Literature DB >> 26567163

Impact of consensus contours from multiple PET segmentation methods on the accuracy of functional volume delineation.

A Schaefer1, M Vermandel2,3, C Baillet4, A S Dewalle-Vignion5, R Modzelewski6, P Vera6, L Massoptier7, C Parcq7, D Gibon7, T Fechter8,9, U Nemer10, I Gardin6, U Nestle8,9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of consensus algorithms on segmentation results when applied to clinical PET images. In particular, whether the use of the majority vote or STAPLE algorithm could improve the accuracy and reproducibility of the segmentation provided by the combination of three semiautomatic segmentation algorithms was investigated.
METHODS: Three published segmentation methods (contrast-oriented, possibility theory and adaptive thresholding) and two consensus algorithms (majority vote and STAPLE) were implemented in a single software platform (Artiview®). Four clinical datasets including different locations (thorax, breast, abdomen) or pathologies (primary NSCLC tumours, metastasis, lymphoma) were used to evaluate accuracy and reproducibility of the consensus approach in comparison with pathology as the ground truth or CT as a ground truth surrogate.
RESULTS: Variability in the performance of the individual segmentation algorithms for lesions of different tumour entities reflected the variability in PET images in terms of resolution, contrast and noise. Independent of location and pathology of the lesion, however, the consensus method resulted in improved accuracy in volume segmentation compared with the worst-performing individual method in the majority of cases and was close to the best-performing method in many cases. In addition, the implementation revealed high reproducibility in the segmentation results with small changes in the respective starting conditions. There were no significant differences in the results with the STAPLE algorithm and the majority vote algorithm.
CONCLUSION: This study showed that combining different PET segmentation methods by the use of a consensus algorithm offers robustness against the variable performance of individual segmentation methods and this approach would therefore be useful in radiation oncology. It might also be relevant for other scenarios such as the merging of expert recommendations in clinical routine and trials or the multiobserver generation of contours for standardization of automatic contouring.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-FDG PET; Consensus algorithms; Image segmentation; PET image segmentation; Radiation oncology; STAPLE

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26567163     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-015-3239-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  39 in total

1.  Multi-centre calibration of an adaptive thresholding method for PET-based delineation of tumour volumes in radiotherapy planning of lung cancer.

Authors:  A Schaefer; U Nestle; S Kremp; D Hellwig; A Grgic; H G Buchholz; W Mischke; C Gromoll; P Dennert; M Plotkin; S Senftleben; D Thorwarth; M Tosch; A Wahl; H Wengenmair; C Rübe; C-M Kirsch
Journal:  Nuklearmedizin       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 1.379

2.  Is STAPLE algorithm confident to assess segmentation methods in PET imaging?

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Dewalle-Vignion; Nacim Betrouni; Clio Baillet; Maximilien Vermandel
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Segmentation of PET volumes by iterative image thresholding.

Authors:  Walter Jentzen; Lutz Freudenberg; Ernst G Eising; Melanie Heinze; Wolfgang Brandau; Andreas Bockisch
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Reliability, repeatability and reproducibility: analysis of measurement errors in continuous variables.

Authors:  J W Bartlett; C Frost
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 7.299

5.  A new method based on both fuzzy set and possibility theories for tumor volume segmentation on PET images.

Authors:  A S Dewalle-Vignion; N Betrouni; N Makni; D Huglo; J Rousseau; M Vermandel
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2008

6.  Comparison of different methods for delineation of 18F-FDG PET-positive tissue for target volume definition in radiotherapy of patients with non-Small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Ursula Nestle; Stephanie Kremp; Andrea Schaefer-Schuler; Christiane Sebastian-Welsch; Dirk Hellwig; Christian Rübe; Carl-Martin Kirsch
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  A novel fuzzy C-means algorithm for unsupervised heterogeneous tumor quantification in PET.

