Literature DB >> 24324306

Comparative evaluation of the efficiency of four ceramic finishing systems.

Prasad Aravind1, P Abdul Razak, P G Francis, Johnson K Issac, R P Shanoj, T P Sasikumar.   

Abstract

AIM: To compare the effect of four different finishing systems and diamond paste on ceramic roughness with the objectives of evaluating the roughness of ceramic surface of prepared specimens after abrasion, finishing and polishing. MATERIALS &
METHODS: A total of 50 test specimens were fabricated in the form of discs of diameter 13mm and 0.6mm thickness. Test specimens were then randomly distributed into five groups of 10 and coded. All the test specimens were then abraded with 125μm diamond in unidirectional motion to create surface roughness that will simulate occlusal or incisal correction. The values were recorded and the specimens were then finished using the various finishing systems. multiple range tests by Duncan's procedure. One way Anova was used to calculate the p-value
Results: After fini shing, the Ra,Rq,Rz and Rt values showed a tendency to decline to levels much inferior to the values obtained after the preparation of the specimens. Ra values of group III specimens were slightly higher and the increase was significant. The highest Rt value [5.29] obtained after polishing is below the lowest roughness values [7.42] obtained after finishing the specimens.
CONCLUSIONS: Finishing and polishing procedures have a significant role in reducing the roughness of ceramics.Following abrasion with diamond point to simulate clinical adjustment the roughness values doubled when compared to the initial reading.Ra, Rq,Rz and Rt values suggest that Sof lex is the most efficient of all the systems tested followed by auto glazing.After the final diamond paste polishing, sof lex group specimens showed the best finish and auto glazed specimens showed a value almost as equal to the so flex group. How to cite this article: Aravind P, Razak PA, Francis PG, Issac JK, Shanoj RP, Sasikumar TP. Comparative Evaluation of the Efficiency of Four Ceramics Finishing Systems. J Int Oral Health 2013; 5(5):59-64.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ceramic; Finishing Systems; Randomized Clinical Trial

Year:  2013        PMID: 24324306      PMCID: PMC3845286     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Oral Health        ISSN: 0976-1799


  11 in total

1.  Efficacy of a porcelain refinishing system in restoring surface finish after grinding with fine and extra-fine diamond burs.

Authors:  C J Patterson; A C McLundie; D R Stirrups; W G Taylor
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.426

2.  When to glaze--an electron microscope study.

Authors:  N Barghi; L Alexander; R A Draugh
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 3.  Glazing and finishing dental porcelain: a literature review.

Authors:  A al-Wahadni; D M Martin
Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 4.  The methods for the generation of smoothness in dental ceramics.

Authors:  Kerem Yilmaz; Pelin Ozkan
Journal:  Compend Contin Educ Dent       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb

5.  A study of porcelain surfaces as utilized in fixed prosthodontics.

Authors:  N Barghi; C J King; R A Draughn
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  Studies on the wear of porcelain, enamel, and gold.

Authors:  G E Monasky; D F Taylor
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.426

7.  Roughness of pontic materials and dental plaque.

Authors:  J A Clayton; E Green
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1970-04       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  An evaluation of adjustment and postadjustment finishing techniques on the surface of porcelain-bonded-to-metal crowns.

Authors:  D A Newitter; E R Schlissel; M S Wolff
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 3.426

9.  An evaluation of postadjustment polishing techniques for porcelain denture teeth.

Authors:  E R Schlissel; D A Newitter; R R Renner; A J Gwinnett
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 3.426

10.  Comparison of two different methods of polishing porcelain.

Authors:  C Bessing; A Wiktorsson
Journal:  Scand J Dent Res       Date:  1983-12
View more
  4 in total

1.  The effect of adjustment and finishing procedure on roughness, strength, and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia.

Authors:  Isıl Ozturk; Ipek Caglar; Zeynep Yesil Duymus
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.606

2.  Effect of different coloring techniques and surface treatment methods on the surface roughness of monolithic zirconia.

Authors:  Rashin Giti; Shekoofeh Haghdoost; Elham Ansarifard
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2020-03-17

3.  The effect of various polishing systems on surface roughness and phase transformation of monolithic zirconia.

Authors:  Ipek Caglar; Sabit Melih Ates; Zeynep Yesil Duymus
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 1.904

4.  Polish of interface areas between zirconia, silicate-ceramic, and composite with diamond-containing systems.

Authors:  Philipp-Cornelius Pott; Johannes Philipp Hoffmann; Meike Stiesch; Michael Eisenburger
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 1.904

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.