Literature DB >> 21987472

Assessment of ligand-binding residue predictions in CASP9.

Tobias Schmidt1, Jürgen Haas, Tiziano Gallo Cassarino, Torsten Schwede.   

Abstract

Interactions between proteins and their ligands play central roles in many physiological processes. The structural details for most of these interactions, however, have not yet been characterized experientially. Therefore, various computational tools have been developed to predict the location of binding sites and the amino acid residues interacting with ligands. In this manuscript, we assess the performance of 33 methods participating in the ligand-binding site prediction category in CASP9. The overall accuracy of ligand-binding site predictions in CASP9 appears rather high (average Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.62 for the 10 top performing groups) and compared to previous experiments more groups performed equally well. However, this should be seen in context of a strong bias in the test data toward easy template-based models. Overall, the top performing methods have converged to a similar approach using ligand-binding site inference from related homologous structures, which limits their applicability for difficult de novo prediction targets. Here, we present the results of the CASP9 assessment of the ligand-binding site category, discuss examples for successful and challenging prediction targets in CASP9, and finally suggest changes in the format of the experiment to overcome the current limitations of the assessment.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21987472      PMCID: PMC5628505          DOI: 10.1002/prot.23174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  33 in total

Review 1.  Virtual screening of chemical libraries.

Authors:  Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Assessment of predictions submitted for the CASP7 function prediction category.

Authors:  Gonzalo López; Ana Rojas; Michael Tress; Alfonso Valencia
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2007

3.  Prediction of protein functional residues from sequence by probability density estimation.

Authors:  J D Fischer; C E Mayer; J Söding
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-01-02       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  A threading-based method (FINDSITE) for ligand-binding site prediction and functional annotation.

Authors:  Michal Brylinski; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  LIGSITE: automatic and efficient detection of potential small molecule-binding sites in proteins.

Authors:  M Hendlich; F Rippmann; G Barnickel
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.518

6.  3DLigandSite: predicting ligand-binding sites using similar structures.

Authors:  Mark N Wass; Lawrence A Kelley; Michael J E Sternberg
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  OpenStructure: a flexible software framework for computational structural biology.

Authors:  Marco Biasini; Valerio Mariani; Jürgen Haas; Stefan Scheuber; Andreas D Schenk; Torsten Schwede; Ansgar Philippsen
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Assessment of ligand binding residue predictions in CASP8.

Authors:  Gonzalo López; Iakes Ezkurdia; Michael L Tress
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009

9.  Ongoing and future developments at the Universal Protein Resource.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  siteFiNDER|3D: a web-based tool for predicting the location of functional sites in proteins.

Authors:  C Axel Innis
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  37 in total

1.  Target highlights in CASP9: Experimental target structures for the critical assessment of techniques for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Andriy Kryshtafovych; John Moult; Sergio G Bartual; J Fernando Bazan; Helen Berman; Darren E Casteel; Evangelos Christodoulou; John K Everett; Jens Hausmann; Tatjana Heidebrecht; Tanya Hills; Raymond Hui; John F Hunt; Jayaraman Seetharaman; Andrzej Joachimiak; Michael A Kennedy; Choel Kim; Andreas Lingel; Karolina Michalska; Gaetano T Montelione; José M Otero; Anastassis Perrakis; Juan C Pizarro; Mark J van Raaij; Theresa A Ramelot; Francois Rousseau; Liang Tong; Amy K Wernimont; Jasmine Young; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-10-21

2.  Protein Structure and Function Prediction Using I-TASSER.

Authors:  Jianyi Yang; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Curr Protoc Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-12-17

3.  Assessment of ligand binding site predictions in CASP10.

Authors:  Tiziano Gallo Cassarino; Lorenza Bordoli; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2014-02

4.  Annotation of Alternatively Spliced Proteins and Transcripts with Protein-Folding Algorithms and Isoform-Level Functional Networks.

Authors:  Hongdong Li; Yang Zhang; Yuanfang Guan; Rajasree Menon; Gilbert S Omenn
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2017

5.  GalaxySite: ligand-binding-site prediction by using molecular docking.

Authors:  Lim Heo; Woong-Hee Shin; Myeong Sup Lee; Chaok Seok
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Structure and Protein Interaction-Based Gene Ontology Annotations Reveal Likely Functions of Uncharacterized Proteins on Human Chromosome 17.

Authors:  Chengxin Zhang; Xiaoqiong Wei; Gilbert S Omenn; Yang Zhang
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 4.466

7.  Computational methods and tools for binding site recognition between proteins and small molecules: from classical geometrical approaches to modern machine learning strategies.

Authors:  Gabriele Macari; Daniele Toti; Fabio Polticelli
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  COFACTOR: improved protein function prediction by combining structure, sequence and protein-protein interaction information.

Authors:  Chengxin Zhang; Peter L Freddolino; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Biological function derived from predicted structures in CASP11.

Authors:  Peter J Huwe; Qifang Xu; Maxim V Shapovalov; Vivek Modi; Mark D Andrake; Roland L Dunbrack
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-06-15

Review 10.  Innovations in proteomic profiling of cancers: alternative splice variants as a new class of cancer biomarker candidates and bridging of proteomics with structural biology.

Authors:  Gilbert S Omenn; Rajasree Menon; Yang Zhang
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.