Authors:  Saoussen Belhassen; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Defining a radiotherapy target with positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Quinten C Black; Inga S Grills; Larry L Kestin; Ching-Yee O Wong; John W Wong; Alvaro A Martinez; Di Yan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Delineation of small mobile tumours with FDG-PET/CT in comparison to pathology in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Sébastien Hapdey; Agathe Edet-Sanson; Pierrick Gouel; Benoît Martin; Romain Modzelewski; Marc Baron; Anca Berghian; Frédérique Forestier-Lebreton; Dragos Georgescu; Jean-Michel Picquenot; Isabelle Gardin; Bernard Dubray; Pierre Vera
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  Ductal carcinoma in situ: correlation between FDG-PET/CT and histopathology.

Authors:  Asako Azuma; Mitsuhiro Tozaki; Kensuke Ito; Eisuke Fukuma; Tomoko Tanaka; Toshihiro O'uchi
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2008-10-31
View more
  12 in total

1.  Classification and evaluation strategies of auto-segmentation approaches for PET: Report of AAPM task group No. 211.

Authors:  Mathieu Hatt; John A Lee; Charles R Schmidtlein; Issam El Naqa; Curtis Caldwell; Elisabetta De Bernardi; Wei Lu; Shiva Das; Xavier Geets; Vincent Gregoire; Robert Jeraj; Michael P MacManus; Osama R Mawlawi; Ursula Nestle; Andrei B Pugachev; Heiko Schöder; Tony Shepherd; Emiliano Spezi; Dimitris Visvikis; Habib Zaidi; Assen S Kirov
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Time to Prepare for Risk Adaptation in Lymphoma by Standardizing Measurement of Metabolic Tumor Burden.

Authors:  Sally F Barrington; Michel Meignan
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 3.  The developing role of FDG PET imaging for prognostication and radiotherapy target volume delineation in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Tom Konert; Jeroen B van de Kamer; Jan-Jakob Sonke; Wouter V Vogel
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Delineation of lung cancer with FDG PET/CT during radiation therapy.

Authors:  J Ganem; S Thureau; I Gardin; R Modzelewski; S Hapdey; P Vera
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Repeatability of [18F]FDG PET/CT total metabolic active tumour volume and total tumour burden in NSCLC patients.

Authors:  Guilherme D Kolinger; David Vállez García; Gerbrand M Kramer; Virginie Frings; Egbert F Smit; Adrianus J de Langen; Rudi A J O Dierckx; Otto S Hoekstra; Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 3.138

6.  Analyzing the co-localization of substantia nigra hyper-echogenicities and iron accumulation in Parkinson's disease: A multi-modal atlas study with transcranial ultrasound and MRI.

Authors:  Seyed-Ahmad Ahmadi; Kai Bötzel; Johannes Levin; Juliana Maiostre; Tassilo Klein; Wolfgang Wein; Verena Rozanski; Olaf Dietrich; Birgit Ertl-Wagner; Nassir Navab; Annika Plate
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 4.881

7.  Interobserver Agreement on Automated Metabolic Tumor Volume Measurements of Deauville Score 4 and 5 Lesions at Interim 18F-FDG PET in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Authors:  Gerben J C Zwezerijnen; Jakoba J Eertink; Coreline N Burggraaff; Sanne E Wiegers; Ekhlas A I N Shaban; Simone Pieplenbosch; Daniela E Oprea-Lager; Pieternella J Lugtenburg; Otto S Hoekstra; Henrica C W de Vet; Josee M Zijlstra; Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 11.082

8.  Comparison of different automated lesion delineation methods for metabolic tumor volume of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Xiao-Yi Wang; Yan-Feng Zhao; Ying Liu; Yi-Kun Yang; Zheng Zhu; Ning Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Evaluation of prognostic models developed using standardised image features from different PET automated segmentation methods.

Authors:  Craig Parkinson; Kieran Foley; Philip Whybra; Robert Hills; Ashley Roberts; Chris Marshall; John Staffurth; Emiliano Spezi
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.138

10.  PET segmentation of bulky tumors: Strategies and workflows to improve inter-observer variability.

Authors:  Elisabeth Pfaehler; Coreline Burggraaff; Gem Kramer; Josée Zijlstra; Otto S Hoekstra; Mathilde Jalving; Walter Noordzij; Adrienne H Brouwers; Marc G Stevenson; Johan de Jong; Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.