Literature DB >> 31848977

Design and evaluation of an accurate CNR-guided small region iterative restoration-based tumor segmentation scheme for PET using both simulated and real heterogeneous tumors.

Alpaslan Koç1, Albert Güveniş2.   

Abstract

Tumor delineation accuracy directly affects the effectiveness of radiotherapy. This study presents a methodology that minimizes potential errors during the automated segmentation of tumors in PET images. Iterative blind deconvolution was implemented in a region of interest encompassing the tumor with the number of iterations determined from contrast-to-noise ratios. The active contour and random forest classification-based segmentation method was evaluated using three distinct image databases that included both synthetic and real heterogeneous tumors. Ground truths about tumor volumes were known precisely. The volumes of the tumors were in the range of 0.49-26.34 cm3, 0.64-1.52 cm3, and 40.38-203.84 cm3 respectively. Widely available software tools, namely, MATLAB, MIPAV, and ITK-SNAP were utilized. When using the active contour method, image restoration reduced mean errors in volumes estimation from 95.85 to 3.37%, from 815.63 to 17.45%, and from 32.61 to 6.80% for the three datasets. The accuracy gains were higher using datasets that include smaller tumors for which PVE is known to be more predominant. Computation time was reduced by a factor of about 10 in the smaller deconvolution region. Contrast-to-noise ratios were improved for all tumors in all data. The presented methodology has the potential to improve delineation accuracy in particular for smaller tumors at practically feasible computational times. Graphical abstract Evaluation of accurate lesion volumes using CNR-guided and ROI-based restoration method for PET images.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deconvolution; Image restoration; Medical image segmentation; PET; Radiotherapy planning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31848977     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-019-02094-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  32 in total

Review 1.  Partial-volume effect in PET tumor imaging.

Authors:  Marine Soret; Stephen L Bacharach; Irène Buvat
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Using deconvolution to improve PET spatial resolution in OSEM iterative reconstruction.

Authors:  G Rizzo; I Castiglioni; G Russo; M G Tana; F Dell'Acqua; M C Gilardi; F Fazio; S Cerutti
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.176

3.  Joint solution for PET image segmentation, denoising, and partial volume correction.

Authors:  Ziyue Xu; Mingchen Gao; Georgios Z Papadakis; Brian Luna; Sanjay Jain; Daniel J Mollura; Ulas Bagci
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 4.  A review on segmentation of positron emission tomography images.

Authors:  Brent Foster; Ulas Bagci; Awais Mansoor; Ziyue Xu; Daniel J Mollura
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 4.589

5.  Segmentation and quantitative analysis of individual cells in developmental tissues.

Authors:  Kaustav Nandy; Jusub Kim; Dean P McCullough; Matthew McAuliffe; Karen J Meaburn; Terry P Yamaguchi; Prabhakar R Gudla; Stephen J Lockett
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2014

6.  Simultaneous Tumor Segmentation, Image Restoration, and Blur Kernel Estimation in PET Using Multiple Regularizations.

Authors:  Laquan Li; Jian Wang; Wei Lu; Shan Tan
Journal:  Comput Vis Image Underst       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.876

7.  Partial-volume correction in PET: validation of an iterative postreconstruction method with phantom and patient data.

Authors:  Boon-Keng Teo; Youngho Seo; Stephen L Bacharach; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Steven K Libutti; Himanshu Shukla; Bruce H Hasegawa; Randall A Hawkins; Benjamin L Franc
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Automated tumour boundary delineation on (18)F-FDG PET images using active contour coupled with shifted-optimal thresholding method.

Authors:  Kitiwat Khamwan; Anchali Krisanachinda; Charnchai Pluempitiwiriyawej
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 9.  Impact of partial-volume correction in oncological PET studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matthijs C F Cysouw; Gerbrand M Kramer; Linda J Schoonmade; Ronald Boellaard; Henrica C W de Vet; Otto S Hoekstra
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  The future of hybrid imaging-part 2: PET/CT.

Authors:  Thomas Beyer; David W Townsend; Johannes Czernin; Lutz S Freudenberg
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2011-02-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.