Literature DB >> 22996264

Pedicle screw design and cement augmentation in osteoporotic vertebrae: effects of fenestrations and cement viscosity on fixation and extraction.

Theodore J Choma1, Ferris M Pfeiffer, Ryan W Swope, Jesse P Hirner.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Experimental, human cadaveric study.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the fixation effects of injecting cement augmentation before screw insertion or after insertion of fenestrated screws; the effect of modulating cement viscosity; and the effects of these techniques on screw removal. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: It seems clear that cement augmentation can enhance pedicle screw fixation in osteoporotic bone. What remains to be demonstrated is the aspects of optimal technique such that fixation is enhanced with the greatest safety profile.
METHODS: Part I: Human osteoporotic vertebrae were instrumented with solid (nonaugmented) screws, solid screws with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), partially cannulated fenestrated (Pfen) screws, or fully cannulated fenestrated (Ffen) screws through which PMMA was injected. Screw fixation was tested in pullout. Part II: Ffen screws were augmented with standard low-viscosity PMMA versus high-viscosity PMMA. Part III: Sample cohorts were extracted from vertebrae to assess required torque and characterize difficulty of extraction.
RESULTS: Part I: Pfen screws demonstrated the greatest fixation with mean failure force of 690 ± 182 N. All methods of cement augmentation demonstrated significant increases in screw fixation. Part II: Ffen screws did not demonstrate a significant difference in pullout strength when high-viscosity PMMA was used as compared with low-viscosity PMMA. Part III: Mean extraction torque values for solid augmented screws, Ffen screws, and Pfen screws were 1.167, 1.764, and 1.794 Nm, respectively, but these differences did not reach significance. None of the osteoporotic vertebrae sustained catastrophic failure during augmented screw extraction.
CONCLUSION: Polymethylmethacrylate cement augmentation clearly enhances pedicle screw fixation in osteoporotic vertebrae when tested in pure pullout. The technique used for cement injection and choice of specialty screws can have a significant impact on the magnitude of this effect. Fenestrated screws have the capacity to confine cement placement in the vertebral body and may provide enhanced safety from cement extrusion into the spinal canal. It is feasible to inject high-viscosity PMMA through this fenestration geometry, and higher-viscosity cement may enhance the fixation effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22996264     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182740e56

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  29 in total

1.  Effect of augmentation techniques on the failure of pedicle screws under cranio-caudal cyclic loading.

Authors:  Richard Bostelmann; Alexander Keiler; Hans Jakob Steiger; Armin Scholz; Jan Frederick Cornelius; Werner Schmoelz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Analysis of bone cement distribution around fenestrated pedicle screws in low bone quality lumbosacral vertebrae.

Authors:  Sergio Gómez González; Gerard Cabestany Bastida; Maria Daniela Vlad; José López López; Pablo Buenestado Caballero; Luis Alvarez-Galovich; Maria Rodríguez-Arguisjuela; Enrique Fernández Aguado
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Biomechanical Analysis of Capsular Repair Versus Arthrex TFCC Ulnar Tunnel Repair for Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears.

Authors:  Jayson C Johnson; Ferris M Pfeiffer; Jill E Jouret; David M Brogan
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2018-01-11

4.  The cement leakage in cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation in degenerative lumbosacral diseases: a retrospective analysis of 202 cases and 950 augmented pedicle screws.

Authors:  Hui-Zhi Guo; Yong-Chao Tang; Dan-Qing Guo; Shun-Cong Zhang; Yong-Xian Li; Guo-Ye Mo; Pei-Jie Luo; Ten-Peng Zhou; Yan-Huai Ma; Xiao-Bing Jiang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Osteoporosis and the Management of Spinal Degenerative Disease (I).

Authors:  Félix Tomé-Bermejo; Angel R Piñera; Luis Alvarez-Galovich
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2017-09

6.  Failure of cement-augmented pedicle screws in the osteoporotic spine: a case report.

Authors:  Addisu Mesfin; Christopher B Komanski; A Jay Khanna
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2013-09

7.  Surgical treatment of osteoporotic thoraco-lumbar compressive fractures: the use of pedicle screw with augmentation PMMA.

Authors:  Massimo Girardo; P Cinnella; G Gargiulo; P Viglierchio; A Rava; S Aleotti
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Timing of PMMA cement application for pedicle screw augmentation affects screw anchorage.

Authors:  Werner Schmoelz; Christian Heinz Heinrichs; Sven Schmidt; Angel R Piñera; Felix Tome-Bermejo; Javier M Duart; Marlies Bauer; Luis Álvarez Galovich
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Influence of the screw augmentation technique and a diameter increase on pedicle screw fixation in the osteoporotic spine: pullout versus fatigue testing.

Authors:  Rebecca A Kueny; Jan P Kolb; Wolfgang Lehmann; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Gerd Huber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Screw augmentation for spinopelvic fixation in neuromuscular spine deformities: technical note.

Authors:  Arnaud Dubory; Manon Bachy; Houssam Bouloussa; Aurélien Courvoisier; Baptiste Morel; Raphaël Vialle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.