ligand binding site predictions in CASP10.

Tiziano Gallo Cassarino1, Lorenza Bordoli, Torsten Schwede.   

Abstract

The identification of amino acid residues in proteins involved in binding small molecule ligands is an important step for their functional characterization, as the function of a protein often depends on specific interactions with other molecules. The accuracy of computational methods aiming to predict such binding residues was evaluated within the "function prediction (prediction of binding sites, FN)" category of the critical assessment of protein structure prediction (CASP) experiment. In the last edition of the experiment (CASP10), 17 research groups participated in this category, and their predictions were evaluated on 13 prediction targets containing biologically relevant ligands. The results of this experiment indicate that several methods achieved an overall good performance, showing the usefulness of such methods in predicting ligand binding residues. As in previous years, methods based on a homology transfer approach were dominating. In comparison to CASP9, a larger fraction of the top predictors are automated servers. However, due to the small number of targets and the characteristics of the prediction format, the differences observed among the first ten methods were not statistically significant and it was also not possible to analyze differences in accuracy for different ligand types or overall structure, difficulty. To overcome these limitations and to allow for a more detailed evaluation, in future editions of CASP, methods in the FN category will no longer be evaluated on the "normal" CASP targets, but assessed continuously by CAMEO (continuous automated model evaluation) based on weekly prereleased sequences from the PDB.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CASP; active site; assessment; binding site; cofactor; evaluation; ligand; protein function; protein structure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24339001      PMCID: PMC4495912          DOI: 10.1002/prot.24495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  43 in total

1.  Assessment of template based protein structure predictions in CASP9.

Authors:  Valerio Mariani; Florian Kiefer; Tobias Schmidt; Juergen Haas; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-10-15

2.  Templates are available to model nearly all complexes of structurally characterized proteins.

Authors:  Petras J Kundrotas; Zhengwei Zhu; Joël Janin; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Protein modeling: what happened to the "protein structure gap"?

Authors:  Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 5.006

4.  Assessment of ligand-binding residue predictions in CASP9.

Authors:  Tobias Schmidt; Jürgen Haas; Tiziano Gallo Cassarino; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-10-11

5.  Crystal structure of reduced MsAcg, a putative nitroreductase from Mycobacterium smegmatis and a close homologue of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Acg.

Authors:  François-Xavier Chauviac; Martin Bommer; Jun Yan; Gary Parkin; Tina Daviter; Philip Lowden; Emma L Raven; Konstantinos Thalassinos; Nicholas H Keep
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  CASP9 assessment of free modeling target predictions.

Authors:  Lisa Kinch; Shuo Yong Shi; Qian Cong; Hua Cheng; Yuxing Liao; Nick V Grishin
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-10-14

7.  Domain enhanced lookup time accelerated BLAST.

Authors:  Grzegorz M Boratyn; Alejandro A Schäffer; Richa Agarwala; Stephen F Altschul; David J Lipman; Thomas L Madden
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 4.540

8.  The CRISPR associated protein Cas4 Is a 5' to 3' DNA exonuclease with an iron-sulfur cluster.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Taciana Kasciukovic; Malcolm F White
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  BioLiP: a semi-manually curated database for biologically relevant ligand-protein interactions.

Authors:  Jianyi Yang; Ambrish Roy; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  OpenStructure: an integrated software framework for computational structural biology.

Authors:  M Biasini; T Schmidt; S Bienert; V Mariani; G Studer; J Haas; N Johner; A D Schenk; A Philippsen; T Schwede
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2013-04-19
View more
  20 in total

1.  GalaxySite: ligand-binding-site prediction by using molecular docking.

Authors:  Lim Heo; Woong-Hee Shin; Myeong Sup Lee; Chaok Seok
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Computational methods and tools for binding site recognition between proteins and small molecules: from classical geometrical approaches to modern machine learning strategies.

Authors:  Gabriele Macari; Daniele Toti; Fabio Polticelli
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 3.  Template-based prediction of protein function.

Authors:  Donald Petrey; T Scott Chen; Lei Deng; Jose Ignacio Garzon; Howook Hwang; Gorka Lasso; Hunjoong Lee; Antonina Silkov; Barry Honig
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 6.809

4.  Proteins and Their Interacting Partners: An Introduction to Protein-Ligand Binding Site Prediction Methods with a Focus on FunFOLD3.

Authors:  Danielle Allison Brackenridge; Liam James McGuffin
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

5.  PDBspheres: a method for finding 3D similarities in local regions in proteins.

Authors:  Adam T Zemla; Jonathan E Allen; Dan Kirshner; Felice C Lightstone
Journal:  NAR Genom Bioinform       Date:  2022-10-10

6.  FINDSITEcomb2.0: A New Approach for Virtual Ligand Screening of Proteins and Virtual Target Screening of Biomolecules.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Hongnan Cao; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Biological function derived from predicted structures in CASP11.

Authors:  Peter J Huwe; Qifang Xu; Maxim V Shapovalov; Vivek Modi; Mark D Andrake; Roland L Dunbrack
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-06-15

8.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)--round x.

Authors:  John Moult; Krzysztof Fidelis; Andriy Kryshtafovych; Torsten Schwede; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-12-17

9.  GRaSP-web: a machine learning strategy to predict binding sites based on residue neighborhood graphs.

Authors:  Charles A Santana; Sandro C Izidoro; Raquel C de Melo-Minardi; Jonathan D Tyzack; António J M Ribeiro; Douglas E V Pires; Janet M Thornton; Sabrina de A Silveira
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 19.160

10.  DeepDISE: DNA Binding Site Prediction Using a Deep Learning Method.

Authors:  Samuel Godfrey Hendrix; Kuan Y Chang; Zeezoo Ryu; Zhong-Ru Xie
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.