Literature DB >> 24320465

Investigation of realistic PET simulations incorporating tumor patient's specificity using anthropomorphic models: creation of an oncology database.

Panagiotis Papadimitroulas1, George Loudos, Amandine Le Maitre, Mathieu Hatt, Florent Tixier, Nikos Efthimiou, George C Nikiforidis, Dimitris Visvikis, George C Kagadis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The GATE Monte Carlo simulation toolkit is used for the implementation of realistic PET simulations incorporating tumor heterogeneous activity distributions. The reconstructed patient images include noise from the acquisition process, imaging system's performance restrictions and have limited spatial resolution. For those reasons, the measured intensity cannot be simply introduced in GATE simulations, to reproduce clinical data. Investigation of the heterogeneity distribution within tumors applying partial volume correction (PVC) algorithms was assessed. The purpose of the present study was to create a simulated oncology database based on clinical data with realistic intratumor uptake heterogeneity properties.
METHODS: PET/CT data of seven oncology patients were used in order to create a realistic tumor database investigating the heterogeneity activity distribution of the simulated tumors. The anthropomorphic models (NURBS based cardiac torso and Zubal phantoms) were adapted to the CT data of each patient, and the activity distribution was extracted from the respective PET data. The patient-specific models were simulated with the Monte Carlo Geant4 application for tomography emission (GATE) in three different levels for each case: (a) using homogeneous activity within the tumor, (b) using heterogeneous activity distribution in every voxel within the tumor as it was extracted from the PET image, and (c) using heterogeneous activity distribution corresponding to the clinical image following PVC. The three different types of simulated data in each case were reconstructed with two iterations and filtered with a 3D Gaussian postfilter, in order to simulate the intratumor heterogeneous uptake. Heterogeneity in all generated images was quantified using textural feature derived parameters in 3D according to the ground truth of the simulation, and compared to clinical measurements. Finally, profiles were plotted in central slices of the tumors, across lines with heterogeneous activity distribution for visual assessment.
RESULTS: The accuracy of the simulated database was assessed against the original clinical images. The PVC simulated images matched the clinical ones best. Local, regional, and global features extracted from the PVC simulated images were closest to the clinical measurements, with the exception of the size zone variability and the mean intensity values, where heterogeneous tumors showed better reproducibility. The profiles on PVC simulated tumors after postfiltering seemed to represent the more realistic heterogeneous regions with respect to the clinical reference.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the authors investigated the input activity map heterogeneity in the GATE simulations of tumors with heterogeneous activity distribution. The most realistic heterogeneous tumors were obtained by inserting PVC activity distributions from the clinical image into the activity map of the simulation. Partial volume effect (PVE) can play a crucial role in the quantification of heterogeneity within tumors and have an important impact on applications such as patient follow-up during treatment and assessment of tumor response to therapy. The development of such a database incorporating patient anatomical and functional variability can be used to evaluate new image processing or analysis algorithms, while providing control of the ground truth, which is not available when dealing with clinical datasets. The database includes all images used and generated in this study, as well as the sinograms and the attenuation phantoms for further investigation. It is freely available to the interested reader of the journal at http://www.med.upatras.gr/oncobase/.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24320465     DOI: 10.1118/1.4826162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  10 in total

1.  Impact of Region-of-Interest Delineation Methods, Reconstruction Algorithms, and Intra- and Inter-Operator Variability on Internal Dosimetry Estimates Using PET.

Authors:  N López-Vilanova; J Pavía; M A Duch; A Catafau; D Ros; S Bullich
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Classification and evaluation strategies of auto-segmentation approaches for PET: Report of AAPM task group No. 211.

Authors:  Mathieu Hatt; John A Lee; Charles R Schmidtlein; Issam El Naqa; Curtis Caldwell; Elisabetta De Bernardi; Wei Lu; Shiva Das; Xavier Geets; Vincent Gregoire; Robert Jeraj; Michael P MacManus; Osama R Mawlawi; Ursula Nestle; Andrei B Pugachev; Heiko Schöder; Tony Shepherd; Emiliano Spezi; Dimitris Visvikis; Habib Zaidi; Assen S Kirov
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Preclinical positron emission tomography scanner based on a monolithic annulus of scintillator: initial design study.

Authors:  Alexander V Stolin; Peter F Martone; Gangadhar Jaliparthi; Raymond R Raylman
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-01-05

4.  Design and evaluation of an accurate CNR-guided small region iterative restoration-based tumor segmentation scheme for PET using both simulated and real heterogeneous tumors.

Authors:  Alpaslan Koç; Albert Güveniş
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  The first MICCAI challenge on PET tumor segmentation.

Authors:  Mathieu Hatt; Baptiste Laurent; Anouar Ouahabi; Hadi Fayad; Shan Tan; Laquan Li; Wei Lu; Vincent Jaouen; Clovis Tauber; Jakub Czakon; Filip Drapejkowski; Witold Dyrka; Sorina Camarasu-Pop; Frédéric Cervenansky; Pascal Girard; Tristan Glatard; Michael Kain; Yao Yao; Christian Barillot; Assen Kirov; Dimitris Visvikis
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2017-12-09       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Multi-site quality and variability analysis of 3D FDG PET segmentations based on phantom and clinical image data.

Authors:  Reinhard R Beichel; Brian J Smith; Christian Bauer; Ethan J Ulrich; Payam Ahmadvand; Mikalai M Budzevich; Robert J Gillies; Dmitry Goldgof; Milan Grkovski; Ghassan Hamarneh; Qiao Huang; Paul E Kinahan; Charles M Laymon; James M Mountz; John P Muzi; Mark Muzi; Sadek Nehmeh; Matthew J Oborski; Yongqiang Tan; Binsheng Zhao; John J Sunderland; John M Buatti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Impact of consensus contours from multiple PET segmentation methods on the accuracy of functional volume delineation.

Authors:  A Schaefer; M Vermandel; C Baillet; A S Dewalle-Vignion; R Modzelewski; P Vera; L Massoptier; C Parcq; D Gibon; T Fechter; U Nemer; I Gardin; U Nestle
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  PETSTEP: Generation of synthetic PET lesions for fast evaluation of segmentation methods.

Authors:  Beatrice Berthon; Ida Häggström; Aditya Apte; Bradley J Beattie; Assen S Kirov; John L Humm; Christopher Marshall; Emiliano Spezi; Anne Larsson; C Ross Schmidtlein
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.685

9.  Activity painting: PET images of freely defined activity distributions applying a novel phantom technique.

Authors:  Attila Forgacs; Piroska Kallos-Balogh; Ferenc Nagy; Aron K Krizsan; Ildiko Garai; Lajos Tron; Magnus Dahlbom; Laszlo Balkay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Revisiting the identification of tumor sub-volumes predictive of residual uptake after (chemo)radiotherapy: influence of segmentation methods on 18F-FDG PET/CT images.

Authors:  Mathieu Hatt; Florent Tixier; Marie-Charlotte Desseroit; Bogdan Badic; Baptiste Laurent; Dimitris Visvikis; Catherine Cheze Le Rest
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.