Literature DB >> 24319620

Failure of cement-augmented pedicle screws in the osteoporotic spine: a case report.

Addisu Mesfin1, Christopher B Komanski, A Jay Khanna.   

Abstract

The treatment of patients with osteoporosis and spinal abnormalities that require surgical intervention is difficult because of the challenge of achieving fixation in osteoporotic bone. As the population ages, this challenge is becoming a common problem in the field of spinal surgery. Although numerous publications exist about the biomechanical benefits of various fixation devices and techniques, no standard of care has emerged that offers a clear method for accomplishing spinal stabilization in such patients. This case presents the failure mode of cement-augmented pedicle screws in a patient with severe osteoporosis, a description of the methods used to attain fixation and spinal stability during the revision surgery, and the outcome achieved for the patient 1 year after surgery. An 82-year-old female with a T9 burst fracture and a history of osteoporosis underwent minimally invasive instrumentation from T5 to T12, fusion from T7 to T11, and decompression from T8 to T10. Four weeks after surgery, the patient returned to the hospital because of back pain. Imaging studies showed that the pedicle screws at T11 and T12, which were augmented with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), had pulled out of the vertebral bodies. The pedicle screws failed by disengaging from the PMMA and displacing posteriorly and inferiorly. The PMMA did not appear to move during this process. A revision surgery was performed, in which the posterior construct was extended caudally and cephalad, the pedicle screws were augmented with PMMA, and a titanium hook and woven polyester band were used to increase the points of fixation. At 1-year follow-up after revision, our patient showed radiographic evidence of fusion, and the construct continued to maintain stability in the osteoporotic spine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone cement; cement augmentation; failure; osteoporosis; pedicle screw; polymethylmethacrylate

Year:  2013        PMID: 24319620      PMCID: PMC3848329          DOI: 10.1177/2151458513500787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil        ISSN: 2151-4585


  17 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation and preliminary clinical experience with an expansive pedicle screw design.

Authors:  S D Cook; S L Salkeld; T S Whitecloud; J Barbera
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  2000-06

2.  Revision pedicle screws. Bigger, longer shims--what is best?

Authors:  D W Polly; J R Orchowski; R G Ellenbogen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Direct medical costs attributable to osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  S E Gabriel; A N A Tosteson; C L Leibson; C S Crowson; G R Pond; C S Hammond; L J Melton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Pedicle screw design and cement augmentation in osteoporotic vertebrae: effects of fenestrations and cement viscosity on fixation and extraction.

Authors:  Theodore J Choma; Ferris M Pfeiffer; Ryan W Swope; Jesse P Hirner
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Instrumentation of the osteoporotic spine: biomechanical and clinical considerations.

Authors:  Karthikeyan E Ponnusamy; Sravisht Iyer; Gaurav Gupta; A Jay Khanna
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Polymethylmethacrylate augmentation of pedicle screw for osteoporotic spinal surgery: a novel technique.

Authors:  Ming-Chau Chang; Chien-Lin Liu; Tain-Hsiung Chen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Pullout strength of pedicle screws augmented with particulate calcium phosphate: an experimental study.

Authors:  Ata Hashemi; Drew Bednar; Samir Ziada
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2008-09-14       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Pedicle screw motion in the osteoporotic spine after augmentation with laminar hooks, sublaminar wires, or calcium phosphate cement: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Juay-Seng Tan; Brian K Kwon; Marcel F Dvorak; Charles G Fisher; Thomas R Oxland
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Cement augmentation of pedicle screw fixation using novel cannulated cement insertion device.

Authors:  Chad Waits; Douglas Burton; Terence McIff
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Fenestrated pedicle screws for cement-augmented purchase in patients with bone softening: a review of 21 cases.

Authors:  Luca Amendola; Alessandro Gasbarrini; Matteo Fosco; Christiano Esteves Simoes; Silvia Terzi; Federico De Iure; Stefano Boriani
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2011-11-08
View more
  5 in total

1.  Timing of PMMA cement application for pedicle screw augmentation affects screw anchorage.

Authors:  Werner Schmoelz; Christian Heinz Heinrichs; Sven Schmidt; Angel R Piñera; Felix Tome-Bermejo; Javier M Duart; Marlies Bauer; Luis Álvarez Galovich
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Cement Augmentation Without Posterior Fixation to Treat Isthmic Spondylolisthesis in an Osteopenic Patient-A Surgical Technique.

Authors:  Mathew Cyriac; Justin Kyhos; Uchechi Iweala; Danny Lee; Matthew Mantell; Warren Yu; Joseph R O'Brien
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-15

3.  Technical Note: Pedicle Cement Augmentation with Proximal Screw Toggle and Loosening.

Authors:  Wen Jie Choy; William R Walsh; Kevin Phan; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-06-09       Impact factor: 2.071

4.  Cement Augmentation of Two-Level Lumbar Corpectomy Cage After Malposition: A Novel Salvage Procedure Technical Note.

Authors:  Mousa K Hamad; Jessica Ryvlin; Justin Langro; Aisha S Obeidallah; Jason Marin; Rafael De La Garza Ramos; Saikiran Murthy; Seon-Kyu Lee; Reza Yassari
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-12

5.  A Transmission-Based Dielectric Property Probe for Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Paul Meaney; Tomas Rydholm; Helena Brisby
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.