Literature DB >> 18449032

Polymethylmethacrylate augmentation of pedicle screw for osteoporotic spinal surgery: a novel technique.

Ming-Chau Chang1, Chien-Lin Liu, Tain-Hsiung Chen.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective study to evaluate the clinical results of patients with osteoporosis and various spinal diseases treated surgically with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) augmented pedicle screw.
OBJECTIVE: To report a novel technique using PMMA for pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic spinal surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Many studies have proved that the stiffness and strength of pedicle screw fixation can be significantly increased when the pedicle screw is augmented with various cements. However, most of those studies were experimental. Clinical reports using those materials for pedicle screw augmentation are rare and a practical and reliable technique for primary pedicle screw augmentation with cement has not yet been established.
METHODS: Forty-one patients [23 female, 18 male, mean age 75.1 (50-90) years] with osteoporosis and various spinal diseases underwent spinal decompression and instrumentation with PMMA augmentation of pedicle screw. Pre-and postoperative scores for visual analogue scale for pain and Oswestry disability index questionnaire were analyzed. The screw migration, which is the distance from the screw tip to the anterior cortex and upper endplate of vertebra, was also evaluated immediately after the operation and at the mean 22.3 months final follow-up. RESULTS.: Totally 291 of 300 screws were augmented with PMMA. There was neither neurologic deterioration nor symptomatic cement leakage after surgery. The mean visual analogue scale pain score of these patients improved from 9.2 to 1.5 (P < 0.01) and the functional Oswestry disability index score improved from 77.5% to 44.2% (P < 0.01). Kyphotic deformity was improved from average 23.2 degrees to 11.9 degrees after surgery, and to 14.9 degrees at final follow-up (P < 0.01). The average loss of kyphosis correction was 3 degrees. There was no significant screw migration when the screws distances just after operation and at the final follow-up were compared (P > 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The presented technique of PMMA for augmentation of pedicle screw is a safe, reliable, and practical technique for osteoporotic patients who also had various spinal diseases and need spinal instrumentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18449032     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816f6c73

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  42 in total

1.  Pullout strength of pedicle screws with cement augmentation in severe osteoporosis: a comparative study between cannulated screws with cement injection and solid screws with cement pre-filling.

Authors:  Lih-Huei Chen; Ching-Lung Tai; De-Mei Lee; Po-Liang Lai; Yen-Chen Lee; Chi-Chien Niu; Wen-Jer Chen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  A case of pedicle screw loosening treated by modified transpedicular screw augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate.

Authors:  Suk-Hyung Kang; Kyoung-Tae Kim; Seung Won Park; Young-Baeg Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2011-01-31

3.  Analysis of bone cement distribution around fenestrated pedicle screws in low bone quality lumbosacral vertebrae.

Authors:  Sergio Gómez González; Gerard Cabestany Bastida; Maria Daniela Vlad; José López López; Pablo Buenestado Caballero; Luis Alvarez-Galovich; Maria Rodríguez-Arguisjuela; Enrique Fernández Aguado
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Evaluation of a fiber reinforced drillable bone cement for screw augmentation in a sheep model--mechanical testing.

Authors:  Benjamin J Ahern; Robert D Harten; Elliott A Gruskin; Thomas P Schaer
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.689

5.  Anterior vertebroplasty of adjacent levels after vertebral body replacement.

Authors:  Florian Geiger; Konstantinos Kafchitsas; Michael Rauschmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Surgical patterns in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  Sanganagouda Patil; Saurabh Rawall; Deepak Singh; Kapil Mohan; Premik Nagad; Bhavin Shial; Uday Pawar; Abhay Nene
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Osteoporosis and the Management of Spinal Degenerative Disease (II).

Authors:  Félix Tomé-Bermejo; Angel R Piñera; Luis Alvarez
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2017-11

8.  The fates of pedicle screws and functional outcomes in a geriatric population following polymethylmethacrylate augmentation fixation for the osteoporotic thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures with mean ninety five month follow-up.

Authors:  Hsi-Hsien Lin; Ming-Chau Chang; Shih-Tien Wang; Chien-Lin Liu; Po-Hsin Chou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-11       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  The Importance of Surface Technology in Spinal Fusion.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Katsuura; Joshua Wright-Chisem; Adam Wright-Chisem; Sohrab Virk; Steven McAnany
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-02-12

10.  Role of 'low cost Indian implants' in our practice: our experience with 1,572 pedicle screws.

Authors:  Saurabh Rawall; Kapil Mohan; Premick Nagad; Ashutosh Sabnis; Uday Pawar; Abhay Nene
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-07-17       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.