Literature DB >> 24334660

Cross-institute evaluations of inhibitor-resistant PCR reagents for direct testing of aerosol and blood samples containing biological warfare agent DNA.

Timothy D Minogue1, Phillip A Rachwal, Adrienne Trombley Hall, Jeffery W Koehler, Simon A Weller.   

Abstract

Rapid pathogen detection is crucial for the timely introduction of therapeutics. Two groups (one in the United Kingdom and one in the United States) independently evaluated inhibitor-resistant PCR reagents for the direct testing of substrates. In the United Kingdom, a multiplexed Bacillus anthracis (target) and Bacillus subtilis (internal-control) PCR was used to evaluate 4 reagents against 5 PCR inhibitors and down-selected the TaqMan Fast Virus 1-Step master mix (Life Technologies Inc.). In the United States, four real-time PCR assays (targeting B. anthracis, Brucella melitensis, Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus [VEEV], and Orthopoxvirus spp.) were used to evaluate 5 reagents (plus the Fast Virus master mix) against buffer, blood, and soil samples and down-selected the KAPA Blood Direct master mix (KAPA Biosystems Inc.) with added Platinum Taq (Life Technologies). The down-selected reagents underwent further testing. In the United Kingdom experiments, both reagents were tested against seven contrived aerosol collector samples containing B. anthracis Ames DNA and B. subtilis spores from a commercial formulation (BioBall). In PCR assays with reaction mixtures containing 40% crude sample, an airfield-collected sample induced inhibition of the B. subtilis PCR with the KAPA reagent and complete failure of both PCRs with the Fast Virus reagent. However, both reagents allowed successful PCR for all other samples-which inhibited PCRs with a non-inhibitor-resistant reagent. In the United States, a cross-assay limit-of-detection (LoD) study in blood was conducted. The KAPA Blood Direct reagent allowed the detection of agent DNA (by four PCRs) at higher concentrations of blood in the reaction mixture (2.5%) than the Fast Virus reagent (0.5%), although LoDs differed between assays and reagent combinations. Across both groups, the KAPA Blood Direct reagent was determined to be the optimal reagent for inhibition relief in PCR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24334660      PMCID: PMC3911037          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03478-13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  31 in total

Review 1.  Pre-PCR processing: strategies to generate PCR-compatible samples.

Authors:  Peter Rådström; Rickard Knutsson; Petra Wolffs; Maria Lövenklev; Charlotta Löfström
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  Antibody to the E3 glycoprotein protects mice against lethal venezuelan equine encephalitis virus infection.

Authors:  Michael D Parker; Marilyn J Buckley; Vanessa R Melanson; Pamela J Glass; David Norwood; Mary Kate Hart
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Detection of low numbers of bacterial cells in soils and sediments by polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  Y L Tsai; B H Olson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  Inhibition and facilitation of nucleic acid amplification.

Authors:  I G Wilson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Complex polysaccharides as PCR inhibitors in feces: Helicobacter pylori model.

Authors:  L Monteiro; D Bonnemaison; A Vekris; K G Petry; J Bonnet; R Vidal; J Cabrita; F Mégraud
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Smallpox and pan-orthopox virus detection by real-time 3'-minor groove binder TaqMan assays on the roche LightCycler and the Cepheid smart Cycler platforms.

Authors:  David A Kulesh; Robert O Baker; Bonnie M Loveless; David Norwood; Susan H Zwiers; Eric Mucker; Chris Hartmann; Rafael Herrera; David Miller; Deanna Christensen; Leonard P Wasieloski; John Huggins; Peter B Jahrling
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Small-Scale DNA Sample Preparation Method for Field PCR Detection of Microbial Cells and Spores in Soil.

Authors: 
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-07-01       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Bacillus anthracis spore suspensions: determination of stability and comparison of enumeration techniques.

Authors:  J L Almeida; B Harper; K D Cole
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 3.772

9.  Ambient influenza and avian influenza virus during dust storm days and background days.

Authors:  Pei-Shih Chen; Feng Ta Tsai; Chien Kun Lin; Chun-Yuh Yang; Chang-Chuan Chan; Chea-Yuan Young; Chien-Hung Lee
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Mutants of Taq DNA polymerase resistant to PCR inhibitors allow DNA amplification from whole blood and crude soil samples.

Authors:  Milko B Kermekchiev; Lyubka I Kirilova; Erika E Vail; Wayne M Barnes
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  5 in total

1.  Buffer AVL Alone Does Not Inactivate Ebola Virus in a Representative Clinical Sample Type.

Authors:  Sophie J Smither; Simon A Weller; Amanda Phelps; Lin Eastaugh; Sarah Ngugi; Lyn M O'Brien; Jackie Steward; Steve G Lonsdale; Mark S Lever
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of the Biofire FilmArray BioThreat-E Test (v2.5) for Rapid Identification of Ebola Virus Disease in Heat-Treated Blood Samples Obtained in Sierra Leone and the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Simon A Weller; Daniel Bailey; Steven Matthews; Sarah Lumley; Angela Sweed; Derren Ready; Gary Eltringham; Jade Richards; Richard Vipond; Roman Lukaszewski; Phillippa M Payne; Emma Aarons; Andrew J Simpson; Emma J Hutley; Tim Brooks
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparative analysis of the sensitivity of metagenomic sequencing and PCR to detect a biowarfare simulant (Bacillus atrophaeus) in soil samples.

Authors:  Delphine Plaire; Simon Puaud; Marie-Claude Marsolier-Kergoat; Jean-Marc Elalouf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Advances in Directly Amplifying Nucleic Acids from Complex Samples.

Authors:  Faye M Walker; Kuangwen Hsieh
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-30

5.  Evaluation of a microfluidic chip system for preparation of bacterial DNA from swabs, air, and surface water samples.

Authors:  Sandra Julich; Helmut Hotzel; Claudia Gärtner; Daniel Trouchet; Marwa Fawzy El Metwaly Ahmed; Nicole Kemper; Herbert Tomaso
Journal:  Biologicals       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 1.856

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.